And this is why I avoid and will always avoid "Secure Boot". I can see many newer Linux people being locked out starting in Sept.
Linux and Secure Boot certificate expiration
161–170 of 272 posts
Re: Linux and Secure Boot certificate expiration
#162This is yet another why I do not encrypt.
Re: Linux and Secure Boot certificate expiration
#163This is yet another why I do not encrypt.
Re: Linux and Secure Boot certificate expiration
#164It's totally crazy that we have to go through Microsoft to sign things to be able to have our OS run on third parties computers, and that Microsoft manage to win about this so easily as it was never seriously challenged.
Re: Linux and Secure Boot certificate expiration
#165I wonder what my laptop will do soon. Lenovo, in their infinite wisdom, has decided to load an Nvidia blob signed by Microsoft before even being able to access the UEFI firmware interface. People who have tried to install their own secure boot keys found out the hard way that you can't even get into the firmware configuration interface to undo the change. Their official workaround is to only load secure boot keys thr…
For your current laptop, you might be able to use the `--tpm-eventlog` to `sbctl enroll-keys` to enroll hashes of your OptionROM to whitelist that blob.
Re: Linux and Secure Boot certificate expiration
#166And this is why I avoid and will always avoid "Secure Boot". I can see many newer Linux people being locked out starting in Sept.
Or you could just remove microsoft's keys from your systems and sign your bootloader with your own key. That's what I do on all of my systems so I am unimpacted by this.
Re: Linux and Secure Boot certificate expiration
#167Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or you could just remove microsoft's keys from your systems and sign your bootloader with your own key. That's what I do on all of my systems so I am unimpacted by this.
do you have any source on how to do that?
Re: Linux and Secure Boot certificate expiration
#168Re: Linux and Secure Boot certificate expiration
#169It's totally crazy that we have to go through Microsoft to sign things to be able to have our OS run on third parties computers, and that Microsoft manage to win about this so easily as it was never seriously challenged.
Only legal requirements can change it. Nowadays, the mokutil is good enough that linux users can build a good tool around it to automate registration at boot that should ease some pain. But otherwise, it is a big mess and still needs legal requirement.
[1] https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/grapheneos-is-taking-act...
Re: Linux and Secure Boot certificate expiration
#170Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or you could just remove microsoft's keys from your systems and sign your bootloader with your own key. That's what I do on all of my systems so I am unimpacted by this.
do you have any source on how to do that?
Note sbctl is one of the easier tools to do this.