Earlier quoted context omitted.
They say they are using 333 emoji to represent ~34 bits.
33.52 bits to be precise, which is where the many-nines claim comes from: 1-(1/(333^4)) = ~0.999999999918
Voice Calls: Secure, Crystal-Clear, AI-Powered
171–180 of 299 posts
Re: Voice Calls: Secure, Crystal-Clear, AI-Powered
#172Re: Voice Calls: Secure, Crystal-Clear, AI-Powered
#173Re: Voice Calls: Secure, Crystal-Clear, AI-Powered
#174With talk of neural interfaces and augmentation will we have apps in the future that support human to human encryption I wonder?
Re: Voice Calls: Secure, Crystal-Clear, AI-Powered
#175I will definitely try this because I have trouble with all other voice chat services including Skype, WhatsApp and Hangouts. Often one of those three will work but not always. But the most annoying problem with any internet voice chat is not so much the quality but the latency. Landline phones have noticeably lower voice quality but one can still enjoy a conversation perfectly well. High latency, on the other hand, a…
>I always see these services talking about "crystal clear quality", but never latency, which is a shame. Maybe there is simply nothing they can do about it. I've noticed latency get worse and worse on the Internet since I started using it in the 90s and nobody seems to talk about it. Well, the first problem at home is likely your wireless. Live in an apartment and you can pick up 30 other routers in your wifi search.…
Re: Voice Calls: Secure, Crystal-Clear, AI-Powered
#176Earlier quoted context omitted.
Most people who I know use Telegram(me included) use it because it's frankly the nicest(fast, looks good) Messenger out there, not because of its security features. Personally I don't use the secret chat functionality; I would use Signal if I wanted to communicate securely.
I don't choose my car for its seatbelts, but if they are broken, I reject the car.
I do not use Telegrams security features though, so whether they are any good isn't relevant to me(and many other people).
Re: Voice Calls: Secure, Crystal-Clear, AI-Powered
#177Can anyone familiar with the matter say how secure is the 4-emoji verification code?
> Thanks to this modification, it becomes possible to prevent eavesdropping (MitM attacks on DH) with a probability of more than 0.9999999999 by using just over 33 bits of entropy in the visualization. These bits are presented to the users in the form of four emoticons. We have selected a pool of 333 emoji that all look quite different from one another and can be easily described in simple words in any language. 33 b…
Re: Voice Calls: Secure, Crystal-Clear, AI-Powered
#178Earlier quoted context omitted.
Correct, last article I recall reading about deciphering VBR from packet size alone was something in the neighborhood of 50% success rate.
Then why not compress really efficiently by just transmitting packet sizes?
Re: Voice Calls: Secure, Crystal-Clear, AI-Powered
#179Re: Voice Calls: Secure, Crystal-Clear, AI-Powered
#180Earlier quoted context omitted.
>I always see these services talking about "crystal clear quality", but never latency, which is a shame. Maybe there is simply nothing they can do about it. I've noticed latency get worse and worse on the Internet since I started using it in the 90s and nobody seems to talk about it. Well, the first problem at home is likely your wireless. Live in an apartment and you can pick up 30 other routers in your wifi search.…
I don't know much about the different router brands and models. Which would you consider to be some of the good ones?
thewirecutter.com/reviews/best-wi-fi-router/