Live data from Hacker News

AMD Zen and Ryzen 7 Review: A Deep Dive

anandtech.com

171–180 of 359 posts

Re: AMD Zen and Ryzen 7 Review: A Deep Dive

#171

Do high-end Ryzen chips need liquid cooling?

No, but if they have thermal and power headroom, the X chips will add 100MHz above the "boost" clock. They call it XFR (eXtended Frequency Range). So having a water cooler will make it more likely to get that last 100MHz, but I don't think it's going to make a big difference if you're not overclocking.

Re: AMD Zen and Ryzen 7 Review: A Deep Dive

#172
post #8

> ... this means that the base memory controller in the silicon should be able to support ECC. We know that it is disabled for the consumer parts, but nothing has been said regarding the Pro parts. ECC should be a standard feature. If you don't want it you don't have to use it but to disable simply for market segmentation is lame.

Considering previous AMD chips could use ECC I hope it's true this time as well. AMD's CEO Dr. Lisa Su has an AMA later today, we should probably ask her: https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/5vl431/its_happening_a... Might as well ask her about the possibility of coreboot if we are at it.

[deleted]

Re: AMD Zen and Ryzen 7 Review: A Deep Dive

#173

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I haven't found one yet, but as the chip is rated at 65W and the i7 7700k at 91W, it's pretty likely to draw less (at load anyway). I'd be curious to see what they draw whilst idle though.

After having a look at some of the links posted, it looks like the power draw is slightly higher than the i7 7700k in most tests, although lower in some. Looks like my assumption based on the TDP was a bit off (also my misapprehension that TDP is power draw, whoops) :)

Thermal output = power draw is correct though.

Re: AMD Zen and Ryzen 7 Review: A Deep Dive

#174
post #12

Do they ever do compiler speed tests or boot speed tests? Which of the existing ones would be most similar?

GCC is part of spec2006, which they optimize for. But the actual compilers people use (IE not that version of GCC) are rarely well-optimized for CPU. In fact, most compiler profiles are not flat yet, and where your compilation takes a long time, it's because some optimization or algorithm has gone nuts and needs to be fixed. Until that kind of state of the world changes, measuring compile time is IMHO, a bit pointles…

I think you're on the slippery slope here that lead to thinking Itanium was a good idea.

Re: AMD Zen and Ryzen 7 Review: A Deep Dive

#175

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That'd be a fun test, too. One would need to control for disk io but definitely useful. I wonder how many HN readers run FBSD

FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT on this very laptop. I'm going to build an 1800X-based box in a few weeks (for games; planning to run Steam on a GNU/Linux distro), I'll want to see `make -j16 buildworld` for sure.

Looking forward to that! Also would be nice see -j8 results.

Re: AMD Zen and Ryzen 7 Review: A Deep Dive

#176
post #170

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Considering previous AMD chips could use ECC I hope it's true this time as well. AMD's CEO Dr. Lisa Su has an AMA later today, we should probably ask her: https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/5vl431/its_happening_a... Might as well ask her about the possibility of coreboot if we are at it.

According to AMD: "ECC is not disabled. It works, but not validated for our consumer client platform." https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/5x4hxu/we_are_amd_crea...

What means validated in this case? It's not certified by AMD to work, so depending on the memory and motherboard combination it could work, or if you are unlucky it doesn't work?

btw: someone asked about coreboot: https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/5x4hxu/we_are_amd_crea...

Re: AMD Zen and Ryzen 7 Review: A Deep Dive

#177

AMD Ryzen 1800X (Summit Ridge): 3.6 GHz (4.0 GHz Turbo) over 16 threads 15,812 Passmark for ~$500 ----- Intel i7-7700K (Kaby Lake): 4.2 GHz (4.5 GHz Turbo) over 8 threads 12,321 Passmark for ~$350 ----- Intel Core i7-6850K (Broadwell E): 3.6 GHz (4.0 GHz Turbo) over 12 threads 14,500 Passmark for ~$575 ----- Competition is back. Ya!

And that's only CPU prices, don't forget mainboards, which are overpriced on the Intel X99 side!

No kidding, especially considering I'd like to stay in mAtx form factor...

Re: AMD Zen and Ryzen 7 Review: A Deep Dive

#178
post #167
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But it's still losing in every web and office single threaded benchmark. EDIT: compared to 7700k that costs about the same

Or, seen another way (better representation of the overall reality): The 7700k is losing in all aspects below w.r.t. the Ryzen 7 1800X, except absolute single-threaded perf. Intel is losing in: - absolute multi-threaded performance - relative multi-threaded performance per $ - memory bandwidth - L3-cache bound workloads (AMD has twice more L3) - price of motherboards

You left out the tiny detail that the 7700k is $150USD cheaper than the 1800X.

Re: AMD Zen and Ryzen 7 Review: A Deep Dive

#179
post #170

Earlier quoted context omitted.

According to AMD: "ECC is not disabled. It works, but not validated for our consumer client platform." https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/5x4hxu/we_are_amd_crea...

What means validated in this case? It's not certified by AMD to work, so depending on the memory and motherboard combination it could work, or if you are unlucky it doesn't work? btw: someone asked about coreboot: https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/5x4hxu/we_are_amd_crea...

Validated means run it through server/workstation grade testing. For the first Ryzen processors, focused on the prosumer / gaming market, this feature is enabled and working but not validated by AMD. You should not have issues creating a whitebox homelab or NAS with ECC memory enabled.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/5x4hxu/we_are_amd_crea...

Re: AMD Zen and Ryzen 7 Review: A Deep Dive

#180
post #9
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But it's still losing in every web and office single threaded benchmark. EDIT: compared to 7700k that costs about the same

Who buys a $350+ processor with 8C/16T for web/office?

Quad cores are the absolute minimum I would want for a standard office machine, unless it's only for a handful of basic applications. My latest work laptop is a quad core with 32 GB of RAM for running multiple VM's, but they couldn't give me an SSD which ends up wasting at least a few hours of productivity a week.
Post reply on HN