Live data from Hacker News

Zed is now available on Windows

zed.dev

161–170 of 386 posts

Re: Zed is now available on Windows

#161
post #159

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do either Windsurf or Cursor work well with local or no AI? One of the things I like about Zed is that it can, and is completely free.

Excuse me, can you read what I wrote? I didn't say zed editor is bad, I just said that zed's PREDICT EDIT isn't good enough, or at least it shouldn't charge for it.

they shouldn't charge for it because their competetors have money to burn?? that is not how business works

Re: Zed is now available on Windows

#162
post #111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was a little sus, so I checked: https://imgur.com/a/AJFQjfL 897MB! But it appears to have installed itself twice for some reason. Maybe one is an 'update' which it didn't clean up...? I'm not sure. Edit: I just opened it and it cleaned itself up. 408MB now. I guess it was in the process of upgrading.

So the upgrades are not delta diffs either?

Even if it’s delta, it cannot patch itself when running on Windows. So it runs the updater, creates a new exec and switches to it after relaunch. Same as Chrome or Firefox.

Re: Zed is now available on Windows

#163
post #137

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Welcome to static linking of large applications. The world moved into dynamic linking in the 1980's for a reason. It is cool to advocate for a return to static linking when it is basic CLI tools.

> The world moved into dynamic linking in the 1980's for a reason. Reasons that no longer exist. Storage is cheap, update distribution is free, time spent debugging various shared lib versions across OSes is expensive.

Big sigh. I wish we still had pride in our field, rather than this race to the bottom mentality.

Re: Zed is now available on Windows

#165
post #137

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Welcome to static linking of large applications. The world moved into dynamic linking in the 1980's for a reason. It is cool to advocate for a return to static linking when it is basic CLI tools.

> The world moved into dynamic linking in the 1980's for a reason. Reasons that no longer exist. Storage is cheap, update distribution is free, time spent debugging various shared lib versions across OSes is expensive.

RAM isn't cheap (it may be for your tasks and wallet depth, but generally it isn't, especially since DDR5). Shared objects also get "deduplicated" in RAM, not just on disk.

Re: Zed is now available on Windows

#166
post #31

Unfortunately, I tried to use zed as my daily driver, but the typescript experience was subpar. While the editor itself was snappy, LSP actions like "jump to declaration" were incredibly slow on our codebase compared to VS Code / Cursor.

Electron compiles NodeJS with v8's pointer compression which leads to an up to 50% decrease in memory usage, and might speed it up too.

Are you saying that VSCode runs tsserver in its own NodeJS process? Or are you saying that VSCode uses the NodeJS it ships to run tsserver in a different process?

Re: Zed is now available on Windows

#167

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm glad there's finally some progress in that direction. If they actually implement subpixel RGB anti-aliasing, it would definitely be worth considering as an alternative. It's been surprising to see so many people praise Zed when its text rendering (of all things) has been in such a state for so long.

Tbh though, is subpixel text rendering really all that important anymore when high resolution monitors are common now and low-dpi is the exception?

You should get outside your major metropolis and highly paid Western job once in a while. High-DPI monitors are the exception for most of the world.

Re: Zed is now available on Windows

#168
post #159

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do either Windsurf or Cursor work well with local or no AI? One of the things I like about Zed is that it can, and is completely free.

Excuse me, can you read what I wrote? I didn't say zed editor is bad, I just said that zed's PREDICT EDIT isn't good enough, or at least it shouldn't charge for it.

I never thought you said Zed was bad. I was genuinely asking since Cursor and Windsurf exclusively advertise AI features, whereas Zed is also a good editor without AI. I never bothered to try them because I inherently distrust AI that I don't control, and find the cloud stuff to be too expensive on top. Just wanted to know if they're any good, or can even be used at all, without AI; since their websites say nothing on the subject.

Re: Zed is now available on Windows

#169

Just wanted to mention that some basic Windows-OS keyboard shortcuts don't work, like ALT+F to open the File menu. Also things like ALT+SPACEBAR to bring up the system context menu for the focussed window (the menu with maximise, minimise, close options etc.) do not seem to work. I'm guessing with the DirectX rendering backend, the 'app' is rendered more akin to a video game than a native win32 process. Also after in…

PSPad is 40MB. And that is quite a legacy software that is still being updated to this day. Notepad++ is 17 mb.

400 mb for new project in this amazing bestest compiled language ever made is ridiculous.

Re: Zed is now available on Windows

#170

I've been using Zed primarily for months but I just switched back to VSCode for 2 reasons, one of which is kinda my fault and the other it's unclear where the fault is. 1. I deleted a few hours of work because I was late night coding and I decided to rename a file before check-in and delete the old version. Well I renamed it and Right-Click -> Deleted the new version by accident. It turns out Zed has both "Delete" an…

> Zed does not implement Ctrl+Z yet

Wait, what? That seems like an incredibly important missing piece of functionality.

Post reply on HN