Earlier quoted context omitted.
The author of Kdb is Arthur Whitney. He is another extreme programmer who has had a huge influence on fintech and made boat loads of cash I would presume.
He also helped in the development of J with Roger Hui and Ken Iverson, the creator of APL, by writing a one page interpreter for J over an afternoon or two. I am always drawn to prototyping and writing solutions in J. I am not a web developer, but for mathematics and statistics, it is amazing. I've always wondered how similar and different K and J are on a deep level, but I have always stuck with J.
Chuck Moore, Extreme Programmer
171–180 of 186 posts
Re: Chuck Moore, Extreme Programmer
#172Earlier quoted context omitted.
> : right# negate 32 + . ; This is an example of "ugly" Forth code. It's ok here to make the code as short as possible. In reality I would write (educational) Forth code this way. The texts in parentheses are comments. ( compute Hypotenuse sqrt[a²+b²] ) : hypo ( a b ) swap ( b a ) dup * ( b a² ) swap ( a² b ) dup * ( a² b² ) + ( a²+b² ) sqrt ( result ) ; ( Application: 1.2 3.4 hypo )
Isn't the first swap unneccesary?
Re: Chuck Moore, Extreme Programmer
#173The "Do Not Speculate!" idea reminds me of the practice of delivering "the kitchen sink" when only a small program that does one thing would suffice. It reminds me of when, e.g., a 1990s-2000s Windows user needed a small program that does one thing, and in order to get it, the download from Microsoft was an installer with hundreds of megabytes of unneeded binary files. It was not possible to download only the single…
This is what I like about Rebol & Red...pity Rebol didn't catch on more. The full Rebol download is a single executable (no real install) and can build GUIs, and so much more in a very small amount of code.
Re: Chuck Moore, Extreme Programmer
#174Earlier quoted context omitted.
And I'm happy to see someone from Iowa posting here. If someone from a different minority group posted here I would be happy as well. There are many ways to be diverse.
You have kind of an absurd definition of diversity.
That ignores so many other kinds of diversity in the world.
Your definition is far too exclusive and narrow minded.
Re: Chuck Moore, Extreme Programmer
#175Earlier quoted context omitted.
You have kind of an absurd definition of diversity.
You only care about diversity involving people from socioeconomic or racial groups associated with poverty or historical oppression. That ignores so many other kinds of diversity in the world. Your definition is far too exclusive and narrow minded.
Re: Chuck Moore, Extreme Programmer
#176Earlier quoted context omitted.
You have kind of an absurd definition of diversity.
You only care about diversity involving people from socioeconomic or racial groups associated with poverty or historical oppression. That ignores so many other kinds of diversity in the world. Your definition is far too exclusive and narrow minded.
Re: Chuck Moore, Extreme Programmer
#177Earlier quoted context omitted.
You only care about diversity involving people from socioeconomic or racial groups associated with poverty or historical oppression. That ignores so many other kinds of diversity in the world. Your definition is far too exclusive and narrow minded.
What types of diversity can you have amongst racially, socially, and economically homogenous people? What are you talking about? What is your grand, open-minded idea that ignores what actual diversity is?
Re: Chuck Moore, Extreme Programmer
#178Earlier quoted context omitted.
You only care about diversity involving people from socioeconomic or racial groups associated with poverty or historical oppression. That ignores so many other kinds of diversity in the world. Your definition is far too exclusive and narrow minded.
What types of diversity can you have amongst racially, socially, and economically homogenous people? What are you talking about? What is your grand, open-minded idea that ignores what actual diversity is?
Re: Chuck Moore, Extreme Programmer
#179Earlier quoted context omitted.
You only care about diversity involving people from socioeconomic or racial groups associated with poverty or historical oppression. That ignores so many other kinds of diversity in the world. Your definition is far too exclusive and narrow minded.
What types of diversity can you have amongst racially, socially, and economically homogenous people? What are you talking about? What is your grand, open-minded idea that ignores what actual diversity is?
Re: Chuck Moore, Extreme Programmer
#180Earlier quoted context omitted.
You only care about diversity involving people from socioeconomic or racial groups associated with poverty or historical oppression. That ignores so many other kinds of diversity in the world. Your definition is far too exclusive and narrow minded.
What types of diversity can you have amongst racially, socially, and economically homogenous people? What are you talking about? What is your grand, open-minded idea that ignores what actual diversity is?