Live data from Hacker News

Agents Are Not Enough

arxiv.org

161–165 of 165 posts

Re: Agents Are Not Enough

#161

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, this is the correct answer. This is the answer I'd be looking for if I was asking that question. That you failed to specify the question is a failure on your part. Even stupid models understand that if I ask them the population of Denmark they only need to give rough approximation.

no, i expect the system to answer the question I asked. Not the question it thinks I wanted to ask. The question is not underspecified, because the point of it is to demonstrate how the llm will never tell you it doesn't know. Nor will it ever tell you your prompt is underspecified.

> The question is not underspecified, because the point of it is to demonstrate how the llm will never tell you it doesn't know

I don't see how "is not underspecified" follows from the point you were trying to demonstrate. Yes, you wanted it to be well specified, because otherwise the point doesn't work. But you actually failed to generate such a question cause both people and AI interpret it differently.

Re: Agents Are Not Enough

#162

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It only gives you the statistically more likely way a conversation would evolve after one party says "Write a hello world in Python." It only happens to be the correct one. If I ask a 5yo "42 * 21 equals...?" and the kid replies with a random number, say, "882", and gets it right, it does not mean that the kid knows what multiplication is or how it works.

ChatGPT can use a stateful python environment to do math. It isn’t confabulating the answers, it’s using a calculator.

Small clarification: The LLM is still confabulating the short python expression string.

The execution of that expression is being carried out by a fundamentally separate set of algorithms, which do not have the same strengths or weaknesses.

Re: Agents Are Not Enough

#163
post #149

Earlier quoted context omitted.

GI is in our heads. The A is artificial which means built by humans. They are asking the same question you are.

> GI is in our heads. The A is artificial which means built by humans. Humans aren’t built by humans? Where do humans come from, then? They say the kids aren’t having sex anymore, but I didn’t realize it was because they aren’t aware of the function.

They're begat, not built. We have no means to create humans in a lab the way we create robots.

Re: Agents Are Not Enough

#164

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is publishing for the sake of publishing.

The general negativity toward agents makes it read like the problem section of a research proposal ("X isn't good enough, we're going to develop solution Y").

That’s exactly what I thought.

Re: Agents Are Not Enough

#165
post #163
post #149

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> GI is in our heads. The A is artificial which means built by humans. Humans aren’t built by humans? Where do humans come from, then? They say the kids aren’t having sex anymore, but I didn’t realize it was because they aren’t aware of the function.

They're begat, not built. We have no means to create humans in a lab the way we create robots.

Sex can be had in the lab just fine, at least where the social situation allows.
Post reply on HN