Live data from Hacker News

Incident with Pull Requests, Issues, Git Operations and API Requests

githubstatus.com

161–170 of 221 posts

Re: Incident with Pull Requests, Issues, Git Operations and API Requests

#161

This is getting ridiculous. One particularly concerning thing I’m seeing is that pull requests on both the web UI and API aren’t reflecting all commits or branch changes consistently. It would be very easy to merge something without realizing you’re not actually reviewing the full diff.

A taste of the agenticaly-developed world.

Re: Incident with Pull Requests, Issues, Git Operations and API Requests

#164
I know it’s super fun to shit on GitHub and everyone’s favorite thing to say is “build a competitor!”

They’re trying to scale from 1 billion commits last year to over 14 billion this year. I have zero desire to try and manage that scaling. Basically being DDOS’d by agents all day now.

https://x.com/kdaigle/status/2040164759836778878

Re: Incident with Pull Requests, Issues, Git Operations and API Requests

#165

I know it’s super fun to shit on GitHub and everyone’s favorite thing to say is “build a competitor!” They’re trying to scale from 1 billion commits last year to over 14 billion this year. I have zero desire to try and manage that scaling. Basically being DDOS’d by agents all day now. https://x.com/kdaigle/status/2040164759836778878

If it were humans using the site it might be super motivating, but knowing that it's 99% bots producing AI slop, yeah I'd be looking for a new job.

Re: Incident with Pull Requests, Issues, Git Operations and API Requests

#166

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is this growth in resource usage or growth in revenue? Because those numbers aren't necessarily coupled. I.e most action runners are free

usage

There was an x post in another thread under this post that showed all the standard usage numbers are way up: 14x, 2.1x, etc. And the OP hinted at the usage growth being non-linear for 2026

Re: Incident with Pull Requests, Issues, Git Operations and API Requests

#167

is it me or ever since AI coding became the norm, there have been way more outages with otherwise reliable services? I get downtime on Supabase every few weeks. Even Cloudflare. And now Github

GitHub’s instability started when they announced they were wholesale migrating to azure. They’ve been struggling with uptime since before the enormous surge in agentic coding they’re seeing. I don’t doubt that AI has massively increased their load, but u think this is more suspect than that.

Re: Incident with Pull Requests, Issues, Git Operations and API Requests

#168

Earlier quoted context omitted.

GH was acquired by microsoft some eight years ago. It has been working quite well until recently. People may have had complaints about functionality, features, commercial issues, but the thing used to at least have a decent uptime until recently.

Has nothing to do with Microsoft acquisition... AI usage has increased demand and load. More PRs, more Action runners, more of everything firing. GitHub just wasn't ready for the scale and are now having issues catching up with it as it continues to increase exponentially.

Are you sure? Seems like they "completed" a migration about the same time all these problems started to become daily. https://www.theverge.com/tech/796119/microsoft-github-azure-...

Re: Incident with Pull Requests, Issues, Git Operations and API Requests

#169
post #6

https://isgithubcooked.com Normally I defend GH in the comments of these incidents but it’s been an impressively bad month by their standards, even when you filter for critical components filter out sev-2’s and 3’s.

Of all the sites/graphs I've seen of GH outages, this one is the most striking IMO: https://damrnelson.github.io/github-historical-uptime/ Unfortunately, it doesn't look like it's being updated with new data. But it wouldn't look any better for GH if it was.

I wonder what the cause of this was? Microsoft Politics? Bureaucracy? Forced move to azure?

Re: Incident with Pull Requests, Issues, Git Operations and API Requests

#170

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Here is a provocative thought - maybe these are the so-called "better designs" from LLMs? It's not like writing English sentences is some huge secret you are sitting on that no one else knows.

> It's not like writing English sentences is some huge secret you are sitting on that no one else knows. I'd actually say what really makes an excellent engineer stick out among many great engineers, is their ability to communicate clearly and knowing what needs to be communicated vs not, basically being way better at language and communication in general, and they also understand the important of it.

I agree. But I was talking about the "super secret" ability to write prompts, which pretty much anyone can do.
Post reply on HN