Live data from Hacker News

Government launches login.gov to simplify access to public services

18f.gsa.gov

171–173 of 173 posts

Re: Government launches login.gov to simplify access to public services

#171
post #163
post #159

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Look up the secrecy and lack of oversight over the so-called "terrorist" watchlist and the calls for scope creep, and see if you are so confident about those first amendment rights. I'm sure failure to log in would not be considered a first amendment right. I agree that the government should be a far more dependable provider than any private sector organization. But the recent (last 20 years) enthusiasm for scope cre…

Does the government deny passports or driver licenses/IDs to people on those lists? Because that would be the equivalent here. I'm not saying the government wouldn't do it. I'm saying you would have constitutional basis to sue, which you don't have for companies. Some lawsuits against the no fly list have been successful. https://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security/victory-no-fly-l...

I'm not sure that it would be seen as equivalent here given the overall push away from net neutrality over the last decade. I could see many government officials making the (out-dated) argument that the internet is a non-essential service and you online profiles are not as critical as physical government-issues IDs.

Edit: Forgot this post was a couple days old, working through my HN backlog haha

Re: Government launches login.gov to simplify access to public services

#172

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Rails app?? I’d think something go-based would be more appropriate for this kind of service.

Why? Rails powers many huge, important things. Like GitHub.

Implementing sso idp requires pretty good crypto support - last I looked ruby, python, node don't have anything built in and use external native libraries (OpenSSL etc) that are a pain to setup and use securely.

Re: Government launches login.gov to simplify access to public services

#173
post #160
post #22

For those interested, development is done in the open here: https://github.com/18F/identity-idp

But issues opened remain unanswered..

I opened an issue. They answered it.

4 out of 5 open issues have comments from core members working with the issue opener.

Seems ok?

Post reply on HN