Amazon Echo Look
171–180 of 328 posts
Re: Amazon Echo Look
#172I think they are trying to find ways to reduce returns on clothing here. Crazy high percentages of clothing get returned... and why not? To be competitive with retail stores, online stores have to offer free shipping and returns. Try it on, if you don't like it... send it back. Very costly to the seller. Having a bot tell you, "You are pear-shaped, don't use pants with pockets..." or "This style isn't age appropriate…
I'm going with the forgiving, more capitalistic explanation and agreeing with you. This is about reducing returns on clothing. >just focus on simple rules every stylist knows Do you have a list of these simple rules somewhere? ;)
http://www.wikihow.com/Dress-for-Your-Body-Type
I had a friend once who walked me through all this while she was shopping. It was interesting to me that there could be, essentially, an algorithm to define what patterns people should use to select clothing. I remember it really wasn't all that complicated... but I'm sure it's a bit more nuanced than the first Google result explains. Anyway I'm pretty confident Amazon will get it mostly right, and be able to grow into the space from there. I think it's pretty cool they are trying this... dressing better is something we can all do. (=
Re: Amazon Echo Look
#173Re: Amazon Echo Look
#174In this case the real point of the depth-sensing camera hardware and machine-learning image analysis isn't hands-free selfies and robo-fashion advice. It's building a 3d model of your body to show what you would look like in different clothing, creating a clothes shopping experience that is competitive with shopping in person, and letting Amazon take on a big chunk of retail where it's not currently an appealing option.
Re: Amazon Echo Look
#175It's absolutely incredible to me that a device made to drive sales can itself be sold for $200. Furthermore, people will actually pay that much.
Re: Amazon Echo Look
#176I'm not normally one to be creeped out by these kind of things. But this is a device that's designed to take photos and videos of you while you get dressed, and will be both connected to the internet and constantly communicating those images over the network. This feels like a device literature professors would use to teach dystopian fiction writing. edit: case in point - matthewmcg's comment https://news.ycombinator…
Is it any riskier than a cell phone or laptop computer with a camera?
(1) This device is absolutely sealed and opaque. It can't (easily) be analyzed to see what it's running, doing, or sending. It's even more opaque than a phone. It has enough processing power to do local image analysis, object recognition, etc., so just looking at bulk traffic won't prove anything about whether or not it's watching.
(2) The camera in this device is part of its core functionality, is always on, and is situated deliberately so as to watch you.
(3) The device is literally an Amazon sales rep in your house. Its primary purpose is to represent Amazon and sell you stuff.
I've always thought Alexa and the other cloud-connected voice-activated things were completely insane. I will never own such a thing. Period. This takes it to a whole new level of creepiness.
Re: Amazon Echo Look
#177Re: Amazon Echo Look
#178Re: Amazon Echo Look
#179This looks very very strange. I can see the appeal of the regular Echo, but this..?
Re: Amazon Echo Look
#180I am not saying that Amazon is snooping on its users. All i am saying is that such devices are a prime target for hackers and government agencies. Recently wikileaks showed that CIA was using Samsung Smart TVs for snooping on its users[1]. Devices like this can are very attractive targets for government agencies.
[1]https://theintercept.com/2017/03/07/wikileaks-dump-shows-cia...