Live data from Hacker News

President Trump bans Anthropic from use in government systems

npr.org

161–170 of 229 posts

Re: President Trump bans Anthropic from use in government systems

#161

This should come as no surprise. The administration has no tolerance for anyone with “values” or “scruples” that challenge their power. They fired Judge Advocate Generals (military lawyers) that refused to authorize strikes on civilian boats, for one recent example. If you say ‘no’ for any reason, they fire you.

The administration has no tolerance for anyone...who refuses to get their knees dirty.

Re: President Trump bans Anthropic from use in government systems

#162

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Despite the complete Archie Bunker energy in that post here is something interesting from the post: "Anthropic better get their act together, and be helpful during this phase out period, or I will use the Full Power of the Presidency to make them comply, with major civil and criminal consequences to follow." with major civil and criminal consequences to follow. WTF !!!

I’d love to get the reaction if all the VC investors who “reluctantly” had to support Trump because Lina Kahn was just too meddlesome, and they had to support a candidate who would be hands off with big tech.

Leopards, faces

Re: President Trump bans Anthropic from use in government systems

#163
post #112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am honestly surprised he is being this nice given he could use the war powers act and eminent domain to just seize the company and conscript their employees. I am sure someone will say that is not legal but when has that stopped anyone. What I don't get is why they really want it. I can't think of a worse platform in general to do anything with combat that is, anything in a data-center . I would take the Quake 3 Ar…

> I am sure someone will say that is not legal but when has that stopped anyone. it has routinely stopped them as the courts have already struck down countless of nonsense by this administration, and they rely exactly on this bluster every time they try something else. The issue is that even though courts work slower than a president with a smartphone eventually it will all get sorted out and they know this, which is…

He simply ignores the courts.

Re: President Trump bans Anthropic from use in government systems

#164
post #77

Something interesting is going on around Trump's rants. Some White House staffers are directing lower-level staff to ignore them and focus on the economy. James Blair [2] seems to be leading this. Blair was in charge of political strategy for Trump's campaign, and he won, so he's probably not going to be fired. There have been presidents in decline who were semi-captured by their staffs. Biden, Reagan, and Roosevelt…

Yeah, then they can start using the auto pen to sign the orders and legislation right?

Re: President Trump bans Anthropic from use in government systems

#166
post #120

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No end here. The administration can still go above and beyond in an attempt to completely wreck Anthropic.

Could you expand on this? What mechanism? Any examples?

I would think it pretty clear that they aren't shy about making their displeasure loudly and concretely known when denied. I can imagine an executive order in the research or draft state that'll make it so any entity that continues to deal with Anthropic is automatically put at a disadvantage. Something similar in spirit and effect to the sanctions on Cuba.

Re: President Trump bans Anthropic from use in government systems

#169

Why the fuck does the president have authority to set specific IT policy for the government. He might not even have it, he loves making policies he doesn’t actually have the authority to make.

Who else should have that authority?

Re: President Trump bans Anthropic from use in government systems

#170
post #40

Would love nothing more than for sama to refuse government contracts in solidarity. Free enterprise isn’t free

Oh yeah he's refusing out of solidarity alright :eyeroll:

https://x.com/sama/status/2027578652477821175?s=20

Tonight, we reached an agreement with the Department of War to deploy our models in their classified network.

In all of our interactions, the DoW displayed a deep respect for safety and a desire to partner to achieve the best possible outcome.

AI safety and wide distribution of benefits are the core of our mission. Two of > our most important safety principles are prohibitions on domestic mass surveillance and human responsibility for the use of force, including for autonomous weapon systems. The DoW agrees with these principles, reflects them in law and policy, and we put them into our agreement.

We also will build technical safeguards to ensure our models behave as they should, which the DoW also wanted. We will deploy FDEs to help with our models and to ensure their safety, we will deploy on cloud networks only.

We are asking the DoW to offer these same terms to all AI companies, which in our opinion we think everyone should be willing to accept. We have expressed our > strong desire to see things de-escalate away from legal and governmental actions and towards reasonable agreements.

We remain committed to serve all of humanity as best we can. The world is a complicated, messy, and sometimes dangerous place.

Amazing / weird that this sounds like a lot of the stuff Amodei said Anthropic asked for

Post reply on HN