Live data from Hacker News

Open Source on its own is no alternative to Big Tech

berthub.eu

161–170 of 199 posts

Re: Open Source on its own is no alternative to Big Tech

#161

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Insurance. The piece of paper that states who the buck stops with when there's a claim or lawsuit.

I disbelieve that starting a lawsuit against Oracle because their software didn't work as it was supposed to would ever end well. Do you know of any examples of that happening?

Crowdstrike.

Re: Open Source on its own is no alternative to Big Tech

#163
post #21
post #9

EU is a digital colony and that's entirely down to the lack of political will.

I don’t think it’s a digital will. I think it’s an advisory layer which is completely incompetent and will always try to lead decisions toward proprietary software solutions because they “job hop” between the public and private sectors. I do not mean this as corruption or shady, but simply that they have powerful roles because they have a lot of private sector jobs behind them. Business leaders who employ thousands o…

Yes it is about a lack of political will. US companies have been illegal in the EU for a decade now (Schrems II), but the enforcement of this is hardly anywhere to be seen.

It's the same kind of political denial as with being "concerned" about climate change, but still trading with China (even worse when this allows for fake self-congratulations about decreasing greenhouse gas emissions, when it mostly comes from most of the industry having been exported).

Re: Open Source on its own is no alternative to Big Tech

#164
post #151
post #127

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is still enough Unix™ around, including from a well know fruit company.

No, macOS is FreeBSD, not the Unix from Bell Labs.

macOS is many things, a bit of NeXTSTEP, a pinch of Mach, q.b. BSD, and a UNIX™ certification from OpenGroup.

Re: Open Source on its own is no alternative to Big Tech

#165
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> They sell me by convincing me that everything just works, and when it doesn't they'll be there to fix it. and they'd tell you to pay up 10x, or lose this stability in the future; If it was an open source software, you will have the option to go to a competing vendor.

Is there a single example of multiple vendors selling support for the same open-source piece of software, where I can just hire a different vendor if I no longer like my current one, without changing anything major in my operations? You could say that Canonical and IBM RedHat compete on offering Linux support, but the reality is that it's not that much harder to switch from RHEL to Ubuntu than switching to any other…

Wordpress

Re: Open Source on its own is no alternative to Big Tech

#166

I think the key point is this; >> (By the way, all new software without accompanying support & guidance is doomed to fail. And if that software comes from a dominant player, you’ll just have to deal with that by the way.) There's a temptation to conflate the software license with the software business. This is natural, but places software as the primary value in the chain. From a business perspective the software tho…

License does matter. Without OSS, computing as we know it doesn't exist. A better analogy would be if roads and utility cables were built as open source, everyone used them for free, then they were acquired by giant companies who charge for their use.

> "Without OSS, computing as we know it doesn't exist."

The rise of the Internet and the dot-com boom happened largely without OSS, on proprietary UNIXes, proprietary web server engines, and proprietary database engines.

FAANG and other high tech businesses can easily afford very expensive servers and datacenters to house them thanks to the very very fat profit margins. They can also easily afford the cost of an OS license and other software tools.

Re: Open Source on its own is no alternative to Big Tech

#167
post #158
post #146

[flagged]

How about the first result for "museum cataloging software" in DuckDuckGo, CollectiveAccess? This was without adding an "open source" qualifier. It seems to be in use in the industry too. https://www.collectiveaccess.org/ https://www.dublincore.org/groups/tools/dc2008/dc2008_seth_k... Another one apparently in use in the UK is CollectionSpace: https://collectionstrust.org.uk/software/collectionspace/ http://www.colle…

Yes, there are plenty of them. That is not the point I was making.

Re: Open Source on its own is no alternative to Big Tech

#168
post #55

I think the author is not learned in the technology economics. IBM to save it's business had to merge with Red hat almost 50% 50% in 2018. Microsoft it's security and cloud offering had to, open source it's .net framework, aquire GitHub, ditch Visual Studio fot Visual Studio Code, ARM is eating the world, it over hauled the x86_x64 architecture, and became the Defacto architecture. We can go on and on and on and on,t…

Nice explanation, except IBM has been one of the largest Linux contributors since forever, they saw it as a means to reduce Aix development costs. Linux only took off during the dotcom days as IBM, Oracle and Compaq started adopting it into commercial workloads, back in 2000. Visual Studio Code isn't in the same ballpark as Visual Studio. It was already an Azure project, as the Monaco editor, and it was a way to kill…

AWS Graviton servers are ARM. These tend to be cheaper and more reliable than Intel/AMD counterparts.

Re: Open Source on its own is no alternative to Big Tech

#169

A sales position I was working in 2017 was the first time I'd used Windows 10. I had a very urgent issue with a customer who needed our small business to confirm a change they were requesting. I needed to go through the technical details of the customer's request by reviewing their documents over the phone on my computer. As I was on the phone and going through their documents, Windows 10 decided to install updates.…

If you did have a proper IT department, they would have forced you to keep your computer up to date with security and other patches anyway. All that posts like this do is document people's irresponsibility in keeping their business-owned computer secured.

Re: Open Source on its own is no alternative to Big Tech

#170

Earlier quoted context omitted.

License does matter. Without OSS, computing as we know it doesn't exist. A better analogy would be if roads and utility cables were built as open source, everyone used them for free, then they were acquired by giant companies who charge for their use.

> " Without OSS, computing as we know it doesn't exist. " The rise of the Internet and the dot-com boom happened largely without OSS, on proprietary UNIXes, proprietary web server engines, and proprietary database engines. FAANG and other high tech businesses can easily afford very expensive servers and datacenters to house them thanks to the very very fat profit margins. They can also easily afford the cost of an OS…

This is nonsense. Consumer workstations were proprietary. The internet was made by government grants and us.
Post reply on HN