Live data from Hacker News

UK will give sovereignty of Chagos Islands to Mauritius

bbc.co.uk

161–170 of 296 posts

Re: UK will give sovereignty of Chagos Islands to Mauritius

#161
post #94
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are multiple islands and archipelagos in the region. Close to Africa/ME: Maldives, Seychelles, Comoros, Mayotte Close to SE Asia: Cocos and Christmas Island Diego Garcia just happened to be forcibly depopulated by the British, so was a convenient choice.

I mean, what current option is equivalent to Diego Garcia? Are any of those options realistic right now?

They're all pretty far from land and in the same general area.

If Diego Garcia were no longer an option, there would be alternatives. Especially with US levels of lease money.

That said, few of them are quite as remote as Diego Garcia. Which means not quite as easy to secretly fly RQ-180s or whatever the hell is more clandestinely based there.

Re: UK will give sovereignty of Chagos Islands to Mauritius

#162

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't get the reason for skepticism, when this is coming from scientists who've been studying the field for many years, and have been making predictions that have been coming true. It's like an avalanche. After it starts you can't stop it or get all that snow back on the mountain; it has to get to level ground, melt (if it gets warm enough) and go through an entire cycle that takes time. So yes, things will likely…

Well, look at this section: > Climate tipping points — the "points of no return" past which key components of Earth's climate will begin to irreversibly break down — could be triggered by much lower temperatures than scientists previously thought, with some tipping points potentially already reached. There are also many more potential tipping points than scientists previously identified, according to a new study. I c…

[flagged]

Re: UK will give sovereignty of Chagos Islands to Mauritius

#163
post #101

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Probably not. In 1997 they were happy to court the $$ associated with opening up this huge new market of 1b+ "middle class" consumers. Id argue they still aren't sufficiently butthurt about it. The UK has sufficient grounds to reclaim HK since china has very much failed to uphold its agreement to keep hong kong democratic for at least 50 years. I guess that's why the CPC goes on gaslighting rants about "whole process…

In what universe does the UK have grounds to have anything to do with governing a region 6000 miles away from home that it seized during the Opium War? I would love for China to have democracy, but Great Britain really doesn't have any moral high ground on the issue nor any business having anything to do with the government there. If you think they aren't sufficiently butthurt about it, I'd counter that by saying "wh…

Shouldn't people of Hong Kong decide that?

https://theworld.org/stories/2016/08/30/there-s-movement-tur...

Re: UK will give sovereignty of Chagos Islands to Mauritius

#164
post #161
post #94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I mean, what current option is equivalent to Diego Garcia? Are any of those options realistic right now?

They're all pretty far from land and in the same general area. If Diego Garcia were no longer an option, there would be alternatives. Especially with US levels of lease money. That said, few of them are quite as remote as Diego Garcia. Which means not quite as easy to secretly fly RQ-180s or whatever the hell is more clandestinely based there.

I don't think geography is the challenge as much as politics. What country and populace will give up their ancestral land to a foreign military base. Would you?

Remember that the small islands don't have much land to begin with, and bases are large.

Re: UK will give sovereignty of Chagos Islands to Mauritius

#165

I imagine whoever got the 99 year lease is feeling pretty pleased about it - that's basically forever as far as they can tell. On the other hand, I bet the UK in 1997 would have hoped for a longer lease on Hong Kong.

Hong Kong island was ceded to the British in perpetuity. The 99 years lease of the New Territories (not Hong Kong, technically) was an additional unequal treaty that the Qing were forced into on top of it, after they also had to give up Kowloon. The British could have asked for 150 years too, who'd have stopped them? Now the same happens to Britain in reverse. There is no benefit for any state to give up territory fo…

[deleted]

Re: UK will give sovereignty of Chagos Islands to Mauritius

#166

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hong Kong island was ceded to the British in perpetuity. The 99 years lease of the New Territories (not Hong Kong, technically) was an additional unequal treaty that the Qing were forced into on top of it, after they also had to give up Kowloon. The British could have asked for 150 years too, who'd have stopped them? Now the same happens to Britain in reverse. There is no benefit for any state to give up territory fo…

