Earlier quoted context omitted.
But LinkedIn wasn't like that 10 years ago. It was what it was meant to be. To me it feels like TikTok culture infesting all types of social media. At this point LI is beyond saving but a serious competitor would have to be heavily moderated to stay clean which we all know won't happen.
I absolutely cannot understand this perspective. I open LinkedIn to add somebody to my network, contact somebody, or look for a job/hire somebody, and for those things it’s really good. I don’t make any LinkedIn content, I don’t consume any of it, I don't struggle to ignore it entirely, and I don’t miss out on anything by doing so. Where exactly does it need to improve?
LinkedIn blocked due Meshtastic video in private chat
161–170 of 229 posts
Re: LinkedIn blocked due Meshtastic video in private chat
#162We absolutely need a better platform for professional networking. A platform that's not filled with people who dislocate their shoulders trying to pat themselves on the back for some "inspirational" social media babble about the last time they managed to send an email.
I unfollow everyone I'm connected with just so I don't have to see any of it when I have the misfortune of having to log in.
Re: LinkedIn blocked due Meshtastic video in private chat
#163Earlier quoted context omitted.
God it really is heinous. However, I don't think it's a consequence of the platform, but of work culture. People are like that because it works , and it works because we're deep, deep into a headlong rush toward annihilation in the name of profit. The people profiting from destroying every public good - peace, pollution-free air and water and soil, housing, healthcare, etc etc - own basically everything. Our politici…
> deep into a headlong rush toward annihilation in the name of profit. Poverty, illness and starvation are the default state of mankind and the fact that almost nobody lives in deep poverty any more is because people get up in the morning and work hard to produce value.
A most wretched lie. Systems of entrenched inequality and widespread poverty mostly emerged after agriculture and centralized state systems, not during early human history.
That lie serves to shift the blame for people's struggles away from oligarchs and owners and onto their victims. Do you own a company perchance? ... What do your down-stream labourers earn per hour, compared to you?
... Do you think billionaire CEOs and trust-fund nepo babies work harder than people in sweat shops? In mines? Nurses?
Poverty, illness, and starvation are not inherent states. They are outcomes of structural and economic choices.
> the fact that almost nobody lives in deep poverty any more is because people get up in the morning and work hard to produce value.
Another lie, long debunked, labelled "The Protestant Work Ethic Myth". It can be disproved with Nobel economist research [0], World Bank reports [1], or a simple graph [2], not to mention the first few pages of 'Capital'.
Historical evidence and economic research overwhelmingly show that poverty, illness, and starvation are due to structural forces and political choices, and that poverty reduction comes from systemic changes far more than from individual work ethic.
To say otherwise is to blame the victims of terrible crimes of exploitation, while absolving the perpetrators, despite mountains of evidence.
It's fine and good to work, yes. But we have green power, machines, 120 IQ AI, instant global communication... A world where everyone works 20 hours a week with no reduction in Quality of Life for 99% of us is entirely possible, right now; but the current owners of the world would rather see us all burn than move toward it.
0 - https://www.supersummary.com/the-great-escape/summary/
1 - https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/poverty/overview
2 - https://cdn.statcdn.com/Infographic/images/normal/23410.jpeg
Re: LinkedIn blocked due Meshtastic video in private chat
#164Re: LinkedIn blocked due Meshtastic video in private chat
#165Earlier quoted context omitted.
I lost access to a Google account almost a decade ago; trying to get it back was one massive Kafka trap. Every few years I go back and try navigating the Kafka trap again hoping against hope for better results. But I’m still locked out. It’s particularly frustrating because IMAP is setup for it into another google account, so I can still send and receive email from the address but I’m fully locked out of the service.…
How did you lose the account? Was there a reason from Google?
Re: LinkedIn blocked due Meshtastic video in private chat
#166> I have primary account (linked in my profile about) to my real name and thought it would be cool to have my open source project as account name on LinkedIn. And if I recall, I've seen similar approaches from others.
This is not how you're supposed to use LinkedIn. Your Open Source project is an organisation, not an account. I highly suspect the ToS says you can't have more than one account.
Re: LinkedIn blocked due Meshtastic video in private chat
#167I've always wondered about this. What happens if one of the big tech companies makes a mistake and closes your account? LinkedIn is pretty important nowadays when searching for work. Would you be able to make a new account? If not, that seems like a pretty big deal. Same concern with your email, or any of the other big services that we usually depend on. If I just suddenly lost my gmail, I would probably lose access…
It is kind of expected to have a profile you can link companies to, but I didn’t know people were actually active and engaging in discussions on the platform. I only sign in every few years to update something, but are you all actively exchanging with others on LinkedIn as a way to find jobs? I thought it was accepted since >10 years the whole platform is corporate noise.
Re: LinkedIn blocked due Meshtastic video in private chat
#168Earlier quoted context omitted.
I lost access to a Google account almost a decade ago; trying to get it back was one massive Kafka trap. Every few years I go back and try navigating the Kafka trap again hoping against hope for better results. But I’m still locked out. It’s particularly frustrating because IMAP is setup for it into another google account, so I can still send and receive email from the address but I’m fully locked out of the service.…
Just create a Hacker News post and hope it goes viral and then some Google employees will unlock it for you ;)
Re: LinkedIn blocked due Meshtastic video in private chat
#169Earlier quoted context omitted.
How did you lose the account? Was there a reason from Google?
I once had a functional bug where a MFA recovery email would receive the token, but the system would flag any further steps as ‘suspicious activity’. I also had an active gmail session via thunderbird, so I could easily have proven my claims legitimacy if required. Alas, there is no concept of support at google.
Re: LinkedIn blocked due Meshtastic video in private chat
#170Earlier quoted context omitted.
This happens regularly (perhaps not frequently) to people with their Gmail account. Google's AI says no, and there are very few people reporting successfully navigating the system to get their account back. This is one of the anti-google arguments, the other main one being they kill big projects all the time. You are right though, it can be crippling, and this thinking part of your personal (and business) risk profil…
I lost access to a Google account almost a decade ago; trying to get it back was one massive Kafka trap. Every few years I go back and try navigating the Kafka trap again hoping against hope for better results. But I’m still locked out. It’s particularly frustrating because IMAP is setup for it into another google account, so I can still send and receive email from the address but I’m fully locked out of the service.…
2. Add your former account to your family
3. Accept the Google One invite through IMAP
4. Contact Google One support from your secondary account
Hope this helps