Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't really see any mentioning of a new API, beyond their Vertex AI thing, and I don't know how comparable that might be. Also it is capped at 50 domains (by default). It is perhaps a clever legal workaround. They must sell access to their index, but the verdict didn't state how much of it you can buy access to at any one time. So they put a limit of 50 domains, because that accommodates everyone who's not a searc…
It's only a "clever" workaround in a captured legal system that isn't interested in anti-monopoly outcomes. Any competent legal system would slap that shit down. Just the thought that they could "hack this ruling with one weird trick" is infuriating.
Updates to our web search products and Programmable Search Engine capabilities
161–170 of 207 posts
Re: Updates to our web search products and Programmable Search Engine capabilities
#162Google quietly announced that Programmable Search (ex-Custom Search) won’t allow new engines to “search the entire web” anymore. New engines are capped at searching up to 50 domains, and existing full-web engines have until Jan 1, 2027 to transition. If you actually need whole-web search, Google now points you to an “interest form” for enterprise solutions (Vertex AI Search etc.), with no public pricing and no guaran…
I know that duckduckgo uses Microsoft Bing Custom search and honestly it is a much more robust system since you don't have to worry about Google axing it. https://www.customsearch.ai
Re: Updates to our web search products and Programmable Search Engine capabilities
#163Re: Updates to our web search products and Programmable Search Engine capabilities
#164Earlier quoted context omitted.
Instead you worry about Microsoft axing it? Sure, it might take 3 years instead of 6 months, and the shutdown period would be 1 year instead of 1 month, but hardly either are long-term solutions.
> it might take 3 years instead of 6 months, and the shutdown period would be 1 year instead of 1 month This matters much more than people (and evidently those within Google) realize
Re: Updates to our web search products and Programmable Search Engine capabilities
#165Google quietly announced that Programmable Search (ex-Custom Search) won’t allow new engines to “search the entire web” anymore. New engines are capped at searching up to 50 domains, and existing full-web engines have until Jan 1, 2027 to transition. If you actually need whole-web search, Google now points you to an “interest form” for enterprise solutions (Vertex AI Search etc.), with no public pricing and no guaran…
https://dn710204.ca.archive.org/0/items/gov.uscourts.dcd.223...
Re: Updates to our web search products and Programmable Search Engine capabilities
#166Dumb question: I keep seeing posts about how ~"the volume of AI scrapers is making hosting untenable." There must a ton of new full-web datasets out there, right? What are the major hurdles that prevent the owners of these datasets from providing them to third parties via API? Is it the quality of SERP, or staleness? Otherwise, this seems like a potentially lucrative pivot/side hustle?
> the volume of AI scrapers is making hosting untenable Aside from that potential, it's also not true. A Pentium Pro or PIII SSE with circa 1998-99 Apache happily delivers a billion hits a month w/o breaking a sweat unless you think generating pages for every visit is better than generating pages when they change.
Re: Updates to our web search products and Programmable Search Engine capabilities
#167Google quietly announced that Programmable Search (ex-Custom Search) won’t allow new engines to “search the entire web” anymore. New engines are capped at searching up to 50 domains, and existing full-web engines have until Jan 1, 2027 to transition. If you actually need whole-web search, Google now points you to an “interest form” for enterprise solutions (Vertex AI Search etc.), with no public pricing and no guaran…
I built my own web search index on bare metal, index now up to 34m docs: https://greppr.org/ People rely too much on other people's infra and services, which can be decommissioned anytime. The Google Graveyard is real.
Re: Updates to our web search products and Programmable Search Engine capabilities
#168Earlier quoted context omitted.
Congrats on saying that in the most one-sided way possible. Google makes it literally impossible for them to pay for access to search results to make the product they want (customizable subscription search with no ads), and Google also is the de-facto globally sanctioned crawler because they are the only search engine anyone gives a shit about, and also sites need to be indexed by them to survive. In short, Google ow…
>In short, Google owns the river and sells the boats, and the public built a wall around it. That would be a monopoly if there was only 1 river in the whole world.
Re: Updates to our web search products and Programmable Search Engine capabilities
#169Earlier quoted context omitted.
I built my own web search index on bare metal, index now up to 34m docs: https://greppr.org/ People rely too much on other people's infra and services, which can be decommissioned anytime. The Google Graveyard is real.
That's super cool! Do you have any plans to commercialize it or it's just a pet project?
Re: Updates to our web search products and Programmable Search Engine capabilities
#170I'm curious about what it would take to build my own "toy" search engine with its own index. Anyone ever tried this?
Yeah that's where I started out in 2021. Been at it for almost 5 years now, last three of which full time. I'm indexing about 1.1 billion documents now off a single server. Hard part is doing it at any sort of scale and producing useful results. It's easy to build something that indexes a few million documents. Pushing into billions is a bigger challenge, as you start needing a lot of increasingly intricate bespoke s…