Earlier quoted context omitted.
Donald Trump's desire to "build a wall" is incoherent.
Donald Trump's incoherent.
Legal marijuana is taking a bite out of drug cartels' profits
171–180 of 238 posts
Re: Legal marijuana is taking a bite out of drug cartels' profits
#172> The latest data from the U.S. Border Patrol shows that last year, marijuana seizures along the southwest border tumbled to their lowest level in at least a decade. That does not mean there are less drugs being imported, just that less are being seized. I worked with the Border Patrol years ago and it was astounding how they tracked success: - When arrests increased, they celebrated that enforcement was working. - W…
That's true and a good point, but the article also quotes a Mexican grower who says the bulk price has come down about 50%. That's money right out of the cartels pockets.
Re: Legal marijuana is taking a bite out of drug cartels' profits
#173Earlier quoted context omitted.
It may be unrealistic, but it seems coherent enough to me. What's so crazy about border control?
Making Mexico pay for it for one and the other crazy ideas he wraps up in it. That, indeed, does make his plan incoherent.
On the other hand, given the trade deficit he could say, we're pulling out of Nafta, unless you kerb your unauthorized border crossings.
Alternatively he could fine the unauthorized border crossers they catch and partially fund it that way. Or he could institute temporary permits (seasonal whatever) and impose a fee for those. Also fine employers who hire undocumented workers and fund it partially that way.
It really depends on what he means by "Mexico" and "pay". But if he's flexible, and he appears to be, it could be possible.
Re: Legal marijuana is taking a bite out of drug cartels' profits
#174Earlier quoted context omitted.
I am surprised by the number of Tucson, AZ residents (where I live) that think there already is a large wall, all across the USA. You certainly see a large wall in Nogales, AZ/ Nogales SON. It is only there for the TV cameras, since a few miles out of town it is back to dual strand barbed wire cattle fence. Everybody who lives within a few miles either side of the border knows this - people in Tucson 60 miles away ar…
Aren't borders such silly concepts?
Re: Legal marijuana is taking a bite out of drug cartels' profits
#175Earlier quoted context omitted.
Interestingly, in Colorado it's legal for a company to fire an employee who has (legally) smoked marijuana. So even with legalization drug tests may remain a thing.
It's interesting, but taken through some lenses, maybe that's still OK? I've never smoked, but I wonder if I'd like my doctor to be high when he operates on me, or for an armorer to reassemble my rifle while high. Does marijuana influence attention to detail? Is there a way to ensure that people don't get high while at work, that they stay sober on the job? Anecdotally, from watching high people while I was in univer…
Re: Legal marijuana is taking a bite out of drug cartels' profits
#176Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think most people (at least from the Southwest) know about this; otherwise Donald Trump's desire to "build a wall" would be incoherent.
I am surprised by the number of Tucson, AZ residents (where I live) that think there already is a large wall, all across the USA. You certainly see a large wall in Nogales, AZ/ Nogales SON. It is only there for the TV cameras, since a few miles out of town it is back to dual strand barbed wire cattle fence. Everybody who lives within a few miles either side of the border knows this - people in Tucson 60 miles away ar…
We drove past a border patrol depot, and there were literally hundreds of vehicles. "Wow, the border patrol must have a huge number of staff to keep most of those active at once" > "No, those are just for the TV cameras - border patrol doesn't have anywhere near that number of staff"
Other oddities that stuck out for me in the area were that the border ingress to Mexico was literally just a turnstile, and that the distance markers about 20km short of the border on the US side were, indeed, in km instead of miles.
Re: Legal marijuana is taking a bite out of drug cartels' profits
#177Re: Legal marijuana is taking a bite out of drug cartels' profits
#178Earlier quoted context omitted.
Who care whether your weed is grown with passion? seizethecheese and gregpilling care about the quality of the product.
Yes, and they appear pretty passionless, too. Weed does that to people. Not that I would care. In a more serious tone, I was alluding to the Domestically grown weed that casual weed smokers buying from passionless business will never get to see. Either way, I could have pointed out that quality control is one of the more often noted benefits, in theory.
Are you using `Domestically grown' with a meaning that's different from `grown in the same country as the consumer'?
Re: Legal marijuana is taking a bite out of drug cartels' profits
#179Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is handled through most jobs requiring that people show up sober to the workplace. The same laws/rules would apply to marijuana. You can't operate heavy machinery while drunk or high, though caffeine and tobacco generally aren't regarded in the same way. It's foolish to think people will just throw caution to the wind and get high before doing their job.
If your employee is a habitual pot smoker there is still the risk that one day he turns up high for work. Why would you take that risk if you can hire somebody who does not smoke at all? Other than that, consumption of cannabis is correlated with a bunch of stuff that an employer may want to avoid (for instance increased impulsivity [1]) Given the fact that employers routinely choose to not hire somebody because of e…
Indeed, that's why I hire only teetotalers. After all, if they like to have a drink now and then, there's still a risk that one day they turn up drunk for work.
Re: Legal marijuana is taking a bite out of drug cartels' profits
#180Earlier quoted context omitted.
All government programs tend to work like that. Recession ? Private players to be blamed and government needs to act. Economic boom ? Government programs caused that boom. The legalization of marijuana is a much bigger battle. We will not get all the benefits of the free market unless government regulations are substantially reduced. If you cant buy Marijuana in Target or Wallmart it probably wont suffice.
All government programs tend to work like that. Recession ? Private players to be blamed and government needs to act. Economic boom ? Government programs caused that boom. Recession? Poor private companies groaning under the massive burden of big-government regulation, and idiotic government "interventions" in the market are to blame! Economic boom? The miracle of the free market succeeding in spite of all obstacles!…