Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why not? Assuming you want one of the sides to win, why would you not want your side to use every (ethical) means available to do that?
War is not ethical.
Starlink militarization and its impact on global strategic stability (2023)
161–170 of 263 posts
Re: Starlink militarization and its impact on global strategic stability (2023)
#162While there is a massive US advantage in space launch, it should be used to the maximum. It's not going to last forever (while perhaps, sufficiently long that China fizzles out demographically before it's gone).
To be honest, I think US demographic trends are a lot worse than whatever is going on with China.
Re: Starlink militarization and its impact on global strategic stability (2023)
#163It's not great that they found starlink terminals on Russian drones (they've since tried to lock them down more). These should be export controlled and geo-locked as they are arguably much more powerful than any missile.
The DoD has always been deeply involved in running Starlink there
Re: Starlink militarization and its impact on global strategic stability (2023)
#164Earlier quoted context omitted.
> All in all, I would rather live in a somewhat free America than in communist China. The last 15 years has significantly changed peoples' opinions on that matter. https://data.worldhappiness.report/chart Let's see how the next 15 goes.
The last 15 years has significantly changed peoples' opinions on that matter. I’m gonna need to see some immigration statistics on influx of foreigners into the PRC to believe that claim.
Re: Starlink militarization and its impact on global strategic stability (2023)
#165It's not great that they found starlink terminals on Russian drones (they've since tried to lock them down more). These should be export controlled and geo-locked as they are arguably much more powerful than any missile.
Especially in light of that early war elon confession about disabling terminals mid Ukraine op. Another not great data point is https://militarnyi.com/en/news/ukraine-starlink-data-traffic... "Starlink satellite traffic in Ukraine fell by about 75% after SpaceX shut down its terminals in the occupied territories of the country." By now it came to light russians for example had starlinks on every assaulting tank in ad…
The only reason Ukraine complained was their special ops were running drone boats deep in Russian territory. After they asked for permission (following this controversy) SpaceX did a deal with DoD to let them manage those special cases allowing its use behind enemy lines.
Starlink has been nothing but positive for Ukraine
Re: Starlink militarization and its impact on global strategic stability (2023)
#166The dual-use problem with Starlink is really just the most visible version of something happening across the military. Phones with civilian GPS chips are increasingly used alongside dedicated mil-spec hardware, simply because the commercial stuff is more usable and gets updated faster. The real strategic question isn't whether Starlink can be weaponized - of course it can - it's what happens when military operations…
There’s obviously a few areas where this isn’t really true, like a foreign company setting up a US company to sell their product, but by and large the US is immune to the risks you describe. China similarly makes most of their own systems and is mostly immune. A large scale WW3 between the US and China cannot be stopped by a company refusing to participate.
Re: Starlink militarization and its impact on global strategic stability (2023)
#167Earlier quoted context omitted.
The other consideration is that the kill switch is ultimately controlled by the US. The US government can easily commandeer Starlink or jail Musk, but other countries use starlink at the pleasure of both Musk and the US government.
That's the part that makes allied nations nervous. If you're running military comms through Starlink and the US decides to play hardball in some trade dispute, your entire C2 network just became a bargaining chip. Ukraine showed how quickly access decisions become political. I think we'll see European and Asian allies start investing in their own LEO constellations specifically because of this - nobody wants their mi…
This is explicitly one reason the US marketed the F-35 so hard to their allies. In addition to giving their allies a good capability, it made their air force dependent on continuing US support, so politicians wishing to go against US positions have to be willing to sacrifice their military power to do so. This gives the US a strong lever in negotiating.
Re: Starlink militarization and its impact on global strategic stability (2023)
#168Recently this was cut off suddenly, with an immediate counter attack by Ukraine... along with Ukraine trolling the shit out of Russia frontline operatives; offering fake "recover your Starlink connection" websites and texts, scamming them out of their account credentials.
Great episode to go watch. I can't imagine how Russia thought this was a good idea?
Re: Starlink militarization and its impact on global strategic stability (2023)
#169I watch CappyArmy on YouTube. Was shocked recently to learn that Russia had widely deployed StarLink in Ukraine to get orders to the front lines. Recently this was cut off suddenly, with an immediate counter attack by Ukraine... along with Ukraine trolling the shit out of Russia frontline operatives; offering fake "recover your Starlink connection" websites and texts, scamming them out of their account credentials. G…
Re: Starlink militarization and its impact on global strategic stability (2023)
#170I watch CappyArmy on YouTube. Was shocked recently to learn that Russia had widely deployed StarLink in Ukraine to get orders to the front lines. Recently this was cut off suddenly, with an immediate counter attack by Ukraine... along with Ukraine trolling the shit out of Russia frontline operatives; offering fake "recover your Starlink connection" websites and texts, scamming them out of their account credentials. G…
[flagged]