Live data from Hacker News

Chrome removes claim of On-device Al not sending data to Google Servers

old.reddit.com

161–170 of 261 posts

Re: Chrome removes claim of On-device Al not sending data to Google Servers

#161

I know that I'm in a bit of a bubble with this one, but I am surprised there is still anyone using Chrome instead of Brave. I get the dependency on Gmail other Google-specific tools, but the built-in ad blocking and Google-free aspects of it made me switch instantly and haven't look back after years.

There are other browsers that are free of both Google and sketchy cryptocurrency business!

Re: Chrome removes claim of On-device Al not sending data to Google Servers

#162

It seems to me that adding AI to desktop apps and sending the data back to the mothership for processing is an amazing way to collect data from people who, for the most part, would be completely unaware it's even happening. Heck, most of them think the Internet is Chrome.

I called this out when it was announced on here. Supposedly the team lead replied to my comment saying this wouldn't happen. I rolled my eyes but asked will android be able to use those models for ex filtration. No reply. And apparently the original claim was not true either lol. Maybe I'm misremembering it. Google is awful. My goodness. I hate Android and can't wait to be rid of it. Graphene and it's buddies can't r…

They’re all awful.

Does anyone believe a single big tech company isn’t harvesting data en masse from everyone in duplicitous manners?

Like, the best case scenario is that they don’t just blatantly steal your data and instead use dark patterns or inference to take from you without your knowledge.

And then, thanks to the wonderful opinions of the court, the government has full access to said data since you apparently knowingly agreed to giving it to a third party by virtue of the fact that you engaged in any sort of commerce.

It’s why I’m for forcing content being posted on the internet to be non anonymous and tied to a real identity.

The corporations and government already have and abuse all this data. I want the benefit of knowing when someone says “As an American {incredibly divisive shit}” that it’s actually someone in a foreign country sowing chaos for money or political aims.

Re: Chrome removes claim of On-device Al not sending data to Google Servers

#163

I still don't understand why so many people have accepting using an ad company's browser. The motivation vectors exist here to ensure that, over time, Chrome behaves in ways the end user DOES NOT WANT.

Because they don't know

(that they are an ad company (and they don't know what the implication is)).

Re: Chrome removes claim of On-device Al not sending data to Google Servers

#164

It seems to me that adding AI to desktop apps and sending the data back to the mothership for processing is an amazing way to collect data from people who, for the most part, would be completely unaware it's even happening. Heck, most of them think the Internet is Chrome.

You mean that chrome is an internet explorer?

Great joke, but taking the word literal and not as product name, it makes a lot of sense to describe chrome as a tool to explore the internet.

(Edit: thinking about it, I think generic terms like "Internet Explorer" should not be trademarkable at all, also I just learned, that also Microsoft "stole" the name and had to pay in a settlement..)

Re: Chrome removes claim of On-device Al not sending data to Google Servers

#166

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Brave started off incredibly sketchy Chrome has stayed incredibly sketchy from the beginning, when Google gained marketshare by sneaking Chrome into the installer for other products that people intentionally downloaded. Then Chrome did things like "accidentally" uploading your entire browsing history to Google servers when you signed into Gmail. Now they have declared war on ad blockers, despite the government warn…

That's a different kind of sketchy than whatever crypto ad replacement stuff that Brave was accused of doing.

The stuff brave actually did was pretty mild.

Re: Chrome removes claim of On-device Al not sending data to Google Servers

#167
Surely this would be illegal? Personal data without consent?

Or is it a case of too big too fail.

Seems like running governments' infrastructure pays off. No regulator will dare to impose a fine that could collapse the company. But this is very much needed.

£100bn fine and confiscation of assets in the given country could be a start.

Re: Chrome removes claim of On-device Al not sending data to Google Servers

#168

It seems to me that adding AI to desktop apps and sending the data back to the mothership for processing is an amazing way to collect data from people who, for the most part, would be completely unaware it's even happening. Heck, most of them think the Internet is Chrome.

> adding AI to desktop apps and sending the data back to the mothership for processing is an amazing way to collect data from people Wasn't that the entire point of Windows Recall as well?

And Siri, for that matter? https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/apple-settles-cla...

Sheesh, I'm starting to notice a pattern...

Re: Chrome removes claim of On-device Al not sending data to Google Servers

#169

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You mean that chrome is an internet explorer?

No, I think it was meant literally. Like the IT Crowd skit where Jen refers to the Internet Explorer desktop shortcut as "the button for the internet".

https://youtu.be/NUNEZ9-4v_E
Post reply on HN