Was just checking out the Index 01 [1]: > Why can't it be recharged? > We considered this but decided not to for several reasons: > You'd probably lose the charger before the battery runs out! > Adding charge circuitry and including a charger would make the product larger and more expensive. > You send it back to us to recycle. I don't think this is true. The charging circuit could have been in the charger itself. To…
Pebble Mega Update – July 2026
161–170 of 205 posts
Re: Pebble Mega Update – July 2026
#162The ring sizing has been such a debacle, first with needing to buy (!) their special ring sizing kit because standard sizing wouldn’t be accurate they said, and now they say that the ring sizing kits weren’t true to size and suggest this: > When in doubt, order a larger size. You can always adjust a larger Index 01 to feel smaller with a foam adhesive or clip but you can’t make it larger! Size up and shim it with foa…
Re: Pebble Mega Update – July 2026
#163Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Exposed terminals would need a lot more than a single transistor. It would need ESD protection and it would change the outer case from being a complete sealed over mold into something that had to seal against two exposed terminals. That’s a big change. This is a solved problem though. Wireless earbuds can do it. We're probably just talking about a TVS diode. > For a niche, low volume product with an unknown market…
> This is a solved problem though. Wireless earbuds can do it They’re all solved problems! That doesn’t change the fact that every additional complication adds cost, complexity, failure points, more warranty returns, and time to market. Saying it’s just a transistor and a TVS ignores the hard parts like sealing the enclosure and building an entire second device to charge it. Solvable, but less so for a low volume pro…
Re: Pebble Mega Update – July 2026
#164I wonder if the functionality od Index 01 will also be available via the Pebble watch? I mean, it would be logical to allow that, all it needs is a separate app for the watch. But I didn't find any clear confirmation of this anywhere.
I am very keen to use the PT2 version. Don't need a dedicated ring.
Re: Pebble Mega Update – July 2026
#165Feels so fresh to hear their CEO talk so openly and transparently of all the flaws their products still have. Sounds like he's someone very fun to work with.
The failure rate waving is quite a stretch though. If you take into account reporting rates and time (since most people do not have the watch for long) I'm quite concerned. And I own a PT2. The "look big number, it's not a problem" does not translate to actual sensible failure rates. To be clear: 51 broken screens in less than two months results in a yearly failure rate of over 1% which is find quite high for a watch…
Re: Pebble Mega Update – July 2026
#166Earlier quoted context omitted.
I received my Time 2 recently. The original Time was my first smartwatch, which I used for maybe 7 years, until decided to sell it after briefly switching to iphone. Since then I was constantly looking for something similar in terms of capabilities and battery life. I pre-ordered my Time 2 immediately after it opened, but since then I started regretting my decision. It's quite an expensive watch, and I got used to li…
But its so cheap compared to other watches, analog watches I mean. And it is also competitively priced against other smartwatches, isn't it? The price really shouldn't feel all that bad.
Seiko doesn't seem to make the movement in my watch anymore (5M83), but the equivalent automatic-winding mechanical watch can be had for under $200 still.
Casio and Citizen sell analog watches for under $100.
Re: Pebble Mega Update – July 2026
#167Earlier quoted context omitted.
Was this a manufacturing issue or something? How do you manufacture a ring and not know what size it is / sell it to people?
to be fair, most smart rings (oura, samsung, even the cheap chinese ones on aliexpress) use ring sizing kits. it seems to be standard practice in this space.
Re: Pebble Mega Update – July 2026
#168Was just checking out the Index 01 [1]: > Why can't it be recharged? > We considered this but decided not to for several reasons: > You'd probably lose the charger before the battery runs out! > Adding charge circuitry and including a charger would make the product larger and more expensive. > You send it back to us to recycle. I don't think this is true. The charging circuit could have been in the charger itself. To…
Yeah, that's really not great at all! From their website: > Wait, it's single use? Yes. We know this sounds a bit odd, but in this particular circumstance we believe it's the best solution to the given set of constraints I don't want to be too harsh, since it seems like the pebble team are working hard at producing some exciting tech. But intentionally making a single use device is phenomenally irresponsible in today…
I assume you will use your phone for 20-40 years?
Re: Pebble Mega Update – July 2026
#169Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, that's really not great at all! From their website: > Wait, it's single use? Yes. We know this sounds a bit odd, but in this particular circumstance we believe it's the best solution to the given set of constraints I don't want to be too harsh, since it seems like the pebble team are working hard at producing some exciting tech. But intentionally making a single use device is phenomenally irresponsible in today…
A phone has 10-20x if not more weight of electronics. I assume you will use your phone for 20-40 years?
Re: Pebble Mega Update – July 2026
#170I think the reason this is so exciting to me is that it's a way to interact with technology that's a lot less "evil" feeling. I am at my best when I'm not looking at screens all day, and the index provides an off-ramp that can potentially move several common workflows off those screens. I think even on my technology-off days, using the ring would still be fine. It also looks cool, and speaking into a ring to make things happen is much more aesthetically pleasing to me than "ok google." I really think you can't discount the cool factor here.