> it’s better at creating spreadsheets
I have a bad feeling about this.
GPT-5.2
161–170 of 1001 posts
Re: GPT-5.2
#162No, thank you, OpenAI and ChatGPT doesn't cut it for me.
Re: GPT-5.2
#163gpt-5.2 and gpt-5.2-chat-latest the same token price? Isn't the latter non-thinking and more akin to -nano or -mini?
Re: GPT-5.2
#164GPT-5.2 System Card PDF: https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/3a4153c8-c748-4b71-8e31-aecbde944...
Thanks, we'll put that in the toptext as well.
Re: GPT-5.2
#165Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can test it by asking it to: change the pitch of its voice, make specific sounds (like laughter), differentiate between words that are spelled the same but pronounced differently (record and record), etc.
Good idea, but an external “bolted on” LLM-based TTS would still pass that in many cases, right?
I tried to make ChatGPT sing Mary had a little lamb recently and it's atonal but vaguely resembles the melody, which is interesting.
Re: GPT-5.2
#166How can I hide the big "Ask ChatGPT" button I accidentally clicked like 3 times while actually trying to read this on my phone? I guess I must "listen" to the article...
With Safari on iOS you can hide distracting items. I just tried it on that button, it works flawlessly.
Re: GPT-5.2
#167Is it me, or did it still get at least three placements of components (RAM and PCIe slots, plus it's DisplayPort and not HDMI) in the motherboard image[0] completely wrong? Why would they use that as a promotional image? 0: https://images.ctfassets.net/kftzwdyauwt9/6lyujQxhZDnOMruN3f...
Yep, the point we wanted to make here is that GPT-5.2's vision is better, not perfect. Cherrypicking a perfect output would actually mislead readers, and that wasn't our intent.
[flagged]
Re: GPT-5.2
#168Still 256K input tokens. So disappointing (predictable, but disappointing).
Re: GPT-5.2
#169Slight increase in model cost, but looks like benefits across the board to match. gpt-5.2 $1.75 $0.175 $14.00 gpt-5.1 $1.25 $0.125 $10.00
In particular, the API pricing for GPT-5.2 Pro has me wondering what on earth the possible market for that model is beyond getting to claim a couple of percent higher benchmark performance in press releases. >Input: >$21.00 / 1M tokens >Output: >$168.00 / 1M tokens That's the most "don't use this" pricing I've seen on a model. https://openai.com/api/pricing/
Pro solves many problems for me on first try that the other 5.1 models are unable to after many iterations. I don't pay API pricing but if I could afford it I would in some cases for the much higher context window it affords when a problem calls for it. I'd rather spend some tens of dollars to solve a problem than grind at it for hours.
Re: GPT-5.2
#170Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yep, the point we wanted to make here is that GPT-5.2's vision is better, not perfect. Cherrypicking a perfect output would actually mislead readers, and that wasn't our intent.
[flagged]
What did Sam Altman say? Or is this more of a vague impression thing?