What I’m most scared of, though, is being left behind."
At least there is a choice. Also being creative is one of the important needs IMHO.
161–170 of 209 posts
What I’m most scared of, though, is being left behind."
At least there is a choice. Also being creative is one of the important needs IMHO.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Learning a new framework that does the same thing like layout or user design; it's not like learning music and digging into a deeper discipline like moving from acoustic strumming to jazz improvisation, it's just learning new keywords to do the same crap because the old keywords have been remapped. Perhaps you should look into Haskell, Clojure or Erlang for a change?
I love HN. In response to a complaint about learning new frameworks, you suggest three other alternatives.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I love HN. In response to a complaint about learning new frameworks, you suggest three other alternatives.
All but one are profoundly old, yet making a come back.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I reminded a co-worker last week as he was figuring out whether to use Grunt or Gulp - Computers aren't the thing. They're the thing that gets us to the thing. - Quoted from Halt and Catch Fire. Photography has its own version of the same quote. Amateurs worry about equipment, Professionals worry about time, Masters worry about light. User do not care about the technology used, they care about results.
Same thing bro with musicians, "Amateurs are gear-heads, pro's worry about techniques, and masters tries to listen to the sound"; traders/gamblers, "Amateurs focus on their winning, pro's worry about preserving their capital and masters worry about executing their performance where losing and winning money is only a side effect," and ad infinitum.
Honest, legitimate post that I very much enjoyed. However I do think posts like this feed in ageism. I say this because it posits that the change is that the author is older and has more things to do, therefore they've fallen out with technology. The take-away invariably being that people who are older and have more things to do have fallen out with technology, whereas the young are still with it, whatever it is. Let…
Most of them were 20-ish year olds."
Any idea what happened to your colleagues?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
In the context of web applications, what do Haskell or Clojure bring to the table that makes them worth the learning curve?
Ignoring the joy of writing software with much more powerful abstractions for a moment (Python, Ruby, JS, PHP all look like jalopies now compared to Haskell) out has very real industrial benefits: Write software faster with fewer bugs, easier to maintain down the road because the "mental model" is maintained in the types by the compiler, it's more succinct, it's fast, some of the world's brightest computer scientists…
Just out of curiosity: Which abstractions are we talking about here that Haskell doesn't have? OO?
All that stuff about types, functional programming, logic programming, modeling, proofs... It helps you understand things - if nothing else as a shared short hand for communication, but really as a deep set of concepts.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
All but one are profoundly old, yet making a come back.
Haskell is from the 80s. Erlang is also pretty old, and Clojure is a Lisp, the second oldest programming language around. Which is the `but one'?
Give technologies a chance to mature before you jump in. Look at what actual companies/sites are using, not just what people on HN say is cool.