Live data from Hacker News

How much Anthropic and Cursor spend on Amazon Web Services

wheresyoured.at

161–166 of 166 posts

Re: How much Anthropic and Cursor spend on Amazon Web Services

#161

I think this is a minor speed bump and VC’s believe that cost of inference will decrease over time and this is a gold rush to grab market share while cost of inference declines. I don’t think they got it right and the market share and usage grew faster than inference dropped, but inference costs will clearly drop and these companies will eventually be very profitable. Reality is that startups like this assume moore’s…

My own usage and the usage of pretty much everyone I know says that as inference costs drop, usage goes up in lockstep, and I’m still nowhere near the ceiling of how many tokens I could use if they were free. I think if these companies are gambling their future on COGS going down, that’s a gamble they’re going to lose.

aka Jevons Paradox.

we strive to make machines more efficient to reduce energy usage. That makes $ per unit of work lower. But instead of reducing spending, people find more uses for the machines.

Re: How much Anthropic and Cursor spend on Amazon Web Services

#162

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> secretly shorting the stock instead of having reasons to think it's empty hype that's literally the exact opposite of what i'm saying - literally read my responce to comments up chain.

Interesting > i'm starting a new trend: ask every person that is so certain about the negative outlook how big their short position is. so how big is your short position? please let us know. To me people with short positions likely be bending the truth. To you they are honest. Funny There's a reason why investing must be declared in many situations. and it is because they are a conflict of interest not proof of hones…

Do people have literally any idea what they're saying when they write these quippy responses?

> conflict of interest not proof of honesty

What exactly do you think disclosing a conflict of interest is if not honesty...............

Re: How much Anthropic and Cursor spend on Amazon Web Services

#163

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Interesting > i'm starting a new trend: ask every person that is so certain about the negative outlook how big their short position is. so how big is your short position? please let us know. To me people with short positions likely be bending the truth. To you they are honest. Funny There's a reason why investing must be declared in many situations. and it is because they are a conflict of interest not proof of hones…

Do people have literally any idea what they're saying when they write these quippy responses? > conflict of interest not proof of honesty What exactly do you think disclosing a conflict of interest is if not honesty...............

Disclosing conflict of interest is not making you honest, it simply lets people know you have reasons to bend the truth

That's the reason in many cases disclosure is mandatory and not disclosing it is illegal. To let people know to take it with a grain of salt.

True honesty = no conflict of interest. Judging things for what they are not what bucks they can make you if you spin it right

Re: How much Anthropic and Cursor spend on Amazon Web Services

#164

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do people have literally any idea what they're saying when they write these quippy responses? > conflict of interest not proof of honesty What exactly do you think disclosing a conflict of interest is if not honesty...............

Disclosing conflict of interest is not making you honest, it simply lets people know you have reasons to bend the truth That's the reason in many cases disclosure is mandatory and not disclosing it is illegal. To let people know to take it with a grain of salt. True honesty = no conflict of interest. Judging things for what they are not what bucks they can make you if you spin it right

> True honesty = no conflict of interest

Lol bro you're making up the definitions the definition just to suit your weird perspective.

Re: How much Anthropic and Cursor spend on Amazon Web Services

#165
post #155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, it does. You may know what there would be realignment, but you don't know where or how, and may not possess the professional knowledge and resources required to profit from it directly. The known part is general, the unknown part is specific and time-dependent.

Someone else already said: yes all companies go to zero on a timeline that includes the heat death of the universe. Your claim is about as clever as that.

No, that would only work after getting really high. You know, when somebody asks "why this thing is such and such?" and you answer "why things are at all? Maybe it's all just our imagination, dude! Maybe nothing makes sense and we are living in a simulation! Dude, just feel you mind expanding!"

But if we lay off the bong for a bit and think soberly, then no, knowing that certain economic process is not sustainable and will eventually collapse, but not being able to profit from it is not the same as saying every bubble would pop at the heat death of the universe, billions years for now. It's so not the same that the very comparison should be immediately perceived as absurd.

Re: How much Anthropic and Cursor spend on Amazon Web Services

#166

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Disclosing conflict of interest is not making you honest, it simply lets people know you have reasons to bend the truth That's the reason in many cases disclosure is mandatory and not disclosing it is illegal. To let people know to take it with a grain of salt. True honesty = no conflict of interest. Judging things for what they are not what bucks they can make you if you spin it right

> True honesty = no conflict of interest Lol bro you're making up the definitions the definition just to suit your weird perspective.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict_of_interest

> By definition, a "conflict of interest" occurs if, within a particular decision-making context, an individual is subject to two coexisting interests that are in direct conflict with each other ("competing interests"). This is important because under these circumstances, the decision-making process can be disrupted or compromised, affecting the integrity or reliability of the outcomes.

The decision is what to write on HN and integrity is compromised if "writing truth" is in conflict with "get richer" which can happen if you invest in a sus biz.

We can pretend you are the rare exception that speaks the truth even if it means you go broke but even then it just proves the rule

Post reply on HN