Live data from Hacker News

Behind the Pixel: Google’s First Real Threat to Apple’s iPhone

bloomberg.com

171–180 of 874 posts

Re: Behind the Pixel: Google’s First Real Threat to Apple’s iPhone

#171

The camera doesn't stick out the back of the phone and become the main contact point for all surfaces. This is true innovation :)

I don't get these recurring jabs at Apple. Why bother? It comes out as some sort of inferiority complex.

This is actually a jab at Nexus 6P's "visor":

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/b2/Front_and_bac...

Note the large black bar at the top.

It is glass and there are incidents where it cracks, causing unpleasant damage that is difficult to fix.

Re: Behind the Pixel: Google’s First Real Threat to Apple’s iPhone

#172
post #8

“The difference with this device is that we started from the beginning,” says Dave Burke, who runs Android engineering. Started from scratch, yet the end result looks like a iPhone knockoff from a random Chinese shanzhai company? http://i.imgur.com/LlqaAPO.png

In the image you linked: why are the OS home-screens switched?

That's the joke.

Re: Behind the Pixel: Google’s First Real Threat to Apple’s iPhone

#173
post #42

Are they keeping the nexus line or is this a replacement ?

It's a replacement, which leaves me wondering what I will do when it comes time to replace my 5X since these are almost double the price.

my first thought was to buy a spare 5X soon.

Re: Behind the Pixel: Google’s First Real Threat to Apple’s iPhone

#176
post #164

I'd have thought that with innovation and greater availability of components, smartphones would become cheaper. Instead, I experience quite the opposite with all these new devices.

Using this as evidence for that view is sort of like saying you're surprised at the relatively increasing expensiveness of cars after the press release about the new BMW 7 series, or Tesla Model S. Big sexy press releases are for high-end products. Consumer grade, cheaper offerings generally don't get as much media since they are lower margin products, but they do exist[1].

1: http://www.androidcentral.com/best-cheap-android-phones

Re: Behind the Pixel: Google’s First Real Threat to Apple’s iPhone

#177
post #86

I think it is just me but I find this 'book me a concert and fancy dinner' schtick rather boring. May be well off people are so busy and book these things so often that these virtual assistant really save time if price is of no concern to them.

Does anybody actually use these virtual assistants? They seem like the bluetooth dongle of the mid-2000s - friends wouldn't let friends use them. Is it just for people who drive? Or will there be a tipping point when it won't seem so arrogant barking commands on the subway or in a quiet office?

Every alarm, timer, and reminder I set (on my phone), are set by voice.

I chose it because "Set an alarm for 8am" really is the best interface to interact with that subsystem.

Re: Behind the Pixel: Google’s First Real Threat to Apple’s iPhone

#178

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>(which it won't be, because Apple SoCs are at least a generation ahead of everyone else) Can anyone confirm if this is true? I thought the general advantage for i[a-zA-Z0-9]\+ is a well defined small N number of targets, which allow great optimization. Generally, the parts on apple things are a bit older than the competition but they pull off more (at least in user's eyes) compared with Android due to that optimizat…

Recently, Apple has been about a year ahead. Compare the A9 (which shipped in the 6s in fall 2015) with the Snapdragon 810 (which shipped in the Nexus 6p at the same time). http://www.anandtech.com/show/9837/snapdragon-820-preview/2 http://www.anandtech.com/show/9686/the-apple-iphone-6s-and-i... . Heck, in many cases the A9 leaves the Snapdragon 820 behind, and that hasn't even shipped in a Nexus phone yet (the Pixel…

Wish apple was as enthusiastic about processor specs for the mac lineup as they are for the iphone lineup.

Re: Behind the Pixel: Google’s First Real Threat to Apple’s iPhone

#179
The corporate structure of Alphabet does not make sense to me.

Nest was broken out as a peer to Google, but now apparently hardware is using Nest staff and expertise, but hardware is part of Google.

And apparently this new hardware team is going whole-hog after the smartphone market, which is WAY larger than thermostats and web cams. But Nest is an Alphabet sub, and hardware is under Google.

And Android needs a "firewall" to protect existing hardware vendor relationships from the new hardware team. But both Android and hardware remain under Google, with YouTube and Search.

And there are 2 separate Alphabet subs for biosciences, and 2 separate subs for finance.

It doesn't look like it's implementing any sort of coherent strategy. Aside from company politics, why are some programs peers to Google, and others are subsidiaries of Google?

Post reply on HN