Live data from Hacker News

5x5 Pixel font for tiny screens

maurycyz.com

161–168 of 168 posts

Re: 5x5 Pixel font for tiny screens

#161

Earlier quoted context omitted.

yo! thanks for sharing, this is a wicked cool device. I've always wanted a "pocket" mixer to take with me on planes and trains. I know there are smaller devices that can perform that duty but their more like repurposed EQ or audio interfaces that can be used to mix. but wowza!! $900 for that lil guy, dang!

I know, it looks incredible. It popped up on my YouTube feed and I got super excited, but then I thought "I bet this is going to be at least $800." I was wrong in the worst possible way.

I'm curious of the target audience with that price point. Wealthy hobbyists aside, any serious djays are not going to use that during a gig. Maybe as a novelty? Maybe they just haven't figured out how to scale, idk.

Can't help but think if they could sell that for, idk, $300? even $400. You'd get all kinds of people using it in fun ways.

-- ON another note, a few months back some guy posted here how he made a very simple midi device for his young daughter with a raspberry pi or the like. I do wonder if you could make a pocked-sized EQ-mixer with crossfade with this kind of interface. Do you know of anything like that?

Re: 5x5 Pixel font for tiny screens

#162

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, it's the ultra authoritarian government stopping you from viewing it. Replace "imgur.com" in the links with "rimgo.bcow.xyz" and consider voting against the parties of surveillance next time you can :)

> No, it's the ultra authoritarian government stopping you from viewing it. Wish people wouldn't keep repeating this, imgur block the UK because they were caught with GDPR violations. The fact their UK wide IP block came in around the same time as the online safety act is the only reason they can continue to quietly pretend it's the government's fault. Imgur is the reason you can't view imgur, it is not the UK Govt (…

Do you have a source for that claim? I'm curious. I genuinely thought it was the OSA.

Re: 5x5 Pixel font for tiny screens

#163

1x5 can also work if you take advantage of subpixel rendering https://www.msarnoff.org/millitext/

Actually blown away by how good that works with my 1920x1200 8-bit HP Z24n G2 monitor [1] and my Laptop's 1920x1080 6-bit Panel [2] [2x5-HP-Z24n-G2] https://i.imgur.com/yLyrpfg.jpeg [1x5-HP-Z24n-G2] https://i.imgur.com/Z7kH005.jpeg [2x5-Innolux-N156HCA-GA3] https://i.imgur.com/F4Ypxwj.jpeg [1x5-Innolux-N156HCA-GA3] https://i.imgur.com/etkot5o.jpeg [1] https://jp.ext.hp.com/monitors/business/z_z24n_g2/ [2] https://www…

I couldn't make out the 1x5 properly but the 2x5 was totally readable.

Re: 5x5 Pixel font for tiny screens

#164
post #127

This is cool, but my problem is the opposite: I have a modern laptop screen with tiny pixels. What I need is then a huge bitmap font... does anybody have any?

Why a bitmap font if you have tiny pixels? Just use a sharp font like Iosevka or similar.

i want all occurrences of the same glyph to be identical. This is essentially impossible to obtain with blurry "antialiased" fonts.

Re: 5x5 Pixel font for tiny screens

#166
Turns out, just by adding a 1 pixel border, you can (visually) turn the characters into a Aruco AR code dictionary :-) The dictionary created from the whole font does have uniqueness collisions – it depends on your use case if that is problematic. But you can create a font of AR codes that can be read by machine as well as human: https://codeberg.org/markusBM/ARuChars#readme
Post reply on HN