Live data from Hacker News

Fair Pricing

kagi.com

161–170 of 512 posts

Re: Fair Pricing

#161
post #111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If the streaming services did this, I would probably have a lot more of them.

Similarly, for paywalled news/journals.

Fifteen years ago people were talking about micropayments per article for news services being just around the corner. What ever happened to that?

Re: Fair Pricing

#163
post #138

I will sign back up for a paid service when funding Russian search engine Yandex is dropped. Many like to forget there is a war.

That's definitely an interesting hill to die on. I can say as a paid Kagi user and regular donator to ВСУ

Re: Fair Pricing

#164

Only paying customers seem happy about Kagi. I have a strange feeling that a lot of paying customers think Kagi search is "better" just because their brain wants to justify them paying for search. Is there a psychological term for such a syndrome?

I think you're talking about Choice-supportive bias.

I don't know why you're throwing this out here without anything to support it.

Re: Fair Pricing

#165
post #98

Subscribed! I have a severe subscription fatigue, so I was avoiding Kagi. But with this change, it makes it much less problematic. That reminds me, I need to cancel my 24 Hour Fitness subscription.

When most of services nowadays seem like a hostile subscription, this brings joy.

edit: use of Yandex on the other hand.. yeah that's a no go for paid subscription.

Re: Fair Pricing

#166
post #75

This makes sense, if someone isn't using your service for a month, chances are good that they are going to cancel soon. Maybe they'll keep on paying for another few months, but if they're not using it, they're not getting any value from it. So rather than getting them to cancel, pause their subscription. You don't have to deal with cancellations, and if/when the user does return, you are one step further than you wou…

You are really underestimating how many users just forget they have such unused subscriptions, and how much of subscription based company monthly revenue is those that are not used at all.

Re: Fair Pricing

#167
post #120
post #75

This makes sense, if someone isn't using your service for a month, chances are good that they are going to cancel soon. Maybe they'll keep on paying for another few months, but if they're not using it, they're not getting any value from it. So rather than getting them to cancel, pause their subscription. You don't have to deal with cancellations, and if/when the user does return, you are one step further than you wou…

I dunno. The thing is, Kagi isn’t really that much better than Google. When they still had a free tier, I tried it every once in a while, and it quickly wastes a lot of searches even while just entering queries, and then the chance to find something better than Google is mediocre. Perhaps a prepaid model might make more sense, especially if it’s designed not to blow through queries quickly and transparent about how m…

I found it way better simply because you can blacklist garbage SEO'd sites.

Re: Fair Pricing

#168
post #138

I will sign back up for a paid service when funding Russian search engine Yandex is dropped. Many like to forget there is a war.

Exactly. I've used the free tier a bit. I'd say it's never worse than Google, and sometimes significantly better. I'll happily pay a bit for this. But no way am I paying a single cent for anything where a significant part of what makes it work is Russian.

Glory and liberty for Ukraine!

Re: Fair Pricing

#169

Only paying customers seem happy about Kagi. I have a strange feeling that a lot of paying customers think Kagi search is "better" just because their brain wants to justify them paying for search. Is there a psychological term for such a syndrome?

> Only paying customers seem happy about Kagi.

It is paid service, what is the other option? People that don't use the service being happy with it?

> because their brain wants to justify them paying for search

It is search engine, not candy crush. No one wants to pay for searching, if they do it is because they find it useful. It is not their brain gets a shot of dopamine every time they do a search on it.

Re: Fair Pricing

#170

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Similarly, for paywalled news/journals.

Fifteen years ago people were talking about micropayments per article for news services being just around the corner. What ever happened to that?

AFAIK it never pans out really. People turn out very stingy if they're faced with a decision to pay or not to pay for every article, so the revenues end up a lot lower than what the subscription model would pay.
Post reply on HN