iOS 26.3 brings AirPods-like pairing to third-party devices in EU under DMA
161–170 of 352 posts
Re: iOS 26.3 brings AirPods-like pairing to third-party devices in EU under DMA
#162Earlier quoted context omitted.
A company that produces a wireless mouse that charges upside down really does not care about user experience.
Steve Jobs loved the iMac's terrible hockey puck mouse. Jony Ive is probably to blame for the terrible (yet very thin) butterfly keyboard making it into Apple laptops. However, these missteps do not prove that Apple doesn't care about user experience.
That was never proven. Although their PR response was atrocious.
Re: iOS 26.3 brings AirPods-like pairing to third-party devices in EU under DMA
#163Re: iOS 26.3 brings AirPods-like pairing to third-party devices in EU under DMA
#164It’s fascinating the kind of cool features we can have when products are made to be useful, with their target user in mind. Go EU!
Or it disincentivizes creating those features, if you must give it to your competitors.
Re: iOS 26.3 brings AirPods-like pairing to third-party devices in EU under DMA
#165Earlier quoted context omitted.
I really don't understand people who defend Apple on this. The only reason I can imagine is that they're shareholders who don't use any Apple products, or shareholders who use exclusively Apple products and can't understand what sort of poor scrub might want an accessory not made by them.
It's the second one, but without being shareholders.
Taking a further step back, this same group of HN users probably understands the straightforward idea that what’s good for Bay Area tech companies is beneficial to them in a much broader sense, since they’re generally employed by them or by a very small group of other companies closely related to them.
You can accuse them of being greedy, selfish, or whatever, but certainly not that they’re unaware of where their interests lie.
Re: iOS 26.3 brings AirPods-like pairing to third-party devices in EU under DMA
#166Re: iOS 26.3 brings AirPods-like pairing to third-party devices in EU under DMA
#167Earlier quoted context omitted.
I really don't understand people who defend Apple on this. The only reason I can imagine is that they're shareholders who don't use any Apple products, or shareholders who use exclusively Apple products and can't understand what sort of poor scrub might want an accessory not made by them.
[flagged]