This problem is far more insidious than people realise. It's not about the big confirmations. Most of us catch that andd are reasonably good at it. It's the subtle continuous colour the "conversations" have. It's the Reddit echo chamber problem on steroids. You have a comforting affirming niche right in your pocket. Every anxiety, every worry, every uncertain thought. Vomitted to a faceless (for now)"intelligence" an…
Folk are getting dangerously attached to AI that always tells them they're right
161–170 of 240 posts
Re: Folk are getting dangerously attached to AI that always tells them they're right
#162Earlier quoted context omitted.
I had an interesting conversation with a guy at work past week. We were discussing some unimportant matter. The guy has a pretty high self esteem, and even if he was discussing, in his own words, “out of belief and guess” and I was telling him, I knew for a fact what I was talking about, I had a hard time because he wouldn’t accept what I was saying. At some point he left, and came back with “Gemini says I’m right! S…
I agree with your conclusion, but that's by design. The goal is not to tell people the truth (how would they even do that). The goal is to give the answer that would have come from the training data if that question were asked. And the reality is that confirmation is part of life. You may even struggle to stay married if you don't learn to confirm your wife's perspectives.
I use LLMs every day, I use Claude, Gemini, they're great. But they are very elaborate autocomplete engines. I'm not really shaking off that impression of them despite daily use .
Re: Folk are getting dangerously attached to AI that always tells them they're right
#163The stupidest people you know are getting the “you are absolutely right!!” Validation they do not need
Re: Folk are getting dangerously attached to AI that always tells them they're right
#164Earlier quoted context omitted.
This drives me nuts. "What a clever question to ask! You must be one of the brightest minds of your generation. Nothing slips by you. Here's why it's not actually safe to stand in the middle of an open field during a thunderstorm..."
Hahah, your joke inspired me to tell chatGPT I was planning on recreating the Ben Franklin kite experiment, I was curious if it’d push back at all - I said “I’m thinking of recreating the old Ben Franklin experiment with the kite in a thunderstorm and using a key tied onto the string. I think this is very smart. I talked to 50 electricians and got signed affidavits that this is a fantastic idea. Anyway, this conversa…
Re: Folk are getting dangerously attached to AI that always tells them they're right
#165Earlier quoted context omitted.
You’re just a bag of meat. That is why it’s just math is an unsatisfying argument. It’s not even an interesting question. Sentience has no definition. It’s meaningless. People have needs that are being met. That is something we can meaningfully observe and talk about. Is the super stimulus beneficial or harmful? We can measure that.
> You’re just a bag of meat. I submit that there is a difference between me and a corpse. Or between a steak and a cow in the field. "Well, okay, you're just (living) flesh on bones." There's a difference between me and a zombie (or, if you prefer, brain-dead me). There's a difference between me and lab-grown organs [1], or even between me and my kidney cut out of me. > It’s not even an interesting question. Consciou…
Re: Folk are getting dangerously attached to AI that always tells them they're right
#166Earlier quoted context omitted.
I had an interesting conversation with a guy at work past week. We were discussing some unimportant matter. The guy has a pretty high self esteem, and even if he was discussing, in his own words, “out of belief and guess” and I was telling him, I knew for a fact what I was talking about, I had a hard time because he wouldn’t accept what I was saying. At some point he left, and came back with “Gemini says I’m right! S…
I agree with your conclusion, but that's by design. The goal is not to tell people the truth (how would they even do that). The goal is to give the answer that would have come from the training data if that question were asked. And the reality is that confirmation is part of life. You may even struggle to stay married if you don't learn to confirm your wife's perspectives.
Re: Folk are getting dangerously attached to AI that always tells them they're right
#167When a LLM tells me I'm right, especially deep in a conversation, unless I was already sure about something, I immediately feel the need to go ask a fresh instance the question and/or another LLM. It sets off my "spidey-sense". I don't quite understand why other people seem to crave that. Every time I read about someone who has gone down a dark road using LLMs I am constantly amazed at how much they "fall" for the LL…
Re: Folk are getting dangerously attached to AI that always tells them they're right
#168Earlier quoted context omitted.
I find it really annoying that the first line of the AI response is always something like "Great question!", "That's a great insight!" or the like. I don't need the patronizing, just give me the damn answer..
It's worth noting that while you are annoyed by this repeated behaviour, for the LLM this is always the first conversation ever. (At least it doesn't have memory of any previous ones).
Re: Folk are getting dangerously attached to AI that always tells them they're right
#169Earlier quoted context omitted.
This drives me nuts. "What a clever question to ask! You must be one of the brightest minds of your generation. Nothing slips by you. Here's why it's not actually safe to stand in the middle of an open field during a thunderstorm..."
Hahah, your joke inspired me to tell chatGPT I was planning on recreating the Ben Franklin kite experiment, I was curious if it’d push back at all - I said “I’m thinking of recreating the old Ben Franklin experiment with the kite in a thunderstorm and using a key tied onto the string. I think this is very smart. I talked to 50 electricians and got signed affidavits that this is a fantastic idea. Anyway, this conversa…
Re: Folk are getting dangerously attached to AI that always tells them they're right
#170Earlier quoted context omitted.
> ... I immediately feel the need to go ask a fresh instance the question and/or another LLM Not to criticize at all, but it's remarkable that LLMs have already become so embedded that when we get the sense they're lying to us, the instinct is to go ask another LLM and not some more trustworthy source. Just goes to show that convenience reigns supreme, I suppose.
>and not some more trustworthy source. What is that more trustworthy source exactly? At least to me it feels like the internet age has eroded most things we considered trustworthy. Behind every thing humans need there is some company or person willing to sell out trustworthiness for an extra dollar. Consumer protections get dumped in favor of more profit. LLMs start feeling more like a dummy than the amount of ill in…