Earlier quoted context omitted.
The fact that this is downvoted really says it all. "I don't read the news" is pretty much dependent on one's profession being insulated from changing events. Which is not surprising why it's a popular opinion amongst technocrats that would rather not have democracy in the first place.
> on one's profession being insulated Even this is privilege. Try "one's identity". Last year, legal immigrants were fine. Today, their kids are kidnapped and used as bait to take them to Alcatraz. And that's not even the identity I'm mostly referring to. Very cool stance OOP, thank you for identifying yourself as the type of centrist heaven will reject at the gate and angels will never get tired of the reaction to t…
I stopped following the news
161–170 of 205 posts
Re: I stopped following the news
#162I completely understand why, but on the other hand democracy relies on citizens being informed about what's happening. The risk is that one day, you wake up and there is no democracy any more.
Also - and maybe I'm naive for this - I don't really need news to inform my political opinion because the current state of affairs is so far from my ideal world. Like no matter what could reasonably occur in the news, I still know who I'm voting for on polling day.
Re: I stopped following the news
#163Earlier quoted context omitted.
you could read wikipedia news: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Current_events
How does Wikipedia rank compared to news gathered by professional journalists and editors such as those at The Economist as mentioned?
Re: I stopped following the news
#164Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would like a weekly physical Sunday paper with some general news and printed substack articles tailored to me.
I’ve been kicking around an idea for a while now that’s basically a no-headlines, curated (generally long-form) media aggregation site. No algorithm, no personalization, no AI. Just topics you can choose to follow. The basic idea is you get one article at a time fed to you (no headline scrolling like Reddit or HN), and doesn’t let you proceed to the next article until you’ve scrolled through at least x% of the curren…
Re: I stopped following the news
#165I think it's important to keep reading the news occasionally. Personally, I, as a programmer, read the news in the same way as my grandad who was a farmer. I read a printed weekly publication (in my case The Economist) on Sunday morning. Outside of Sunday morning I don't read the news at all. I prefer printed news to media-supported news, because I think the imagery (I acknowledge The Economist still has images) and…
I would like a weekly physical Sunday paper with some general news and printed substack articles tailored to me.
Re: I stopped following the news
#166I think it's important to keep reading the news occasionally. Personally, I, as a programmer, read the news in the same way as my grandad who was a farmer. I read a printed weekly publication (in my case The Economist) on Sunday morning. Outside of Sunday morning I don't read the news at all. I prefer printed news to media-supported news, because I think the imagery (I acknowledge The Economist still has images) and…
"Outside of Sunday morning I don't read the news at all." Excerpt from comment submitted to Hacker News, an online news aggregator On Wednesday Is Hacker News news
Re: I stopped following the news
#167Re: I stopped following the news
#168I think it's important to keep reading the news occasionally. Personally, I, as a programmer, read the news in the same way as my grandad who was a farmer. I read a printed weekly publication (in my case The Economist) on Sunday morning. Outside of Sunday morning I don't read the news at all. I prefer printed news to media-supported news, because I think the imagery (I acknowledge The Economist still has images) and…
you could read wikipedia news: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Current_events
1) Essential to not have missed for everyday conversation;
2) Will affect my decision making in some way;
3) Will be remembered a year later.
There is simply far too much news.
Re: I stopped following the news
#169I still want to be informed and be involved especially in matters that do impact me and the country I live in; I feel strongly about democracy and that rests on an educated and participatory citizenship. But I don't need to wade through shit every day to have enough of an understanding of it.
I like tech and I'm curious, but just today before reading this article I was thinking about how much do I really gain from this cursory reading on so many subjects (as one might find on HN), instead of using the time to more deeply dive into certain ones. At some point it can become a bunch of clutter that has little value.
(I already stopped watching TV news many years ago, and dropped Facebook and Reddit a few years ago as well. I'm mostly down to Instagram and HN, plus the NYT and a few magazines (MIT Tech Review, that one is excellent; Wired, was planning on dropped anyway; Atlantic, good but I don't need that much of it; The New Yorker has great longform every once in a while.)
Re: I stopped following the news
#170My approach:
* world: weekly Economist coverage of world/biz/general topics (audio via app) - keeps me generally up to date
* local: daily digest mail of notable news from yesterday from my country (which is too insignificant to appear in the Economist); scraped from multiple sources, digest by an LLM
* Hacker News digest mail, top 50 posts from the previous day (drawback is I'm often late to the discussion, like with this one, but can also be a blessing)
* ArsTechnica digest - used to be a subscriber but nowadays just grab new article links once a day
I read the digests as my "morning paper", and skip most of the links there (from ~100 in total I end up reading ~10), but am still "in the loop"
I also find about stuff in conversations with friends and social media (x/bsky/li for me). I also try to minimize the latter, but that's for another comment :)