Live data from Hacker News

2026 tech layoffs reach 45,000 in March

technode.global

161–164 of 164 posts

Re: 2026 tech layoffs reach 45,000 in March

#161

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It takes time to correct 10 years of ZIRP, plus COVID overhiring that doubled the headcount of those 10 years in just 2-3. The jig was up when social media like Reddit and tiktok during the pandemic was full of posts with big tech workers gloating about getting hired for six figure salaries to sleep in and play video games at home while putting in 2 hours of work a week, obvious to anyone with two neurons to rub toge…

> Further reinforced with Elon firing 80% of Twitter and the website didn't stop working, reminding big tech CEOs that they can also start looking into trimming the overhiring fat in their back yard, with no operational loss. I would argue Twitter is in a worse state operationally, but either way it’s moot because one simply has to look at the company’s valuation since Musk took over to see things aren’t going well.…

That's not how successful CEOs think.

X doesn't seem to be in any worse state operationally. The site's uptime is fine, and they've launched a ton of new features that were well received by the userbase. So: 80% fewer people, site remains operational, new feature launches have if anything accelerated. That is a success by any companies measure.

The left is now trying to rewrite history and claim the fall in valuation is because Musk took it over, but it's not. Twitter's valuation was already falling rapidly before Musk entered the game at all. Like many tech firms its price had a COVID surge. The valuations of multiple tech companies were fell sharply right as he was in the middle of the acquisition. The timing was unlucky and he overpaid. That's why he tried to back out of the deal and, if you remember, why the Twitter board went to court to force him to acquire the company against his will.

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-62102821

> There are other potential reasons why Mr Musk might want to pull out of the deal. The stock market price for large tech companies has fallen steeply in the last few months - did Musk offer too much?

The subsequent advertiser boycott says nothing about whether you can cut a company like Twitter by 80% and still have it function. That was caused by Musk publicly rejecting leftist claims as false. CEOs don't care about that because they can cut employees whilst claiming to be increasing diversity and the left will leave them alone.

Re: 2026 tech layoffs reach 45,000 in March

#162

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They have an app for it. I think it's as accessible as any of the other models you mentioned. It's just not as good.

Not so good right now but they haven't released one in a while. Llama 3.1 was pretty great when it came out.

Yeah strategy is weird. PyTorch and llama 1-3 were strong successes. Llama 4 was a dud but that happens sometimes. Google fumbles a few times before Gemini too. What I don’t get is why they didn’t prioritize those projects. They weren’t making money, but it was a solid start and a good way to get a foothold in the game. Instead they’ve gone balls deep in slop bullshit.

Re: 2026 tech layoffs reach 45,000 in March

#164
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

also just another clear ripoff. they copy, they acquire, but they cannot seem to innovate.

Meta seem fairly innovative. Their r&d labs seem to produce some really cool things. The basic issue is none of it seems to be making any money when it ends up in products and services. Main reason there seems to be that their walled garden approach is tolerated at best. They just aren't very good at it outside of a feed.

yeah, i'm referring to product innovations, but i should've made that explicit.
Post reply on HN