Live data from Hacker News

US could ask foreign tourists for five-year social media history before entry

bbc.co.uk

161–170 of 304 posts

Re: US could ask foreign tourists for five-year social media history before entry

#161

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Soccer, just the biggest sport on earth. North America will host the FIFA World Cup 2026 with events in the US, Mexico, and Canada. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_FIFA_World_Cup

> Soccer, just the biggest sport on earth. What's "earth"? Is that somewhere south of Texas?

Ah yes, Texas. If Alaska split in two, Texas would be only the third largest state.

Re: US could ask foreign tourists for five-year social media history before entry

#162
post #46
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My social media is full of rants about the ongoing trend of bringing fascism to the US and the authoritarian and repressive tendencies of the current president. Am I not allowed to say that?

You are suppressing free speech of fascists by doing that. Your speech might make them feel bad and free speech is defined by your willingness to defend fascists. As an enemy to free speech, you wont be allowed in.

"I also have a reddit account, but it was banned for inciting violence or harm against Nazis."

Re: US could ask foreign tourists for five-year social media history before entry

#163

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Besides, why would you want to come if you don’t like it here? There's a difference between saying that you disagree with the way that a country is being run, and wanting to be violent or pursue criminal activity against that country or its people. What you're missing is that the former should be legal in any democracy (and is in the UK), and the latter shouldn't be legal anywhere (and isn't in the UK). You're claim…

> You're claiming the UK lacks "freedom of speech" because it doesn't allow people to incite violence online, while saying the USA has free speech, despite it seemingly rejecting visitors for legal political speech. Free speech means the country must tolerate what citizens say; it does not mean the country can't exercise its discretion over its borders to bar entry to foreigners who say things citizens don't like.

That's certainly a stance you can take, but it's not one I'd expect to see from a US administration that's repeatedly (including from the president less than 48 hours ago) got on its high horse to criticise what it perceives as a government crackdown on freedom of speech in European countries.

Re: US could ask foreign tourists for five-year social media history before entry

#164

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> A vast majority of people aren’t happy about what’s going on. What makes you say that? Granted, I'm just an outside observer trying to see what's going on, but since the majority isn't protesting as far as I can tell, it doesn't seem like the majority doesn't care too much currently. Probably most people are in a dire enough situation that they cannot afford to protest, and are busy enough trying to figure out how…

> Probably most people are in a dire enough situation that they cannot afford to protest, and are busy enough trying to figure out how to re-organize their living situation. What is your mental model of the median American citizen?

Boiled down and greatly simplified; someone who struggles to afford food, housing, and child care.

Seems most independent analysts highlight the large swaths of people unable to get basic necessities, just one example of many: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/in-every-corner-of-the-co...

> The nation’s affordability crisis has not spared middle-class families, one-third of which struggle to afford basic necessities such as food, housing, and child care.

> Across the 160 U.S. metro areas studied, at least 20% of middle-class earners cannot afford to live in that place, after adjusting for local income ranges and price variations.

When you don't know how to afford food for the week or pay the next rent, you're hardly interested in going out on the street and protest. Been there and done that, and politics, no matter how aggressive or "against you" it can feel, is really the last thing on your mind in those situations.

Re: US could ask foreign tourists for five-year social media history before entry

#168

[flagged]

Including Republicans in the Young Republican club…

More like most zoomer right-wingers honestly

Its only the oldheads and those with financial stake that are big on israel

Re: US could ask foreign tourists for five-year social media history before entry

#169

[flagged]

You seem to be one of those silly people who conflate antisemitism with disliking how the state of Israel behaves under the leadership of Benjamin Netanyahu. These are not equivalent concepts.

Almost like their comment is satirizing those people...

Re: US could ask foreign tourists for five-year social media history before entry

#170
post #110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, but few other countries are as draconian about this as the US seems to want to be, and it is relevant to want to discuss how it will affect the US to make itself a less attractive place to travel to.

Try travel to Europe on an African passport…

or try to travel to an islamic country with an Israeli stamp on your passport or an Israeli passport.
Post reply on HN