> It almost feels like China is involved in this because the number doesn't sound like something Mauritius would come up with on their own. See other 99 year leases the CCP is involved in, they're obsessed with this number Err 99 leases are common in lots of places. 99 years is a bit more than a lifetime so not many people care much about what happens afterwards. And it is a lot shorter than in perpetuity which would…

The forced dispossession of the islanders of their home was a crime against humanity by the UK in the first place. This is righting an abysmal wrong

Re: UK will give sovereignty of Chagos Islands to Mauritius

#167
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Which is owned by a hedge fund, and thankfully not part of this deal (so it's not at risk!)

What are some new countries we can create so we end up with a cool TLD? There’s gotta be someone willing to fund this.

.js would be quite a popular one.

Re: UK will give sovereignty of Chagos Islands to Mauritius

#168

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hong Kong island was ceded to the British in perpetuity. The 99 years lease of the New Territories (not Hong Kong, technically) was an additional unequal treaty that the Qing were forced into on top of it, after they also had to give up Kowloon. The British could have asked for 150 years too, who'd have stopped them? Now the same happens to Britain in reverse. There is no benefit for any state to give up territory fo…

> It almost feels like China is involved in this because the number doesn't sound like something Mauritius would come up with on their own. See other 99 year leases the CCP is involved in, they're obsessed with this number Err 99 leases are common in lots of places. 99 years is a bit more than a lifetime so not many people care much about what happens afterwards. And it is a lot shorter than in perpetuity which would…

> In England during the sixteenth century it was common practice to make leases for a term of three lives or a period of 99 years. It is presumed to be upon the theory that the lease should last thru three generations as it has been common practice to accept thirty-three years as the span of a single generation.

https://archive.org/details/longtermlandlea00mcmigoog/page/n...

Re: UK will give sovereignty of Chagos Islands to Mauritius

#169
post #101

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Probably not. In 1997 they were happy to court the $$ associated with opening up this huge new market of 1b+ "middle class" consumers. Id argue they still aren't sufficiently butthurt about it. The UK has sufficient grounds to reclaim HK since china has very much failed to uphold its agreement to keep hong kong democratic for at least 50 years. I guess that's why the CPC goes on gaslighting rants about "whole process…

In what universe does the UK have grounds to have anything to do with governing a region 6000 miles away from home that it seized during the Opium War? I would love for China to have democracy, but Great Britain really doesn't have any moral high ground on the issue nor any business having anything to do with the government there. If you think they aren't sufficiently butthurt about it, I'd counter that by saying "wh…

> In what universe does the UK have grounds to have anything to do with governing a region 6000 miles away from home that it seized during the Opium War?

A universe that respects the right of the people who live somewhere to chose the government they want? We've all seen the protestors waving British flags there.

Abolishing the right of conquest in the early 20th century was one of the great achievements of humanity, and that is not diminished by the impossibility of making it retroactive.

> If you think they aren't sufficiently butthurt about it, I'd counter that by saying "what can they realistically do about it?" The answer is "absolutely nothing." You want them to invade or something?

> They can write a nastygram or something but any of the promises involved with the transfer really mean nothing.

There's a whole spectrum of diplomatic measures the UK could do short of all-out war. Trade restrictions. Hell, full diplomatic recognition of Taiwan is a great option.

Re: UK will give sovereignty of Chagos Islands to Mauritius

#170
post #164
post #161

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They're all pretty far from land and in the same general area. If Diego Garcia were no longer an option, there would be alternatives. Especially with US levels of lease money. That said, few of them are quite as remote as Diego Garcia. Which means not quite as easy to secretly fly RQ-180s or whatever the hell is more clandestinely based there.

I don't think geography is the challenge as much as politics. What country and populace will give up their ancestral land to a foreign military base. Would you? Remember that the small islands don't have much land to begin with, and bases are large.

A country that's desperate for infrastructure investment and foreign reserves, because they don't have much usable land to start with?

At some point leasing away an island, so that everyone else can have a better quality of life, is an attractive tradeoff.

Post reply on HN