Live data from Hacker News

GitHub is down again

githubstatus.com

161–170 of 425 posts

Re: GitHub is down again

#161
the incident has now expanded to include webhooks, git operations, actions, general page load + API requests, issues, and pull requests. they're effectively down hard.

hopefully its down all day. we need more incidents like this to happen for people to get a glimpse of the future.

Re: GitHub is down again

#162
We replaced everything except the git part because of reliability issues. Pages…gone Actions…gone KB…gone. Tickets…gone.

Maybe they need to get more humans involved because GitHub is down at least once a week for a while now.

Re: GitHub is down again

#163

Earlier quoted context omitted.

have you considered moving or having at least an alternative? asking as someone using caddy for personal hosting who likes to have their website secure. :)

> have you considered moving or having at least an alternative Not who you're responding to, but my 2 cents: for a popular open-source project reliant on community contributions there is really no alternative. It's similar to social media - we all know it's trash and noxious, but if you're any kind of public figure you have to be there.

Several quite big projects have moved to Codeberg. I have no idea how it has worked out for them.

Re: GitHub is down again

#164
post #6

Of course they're down while I'm trying to address a "High severity" security bug in Caddy but all I'm getting is a unicorn when loading the report. (Actually there's 3 I'm currently working, but 2 are patched already, still closing the feedback loop though.) I have a 2-hour window right now that is toddler free. I'm worried that the outage will delay the feedback loop with the reporter(s) into tomorrow and ultimatel…

have you considered moving or having at least an alternative? asking as someone using caddy for personal hosting who likes to have their website secure. :)

We can of course host our code elsewhere, the problem is the community is kind of locked-in. It would be very "expensive" to move, and would have to be very worthwhile. So far the math doesn't support that kind of change.

Usually an outage is not a big deal, I can still work locally. Today I just happen to be in a very GH-centric workflow with the security reports and such.

I'm curious how other maintainers maintain productivity during GH outages.

Re: GitHub is down again

#166
post #136
post #78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Github lost at least one 9, if not two, since last year's "existential" migration to Azure.

Is there any reason why Github needs 99.99% uptime? You can continue working with your local repo.

What if you need to deploy to production urgently...

Re: GitHub is down again

#167

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Fucking REALLY?!

Migrations of Actions and Copilot to Azure completed in 2024. Pages and Packages completed in 2025. Core platform and databases began in October 2025 and are in progress, with traffic split between the legacy Github data center and Azure.

That's probably partly why things have got increasingly flaky - until they finish there'll be constant background cognitive load and surface area for bugs from the fact everything (especially the data) is half-migrated

Re: GitHub is down again

#168
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

At its core antitrust cases are about monopolies and how companies use anti-competitive conduct to maintain their monopoly. Github isn't the only source control software in the market. Unless they're doing something obvious and nefarious, its doubtful the justice department will step in when you can simply choose one of many others like Bitbucket, Sourcetree, Gitlab, SVN, CVS, Fossil, DARCS, or Bazaar. There's just t…

Can they use Github to their advantage to maintain a monopoly if they are nefarious? Think about it.

Unfortunately the question is "have they", not "can they".

Re: GitHub is down again

#169
post #113
post #74

What are good alternatives to GitHub for private repos + actions? I'm considering moving my company off of it because of reliablity issues.

Don't listen to the clueless suggesting Gitlab. It's forgejo (not gitea) or tangled, that's it.

> clueless suggesting Gitlab

ad hominem isn't a very convincing argument, and as someone who also enjoys forgejo it doesn't make me feel good to see as the justification for another recommender.

Post reply on HN