Live data from Hacker News

The tech monoculture is finally breaking

jasonwillems.com

161–170 of 349 posts

Re: The tech monoculture is finally breaking

#161

> Art Deco is in vogue Is it? I wish it was, but what is the author referencing?

Neo Deco is growing in popularity. There's a few youtube channels dedicated to art deco restoration and influencers showing off art deco motifs in their homes that have spurred the trend.

It's just the slow swing of the pendulum away from the AirSpace aesthetic that was the modern interpretation of mid-century modern that came out of the early 2000s.

Author is a hipster.

Re: The tech monoculture is finally breaking

#162
post #137

> Meta shipped a wearable that normal people actually use Literally the only time I've heard of anyone using these in the wild was some guy being an absolute creep and using them to secretly film women to create social media content[1]. [1] https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx23ke7rm7go

There are two claims you're making 1) they're rarely used 2) when they are it's nefarious To the first point, they've sold at least 2M pairs, and are reported scaling production to handle up to 10M units per year. To the second point, do you believe that all or most of those 2M people using it for those purposes? Or to take videos of travel, music festivals, etc. Lots of companies are rushing into this space, so you…

> To the first point, they've sold at least 2M pairs, and are reported scaling production to handle up to 10M units per year

Im actually very curious to learn more about the usage statistics of their glasses overall. I live in SF and I have noticed 1 person wearing them in the wild. Its obviously probable that Ive missed a handful, but my suspicion is that a lot of people wear them for short bursts of time, for specific events.

Re: The tech monoculture is finally breaking

#163
post #97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, there's SV's favorite minimalist hardware (along with the overpriced woop band): https://bemighty.com/

That's an MP3-player, right? It looks like they go overboard to call this an offline Spotify device, instead of what it is. Or am I missing something?

It's an overpriced MP3 player with a DRM token cache to decrypt Spotify streams.

Re: The tech monoculture is finally breaking

#164

Earlier quoted context omitted.

not sure if you mean sonic and knuckles or the company that made king of fighters or something else.

Interesting, I took SnK to mean Attack on Titan (Shingeki no Kyojin). I personally wouldn’t put it in a list of manga/anime that will be nostalgic in 20 years, but who knows.

I meant in an Akira sort of way in the West (in Japan, I'd say Gintama has a much more lasting impact than any other anime in the last 20 years).

Re: The tech monoculture is finally breaking

#166
post #148

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I looked pretty hard - I specifically don’t want an android OS called an mp3 player. I want a dedicated media player that has physical button controls (not touch screen), is very snappy, has a good UI, and has a purpose-built OS There are a lot of DAPs in this style. They're just not popular because the Android-based units are perfectly fine and don't feel like Android phones with an MP3 player app installed. Most…

They likely want to use the device without looking at it, thus the requirement is physical buttons not a specific OS. It’s the same issue with touch screens in cars. Anything that’s a touchscreen simply fails a core MP3 player requirement for many people.

Yup. I want to be able to use it to listen to music, start/stop/pause/skip/volume while I'm at the dentist.

Re: The tech monoculture is finally breaking

#167
post #67
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

iOS. Do a 1 time clean up by manually turning everything off. And then decline for every app you install after that. I can’t believe I used to be one of those people who got every single email delivered to their smart watch.

> And then decline for every app you install after that. That's what I already have. And that's what I find painful. I don't want to have to decline at every install. I want a setting that is the default, and no prompts to grant permissions when I install.

How often are you installing apps that it's that frustrating?

Re: The tech monoculture is finally breaking

#168

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> You cannot buy a dedicated MP3 player today with the software polish and quality of life that an iPod had in the early 2000s I could see how many people would assume this, but it’s actually false. There’s actually a big selection of dedicated audio players that do the job very well now. The battery life and audio quality are extremely good because there’s a niche market for them with a lot of competition. If you th…

I looked pretty hard - I specifically don’t want an android OS called an mp3 player. I want a dedicated media player that has physical button controls (not touch screen), is very snappy, has a good UI, and has a purpose-built OS specific to only playing songs and podcasts, and maybe movies, which I can sync with my computer (maybe with rsync or whatever else). No apps. The only option that I could find was an iPod cl…

Swofy makes a little media player that has physical buttons; the crowd here at home really likes them: https://a.co/d/9icRCCs

Re: The tech monoculture is finally breaking

#169
post #107

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> "I'm tied of Apple converting everything to services so I'll eschew the Apple Watch in favor of an analog watch and an Oura ring that requires a subscription." I wouldn't pay a subscription to Oura, especially with them moving towards a more obfuscated view of individual metrics. I'm grandfathered in to a lifetime subscription. And eagerly awaiting something comparable in the market, but reviews of competing produc…

The over arching theme of your article is "tech is fun again because we're escaping the monoculture" but there's a strong unspoken signaling of "look at how cool I am". You're saying "my tech choices signal discernment." You've got this curated counterculture vibe of being off mainstream by being on different mainstream platforms. The shifts taking place are all reminiscent of the shift from Windows to Apple that sta…

> there's a strong unspoken signaling of "look at how cool I am"

I think tech should feel cool to the person using it, but it won't make a person cool either way. And it's an odd thing to fixate on.

> You're saying "my tech choices signal discernment."

I'm saying I have choices (at least, relative to earlier). I can use a Mac (or not) and that can tell you much less about the type of phone I have than a would have a few years ago.

> Bambu Labs is the new 3d printer monoculture. Meta is the AR monoculture

Then it's not really monoculture? It's narrow rather than cross-all-domains. I'm fine is there's a "toaster brand" everyone buys, or everyone likes Dyson vacuums, as long as it's not Apple producing it.

From what I see there appear to plenty of alternatives to Bambu. Instead of smugly calling people amoral because they bought a popular 3D printer, why not explain what's wrong with Bambu? I still genuinely don't know the criticism. Is it proprietary formats? Banning IP infringing content on their store? DRM? Industry lobbying for something nefarious? Lawfare? What is it that are they doing...?

> To me this article reads as soft elitism

Wouldn't the Apple bro archetype signal this more strongly? I think you may have seen a Leica in the list and way over-indexed on that, while it's actually at quite old D-LUX Typ-109 (not much newer than the Canon it replaces).

And I think the smug condescension throughout the response is closer to a kind of elitism, no?

> side of mid-life crisis

Hopefully I'm not at mid-life quite yet, and definitely not in crisis. That aside, I’m not sure it's useful to frame a critique of an article that way.

Re: The tech monoculture is finally breaking

#170
post #127

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Gen Z buying iPods and people buying N64 games again is not evidence of the monoculture breaking apart - it's a retreat into the past for the enlightened few because their needs are not being met by modern goods and services It's simpler than that - retro is an (a e s t h e t i c) Those of us who are Zillenials, Gen Z, or Gen Alpha were still in elementary school or not around when those products were mainstream. I…

> It's simpler than that - retro is an (a e s t h e t i c) I think I agree. But I also think a second order consequence of this is chipping away at the standalone ecosystems (Apple, Google, etc). Even a small contingent of user demand spins up new (or renewed) categories, and that fuels a healthier tech environment

[deleted]
Post reply on HN