Live data from Hacker News

Oculus Rift co-founder killed by gang trying to escape police

abclocal.go.com

161–170 of 309 posts

Re: Oculus Rift co-founder killed by gang trying to escape police

#161

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You seem to have confused "armed drone" with "drone".

How so? I think they're just implying that even once police drones are in use it won't necessarily deter suspects from driving erratically.

They won't even know they're there. Small, quiet drones thousands of feet up are practically invisible.

Re: Oculus Rift co-founder killed by gang trying to escape police

#162

After watching police chases on TV my whole life, I really want to know: What's the logical strategy in a police chase? Just keep driving after each other? It risks the lives of hundreds living and walking in the path of the chase all for the sake of punishing 1 or 2 individuals. It just doesn't seem to add up to me. What a shame we lost someone so brilliant for nothing.

That the risk of capture is the greatest deterrent to crime, to start? That the culprits being chased are often highly violent criminals who they don't want disappearing into the social noise? In an urban environment the number of branching permutations is enormous, so they can't simply radio ahead at the outset, and "chasing" is often simply keeping an eye on the target while supporting units move in. There are seve…

This seems correct to me. The most common example I remember was multiple incidents of fatalities resulting in police chasing joyriders.

Re: Oculus Rift co-founder killed by gang trying to escape police

#163
post #141

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You may even need to drive faster...

Implying you can spot the drone. Best police drone would simply tag the vehicle and see where it is moving around, then apprehend the fugitive one he settles for a longer period (during the night usually).

You don't need to spot the drone. If they start getting used regularly, the escapees will assume it's there and may try to evade it anyway.

Re: Oculus Rift co-founder killed by gang trying to escape police

#164
post #110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That is what "officer involved shooting" normally means — a cop shot them.

In the US this means the fleeing are accused of murder, right?

Quite possibly felony homicide (ironically). And not just the US, any common law country (e.g. most commonwealth countries).

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Felony-Murder+...

Re: Oculus Rift co-founder killed by gang trying to escape police

#165

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How so? I think they're just implying that even once police drones are in use it won't necessarily deter suspects from driving erratically.

You may even need to drive faster...

Drive until you've got some distance from the police, head underground, then switch to public transport.

Re: Oculus Rift co-founder killed by gang trying to escape police

#166
post #158
post #99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You know, police in EU normally don't chase criminals at high speed and they normally found them easily after the fact (especially if they wound/killed a cop). High speed chases are extremely rare, there is no rational need for them (and the consequent danger for passers by).

There isn't a EU wide police or justice system. It's all done at the national level. Policing standards can vary widely around countries.

Your statement is true. The parent poster's statement is also true.

Re: Oculus Rift co-founder killed by gang trying to escape police

#168
I've not been following the Oculus Rift very much, other than waiting for its release and keeping an eye on which games might support it once it's released. So I don't really know much of the history or the company.

Can someone share how Reisse was involved w/ the Oculus Rift? Looking at the company's profile[1], it makes no mention of Reisse, and lists Luckey as the "Founder".

Even searching their site[2] makes no mention of Reisse, other than a recent discussion[3] about his untimely death. And those discussions seem to only refer to him as an "employee".

Is calling him "co-founder" in the title truly accurate?

[1] http://www.oculusvr.com/company/

[2] http://www.google.com/search?q=reisse+site%3Aoculusvr.com

[3] https://developer.oculusvr.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=26&#38...

Re: Oculus Rift co-founder killed by gang trying to escape police

#169

This is a good reminder to always be a defensive and aware pedestrian. Just because you have the light or the right-of-way doesn't mean you are guaranteed a safe crossing of the street. Whenever I cross an intersection as a pedestrian I always look both ways (even on one way streets) and I always keep an eye on cars that are still in motion, especially those that don't appear to be slowing down. It's good to make the…

Frustrating, but true.

Re: Oculus Rift co-founder killed by gang trying to escape police

#170

This is a good reminder to always be a defensive and aware pedestrian. Just because you have the light or the right-of-way doesn't mean you are guaranteed a safe crossing of the street. Whenever I cross an intersection as a pedestrian I always look both ways (even on one way streets) and I always keep an eye on cars that are still in motion, especially those that don't appear to be slowing down. It's good to make the…

I've grown up in Lebanon -- a third world country still recovering from a 15 year civil war(1975-1990). Traffic lights and rules are merely suggestions to people around here. If something is physically possible, like a car being able to fit in an pedestrian-only paved road or two cars being able to fit in a one-way street you can be sure that people will do it. It becomes an innate habit to always check both ways and never assume that a car will stop or slow down or that the driver has even seen you when you're crossing the road. It's not "you might get hit" if you don't, it's "you will get hit" if you don't. It's sad, but it's true.

As an anecdote, there's a road that ends in an entrance/exit to a freeway that I use pretty frequently when driving from my home to Beirut. Two years ago, because the fact that the road was a 2-way road(people could use it to leave the freeway as well as enter it) was causing a lot of traffic they changed it into a 1-way road you could only use to enter the freeway, you had to leave from an exit further down the line. This reduced traffic jams immensely. However, before that could happen they had to go through several iterations on how to enforce this. First, a simple traffic sign was tried, this was largely ignored. Then they placed plastic barriers(those triangular things that can be filled with sand or water). Every night somebody would stop, get out of their car and move them to pass and things went back to how they were before the next day. Now they've closed it off with concrete barriers. It's working, but occasionally, especially at night, somebody will stop after the entrance, then back up into it and then use it as an exit. I once almost rear-ended someone doing that while I was going onto the freeway.

Post reply on HN