Live data from Hacker News

A glut of PhDs who can’t find academic jobs

theguardian.com

171–173 of 173 posts

Re: A glut of PhDs who can’t find academic jobs

#171
post #151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I hope the people who don't think of using a bitwise operator still get through. I've been programming for ~9 years and have never thought to use it.

Yeah it's secondary so I don't hold it against the ones that didn't come up with it (one person came up with an idea I hadn't considered, I like that a person can think of different ways at all, which was casting the int to string and then checking the last character), it's a minor piece of information. All else being equal I'd like to see knowledge of bitwise operations demonstrated (and I'm sad to say that at my wo…

That's a fairly reasonable approach. Looking for creativity in a relatively mundane problem is probably a good thing. The bitwise operator thing, if it actually needed to be used like you say, could be more appropriate for a coding standards guide if the candidate was otherwise suited. The immediate comparison I made, though admittedly contrived, was to that of the comma operator which I just learned about. Unlike self executing anonymous functions—which I'd consider hard to understand but critical to know—, they both fall into the category of fairly obscure pieces of syntax.

Re: A glut of PhDs who can’t find academic jobs

#172
post #153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It sounds like a good way? Yes, I agree intuitively it sounds reasonable, but that alone is not considered a best practice. Why do we all work so hard to go by good data in our real work, but when it comes to interviewing someone we’re encouraged to just wing it, or use our best judgement? Careers can be affected with this stuff, and bad hiring decisions in either direction can hurt an organization. There is research…

not gotcha trick puzzle questions. In what world is testing if a number is even or odd a gotcha trick puzzle question?

I've interviewed some people who felt it was a trick question.

Re: A glut of PhDs who can’t find academic jobs

#173
post #84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That’s funny because every “engineer” or “analyst” my job employs has that exact attitude. They don’t even have PhDs.

I'm not sure I get what you mean? If the specific title of PhD is unrelated to people using their titles as false sources of authorities, then what I said isn't wrong. I guess you could argue that in research many people have PhDs, so whether you have one or not is no longer a big deal.

The average occurrence of that sort of mentality across the population suggests most PhDs would have at least that majority view as being a subset of the larger. There’s also no reason to assume the factors that lead someone to obtain a PhD counter an elitist attitude. If anything, it certainly bolsters the odds through sunk cost and other psychological factors.

Put another way, it’s been my experience that nearly everybody has a view that they’re better than average or different in some positive, unique way. The worlds full of hostie personalities as well.

Post reply on HN