Live data from Hacker News

DOJ: Google must sell Chrome, Android could be next

arstechnica.com

161–164 of 164 posts

Re: DOJ: Google must sell Chrome, Android could be next

#161
post #139

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm a happy Firefox user on desktop and Android. Can you be more specific?

It is terribly insecure and much easier to exploit than Chrome.

In the narrow case of zero day vulnerabilities perhaps, but a good ad blocker is part of any reasonable security posture and is key to avoiding exploitation in practice.

Re: DOJ: Google must sell Chrome, Android could be next

#162
post #139

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm a happy Firefox user on desktop and Android. Can you be more specific?

It is terribly insecure and much easier to exploit than Chrome.

What makes you say that? Like Chrome it supports site isolation and sandboxing. Can you be more specific?

Re: DOJ: Google must sell Chrome, Android could be next

#164

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>The problem is that's basically not a thing for digital goods because dumping is selling below the marginal cost and the marginal cost for digital goods is zero. Gmail is free, Docs is free, Maps is free, lots of google apps are free. This makes it very difficult few a new player to enter the market. This is predatory pricing. Nothing else you said is really relevant to the forced sale of Chrome.

> Gmail is free, Docs is free, Maps is free, lots of google apps are free. This makes it very difficult few a new player to enter the market. This is predatory pricing. It isn't. Things with ~0 marginal cost end up being free or free-with-ads. Webmail was free before Gmail, OpenOffice was free before Google Docs, MapQuest was free before Google Maps, because that's the market price for those things. > Nothing else yo…

OpenOffice isn't a product
Post reply on HN