Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or you could use free software, and stop hoping for people around you to be honest.
Free != open source
Apple’s approach to privacy
171–172 of 172 posts
Re: Apple’s approach to privacy
#172Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
> I'd suggest you go 'deep inside you' and think again what should be the priorities to pay for. Thanks! As you're perhaps aware, the US is a large country (in area and population), with a political system that depends on a sharply divided electorate. The things you seem to think are obvious issues to tackle are actually rather controversial, and prone to demagoguing by opportunistic politicians. Congratulations on t…
(7 days after)
I'm of course aware of the political system. Thanks. My comment is about the personal statement 'cracked your European email provider, then they're not doing what we pay' which I understand that he is very much in approval of 'we pay'.
Maybe I should have restrained from the additional remarks. But I got frustrated about a fellow hacker newser kind of defending intruding friend nation companies and not willing to improve at home. (Yes I would accept that it may not be possible or easy).
[But - what a pity - the next shooting didn't wait long to happen. Maybe The Economist has a good and realistic understanding of the landscape, writing: "Those who live in America, or visit it, might do best to regard them [the Normalization of Gun Massacres] the way one regards air pollution in China: an endemic local health hazard which, for deep-rooted cultural, social, economic and political reasons, the country is incapable of addressing.". And then they continue: "This may, however, be a bit unfair. China seems to be making progress on pollution."]
Now your turn!