Earlier quoted context omitted.
What's a good motorcycle for typesetting? Any recommendations?
Adobe InDesign.
Quarkdown: A modern Markdown-based typesetting system
161–170 of 285 posts
Re: Quarkdown: A modern Markdown-based typesetting system
#162Earlier quoted context omitted.
If one just chooses a reasonable documentclass and if need be a few packages suited to the requirements of one's document, then it all "just works" with (mostly) sensible defaults and minimal configuration. Memoir hugely simplified my own work in LaTeX back when I was doing book composition. Or, just use LyX....
Well, you'll have to install and keep those packages somewhere on your system. And maybe a few months from now after your latex distribution got updated by the system your document suddenly no longer compiles. What I want is something like npm-like package management for this, where the packages are just kept there next to the document. I don't care if I'll have a package 20 times on my system either, storage hasn't…
I'm using LaTeX 2e for 25+ years. This has literally never happened to me. If that's not stability, I don't know what is. LaTeX documents I wrote in my grad days still compile for me. I just checked and it does. I do keep the dependency packages myself in my folder.
Has this issue ever happened to anyone? Why would LaTeX distribution getting updated break my documents? It's still the same latex compiler and the same base styles and packages!
Re: Quarkdown: A modern Markdown-based typesetting system
#163I wonder how much control this gives you. For example, drop-caps, kerning, text flow around images, etc.
https://github.com/iamgio/quarkdown/blob/main/mock/textforma... https://github.com/iamgio/quarkdown/blob/main/mock/images.qm...
Re: Quarkdown: A modern Markdown-based typesetting system
#164Earlier quoted context omitted.
If one just chooses a reasonable documentclass and if need be a few packages suited to the requirements of one's document, then it all "just works" with (mostly) sensible defaults and minimal configuration. Memoir hugely simplified my own work in LaTeX back when I was doing book composition. Or, just use LyX....
Well, you'll have to install and keep those packages somewhere on your system. And maybe a few months from now after your latex distribution got updated by the system your document suddenly no longer compiles. What I want is something like npm-like package management for this, where the packages are just kept there next to the document. I don't care if I'll have a package 20 times on my system either, storage hasn't…
Re: Quarkdown: A modern Markdown-based typesetting system
#165Markdown, Quardown, Typst, this and that. This looks to LaTeX. All of this became so confusing and un-standardized - I went back to HTML+CSS.
You know what, while you're at it, I might as well bring it up. How about XML? I haven't really tried writing large pieces of text in it but I am already seriously considering. All other alternatives are too complicated and have a learning curve that gets in the way of writing itself. With XML, I'd be able to define my own tags and run them by a parser later on to auto-generate indexable footnotes, and create my own…
This seems extensible to the degree that I want (i.e. semantically rich enough that you can conceivably hang any application from it). But I just can't bring myself to write in XML syntax, especially for maths.
Re: Quarkdown: A modern Markdown-based typesetting system
#166Markdown, Quardown, Typst, this and that. This looks to LaTeX. All of this became so confusing and un-standardized - I went back to HTML+CSS.
If 2005 text editors autocomplete made it easy to balance and indent html/xml tags and syntax highlighting like today, would JSON, Yaml, Markdown have taken off? In The Art of Unix Programming from 2003, the author states editing xml by hand is torture, hence we must invent unique text formats and parsers for the same.
Re: Quarkdown: A modern Markdown-based typesetting system
#167Earlier quoted context omitted.
That assumes that the only issue with LaTeX is its syntax. Other issues I can think of are that LaTeX doesn't generate HTML and that LaTeX is completely Unicode-disabled.
Your statement is not correct, LuaLaTeX can output any unicode character you need and also you can use Lua as well for scripting.
Re: Quarkdown: A modern Markdown-based typesetting system
#168Earlier quoted context omitted.
its for people who want latex but are mad that latex became c++
LaTeX also has some bizarre defaults like bitmap fonts in a tool designed to allow people to create high quality typeset documents.
Re: Quarkdown: A modern Markdown-based typesetting system
#169Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, you'll have to install and keep those packages somewhere on your system. And maybe a few months from now after your latex distribution got updated by the system your document suddenly no longer compiles. What I want is something like npm-like package management for this, where the packages are just kept there next to the document. I don't care if I'll have a package 20 times on my system either, storage hasn't…
> And maybe a few months from now after your latex distribution got updated by the system your document suddenly no longer compiles. I'm using LaTeX 2e for 25+ years. This has literally never happened to me. If that's not stability, I don't know what is. LaTeX documents I wrote in my grad days still compile for me. I just checked and it does. I do keep the dependency packages myself in my folder. Has this issue ever…
Re: Quarkdown: A modern Markdown-based typesetting system
#170Is the comparison table accurate? - https://github.com/iamgio/quarkdown#comparison Surely LaTeX has full scripting ability even though I wouldn't wish such a punishment on anyone. Surely Quarkdown's gibberish like syntax is not more concise and more readable than Typst? And surely the learning curve is not easier than Typst? I'd say the learning curve is more or less the same as Typst. Surely LaTeX can also produce H…
To be fair, (most) markdown is valid Quarkdown. Barrier to entry really doesnt get any lower than that. Of course the learning curve is not fully synonymous with the barrier to entry, but it's a significant part.
And "learning curve" is really such a subjective quality. Kinda fucked from the start once you put it in a comparison table. Explicit features are more objective but even then sometimes products dont NEED certain features because of their design.