Live data from Hacker News

Who is Marcellus Williams: Execution in Missouri despite evidence of innocence

innocenceproject.org

161–170 of 514 posts

Re: Who is Marcellus Williams: Execution in Missouri despite evidence of innocence

#161
Update: it's too late...

> Marcellus Williams, whose murder conviction was questioned by a prosecutor, died by lethal injection Tuesday evening in Missouri after the US Supreme Court denied a stay.

> The 55-year-old was put to death around 6 p.m. CT at the state prison in Bonne Terre.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/24/us/marcellus-williams-schedul...

Re: Who is Marcellus Williams: Execution in Missouri despite evidence of innocence

#162

Still not sure with so many of the (esp right leaning) in the US claiming to be christian, can also accept this as a punishment. But I get nonsense begets more nonsense.

[flagged]

Because their prophet was murdered by the state. It seems weird that a religion would be pro-execution when their founding was, in part, "innocent man was executed".

I'm sure believers have jumped through the hoops required to justify it but from the outside, one would expect a country that is majority christian to oppose executions.

Re: Who is Marcellus Williams: Execution in Missouri despite evidence of innocence

#163

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's plenty of evidence. He confessed to his girlfriend, and a cellmate. He pawned the victim's possessions. He was seen disposing of bloody clothes. He already had 15 felony convictions in addition to offenses related to Ms. Gayle's murder: robbery (2), armed criminal action (2), assault (2), burglary (4), stealing (3), stealing a motor vehicle, and unlawful use of a weapon. Now, as to whether this evidence is so…

> There's plenty of evidence. He confessed to his girlfriend, and a cellmate. Be careful, this is hearsay and not evidence. Those people claim that he confessed to them, but there is a lot more context. Here is what the linked story says about the "he confessed" part: > The investigation had gone cold until a jail inmate named Henry Cole, a man with a lengthy record, claimed that Mr. Williams confessed to him that he…

>Be careful, this is hearsay and not evidence.

I think you are out of your element. To my understanding hearsay refers to a claim made by someone not in court. In this case the girlfriend and jailmate were called as witnesses and gave testimony in court.

Witnesses are evidence and they are one of the oldest forms of evidence, your view that evidence is only material is a gross misunderstanding of trial procedures.

Re: Who is Marcellus Williams: Execution in Missouri despite evidence of innocence

#164
post #112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Being Christian is about forgiving and loving your neighbours, isn’t it?

I dont think so really. The Crusades would have never happened if that were true.

The Crusades were a valid strategic response to the rise of Islam and the Islamic conquest of Byzantium and the Christian middle east.

Re: Who is Marcellus Williams: Execution in Missouri despite evidence of innocence

#165
post #85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I believe there are heinous crimes that do. Both fitting the crime and as a deterrent.

The US has more violent crime than other Western countries, so as a deterrent, it does not work. Perhaps instead of wasting money on death penalty appeals and killing innocent people, we should think about how we as a country can overhaul the prison system and our societal structures.

For profit prisons are not helping anything. They have zero interest in rehab and reformation - and unfortunately a lot of people in the states and beyond believe once you're a criminal you're tarnished forever.

Re: Who is Marcellus Williams: Execution in Missouri despite evidence of innocence

#166
post #146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not hearsay to go to the witness stand and say the defendant told you something. That defendant is there in court and is able to defend themselves.

That's literally the definition of hearsay. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hearsay

from the article :)

> if Susan is unavailable for cross-examination, the answer is hearsay

Re: Who is Marcellus Williams: Execution in Missouri despite evidence of innocence

#167
post #86

So it seems that the original case rested on the following: - Williams GF witness testimony, that Williams confessed to her. - Jailhouse witness testimony, that Williams had confessed to them. - That Williams had items (purse, laptop, etc.) in his car, on the day or day after the murder. But no DNA evidence? A death penalty seems pretty egregious, when you have that kind of evidence. Seems like there's plenty of reas…

That seems like pretty strong evidence to me!

It seems strong enough to keep someone in jail, potentially forever.

Executing him requires there's absolutely no room for a reversal, and from that point of view the evidence isn't that strong.

Re: Who is Marcellus Williams: Execution in Missouri despite evidence of innocence

#168
post #6

Marcellus Williams was executed yesterday, Tuesday. https://apnews.com/article/missouri-execution-marcellus-will...

don't you mean murdered?

The governor's statement: https://governor.mo.gov/press-releases/archive/state-carry-o...

Re: Who is Marcellus Williams: Execution in Missouri despite evidence of innocence

#169
post #34
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Suppose we lived in a world where it was possible to know someone's guilt or innocence with strictly 100% confidence. Curious to know if your views would change? Note the cost of incarceration is around ~$70k/year; enough to save lives, house people, heal people, feed people etc if put to other uses.

If murder is illegal, then it makes no difference if the state does it as punishment for committing murder. You’ve still sanctioned a murder, admittedly of a murderer. A civilised country accepts this simple logic and doesn’t sanction murder under any circumstances.

By this logic, holding someone against their will is illegal too. When a state does it, we call it incarceration. Is it wrong for the state to sanction incarcerating someone?

Re: Who is Marcellus Williams: Execution in Missouri despite evidence of innocence

#170
post #22

There was another execution in South Carolina on Friday despite new evidence of innocence https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/sep/20/south-caroli...

That case is even worse as it rested fully on the testimony of the other robber, which he made to get a lesser sentence and later rescinded:

> Prosecutors had no forensic evidence connecting Allah to the shooting. Surveillance footage at the store showed two masked men with guns, but they were not identifiable. The state’s case rested on testimony from Allah’s friend and co-defendant, Steven Golden, who was also charged in the robbery and murder. As their joint trial was beginning, Golden pleaded guilty to murder, armed robbery and criminal conspiracy and agreed to testify against Allah. Golden, who was 18 at the time of the robbery, said Allah shot Graves.

Post reply on HN