Earlier quoted context omitted.
Damn, those functions are longgggg. While the code seems to be organized well, it is a hell to keep track of variables, and all the flow changes.
Spaghetti. More suitable for my plate than an app. I know that Java is a terribly verbose language, but even for Java this looks over the top. This code is written with a bulldozer ! How hard is it to refactor each of those branches into separate functions or objects ? If there's no time for that, I wonder, is there enough time to figure out the security and privacy implications of this entire codebase ? Should I tru…
WhatsApp is blocking Telegram links
171–180 of 240 posts
Re: WhatsApp is blocking Telegram links
#172Earlier quoted context omitted.
MSN Messenger was one of those "regional" services simillar to WhatsApp - it was very popular in Europe, pretty much everyone used it around here, while as far as I heard it was very rare in US.
"regional" services simillar to WhatsApp The app with a billion plus installs, quite likely the largest actively used chat app in the world is a "regional" service. Just to take a wild guess, you're not an iOS user from the bay area by any chance? I haven't come across too many Android users who are not using WhatsApp in the US.
Bashing on 'iOS users from the bay area' makes no sense, the parent also implies in his post that he is from Europe.
And as a non-iOS user, not from the bay area, I have rarely see people using WhatsApp, neither in Europe, nor in the US. The only few people I've seen using it is foreigners who want to stay in contact with relatives/friends in an country where WhatsApp is popular.
[1]http://news.microsoft.com/2003/05/12/100-million-customers-a...
Re: WhatsApp is blocking Telegram links
#173Isn't telegram just a really bad version of signal?
As far as I'm concerned, Signal is superior in every way. Telegram simply has gained a lot of publicity and increased its user base (which is critical for IM) thanks to E. Snowden.
Re: WhatsApp is blocking Telegram links
#174Earlier quoted context omitted.
Spaghetti. More suitable for my plate than an app. I know that Java is a terribly verbose language, but even for Java this looks over the top. This code is written with a bulldozer ! How hard is it to refactor each of those branches into separate functions or objects ? If there's no time for that, I wonder, is there enough time to figure out the security and privacy implications of this entire codebase ? Should I tru…
I don't think Telegram is something people who need security should be using, but this kind of stylistic shaming toward open-source projects is useless at best and harmful in most cases.
Re: WhatsApp is blocking Telegram links
#175Earlier quoted context omitted.
A reason not to use Telegram: https://oflisback.github.io/telegram-stalking/
Given the credibility attributed to Signal - f.x. by Bruce Schneier and Edward Snowden - I don't understand why it's not more popular than Telegram.
Right now, Telegram suffers from the same faults (phone number = identity, closed/central server), but excels in usability and client availability. Signal is - for me, right here - worse. And I _should_ be part of Signal's target group.
Re: WhatsApp is blocking Telegram links
#176Earlier quoted context omitted.
Have you even tried Telegram on the Web? It's clearly superior and yes, WhatsApp's solution feels like a nasty hack when compared to it. Also, didn't get that mention to iMessage.
Does it work when you're not storing your messages on their servers?
Re: WhatsApp is blocking Telegram links
#177WhatsApp is not linkifying Telegram URLs, but Telegram is not even sending messages that are shared from WhatsApp. Telegram is open source, so you can see for yourself here. https://github.com/DrKLO/Telegram/blob/74def22213846b1f90a26... On line 666: if (sendingText.contains("WhatsApp")) { //who needs this sent from ...? sendingText = null; }
> but Telegram is not even sending messages that are shared from WhatsApp This is wrong. If you follow the logic (which is admittedly difficult) you'll see they are stripping out the "sent from WhatsApp" tagline WhatsApp adds when you share a photo, etc from WhatsApp to Telegram. You'll still get the photo, it just won't have the tagline indicating where it came from. Still a bit shady but I also dislike the "Sent fr…
Re: WhatsApp is blocking Telegram links
#178Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't think Telegram is something people who need security should be using, but this kind of stylistic shaming toward open-source projects is useless at best and harmful in most cases.
Useless? I think it is a constructive criticism.
It seems to me about as constructive as walking into any software company and saying, "Ugh, these engineers are wearing t-shirts and their shoes are completely unshined! People, if these programmers care so little for their appearance, can you trust them to care about their code?"
Re: WhatsApp is blocking Telegram links
#179Earlier quoted context omitted.
> but Telegram is not even sending messages that are shared from WhatsApp This is wrong. If you follow the logic (which is admittedly difficult) you'll see they are stripping out the "sent from WhatsApp" tagline WhatsApp adds when you share a photo, etc from WhatsApp to Telegram. You'll still get the photo, it just won't have the tagline indicating where it came from. Still a bit shady but I also dislike the "Sent fr…
That is some horrifying code...
So you will run in to issues (not sure how it would manifest itself) if you share photo or video that does have text, but just doesn't contain "WhatsApp" ("Sent from FooBar").
It looks like it'll send a text and then send the photo[0] but who knows what kind of state will be modified when you send the text first.
[0] https://github.com/DrKLO/Telegram/blob/74def22213846b1f90a26...
Re: WhatsApp is blocking Telegram links
#180WhatsApp is not linkifying Telegram URLs, but Telegram is not even sending messages that are shared from WhatsApp. Telegram is open source, so you can see for yourself here. https://github.com/DrKLO/Telegram/blob/74def22213846b1f90a26... On line 666: if (sendingText.contains("WhatsApp")) { //who needs this sent from ...? sendingText = null; }
In other words: As my (green/new) sibling ones_and_zeros states, afaik that ONLY strips the text if it contains "WhatsApp" and you send non-text content. Which .. is an improvement, I guess. Or a band-aid to grudgingly fix a 'bug' in WhatsApp.