I have a feeling that the tree structure of comments in which most of the discussion usually takes place under the first few most upvoted comments might not be the best to have scientific discourse, but also don't know what would be better. On the other hand, papers/journals themselves could be seen as a ultra-high latency social network in which replies happen in the form of papers that reference the work they're re…
I think you're onto something! A retrospective history of science styled as an HN clone would be amazing, will any of you dare?
Show HN: HackerNews but for research papers
161–170 of 209 posts
Re: Show HN: HackerNews but for research papers
#162Re: Show HN: HackerNews but for research papers
#163I have a feeling that the tree structure of comments in which most of the discussion usually takes place under the first few most upvoted comments might not be the best to have scientific discourse, but also don't know what would be better. On the other hand, papers/journals themselves could be seen as a ultra-high latency social network in which replies happen in the form of papers that reference the work they're re…
Re: Show HN: HackerNews but for research papers
#164Also, there's an issue with click propagation on the sort drop down. I had to click between Top Rated and back a few times because the click kept causing the underlying post to open. FWIW, this was on mobile.
Re: Show HN: HackerNews but for research papers
#165Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think you're right. I want to find experts in each field who can help me create a 'most important papers' section that people like me (who don't know anything) can go to to understand the most important and 'hottest' ideas and see the discussion around them.
What iamwil says is “one niche topic”, and why he says it is: Such social media platforms need a small niche community to get started. I think such a platform would be most useful for AI papers. If I were in your shoes, I’d pivot to targeting AI papers only and allocate 90% of my time on community building.
Hacker news used to be called Startup news, because all it did was talk about startups. pg only expanded it later because only startup news was too boring.
Reddit only started with a few topics, IIRC-- /r/programming r/startups, and something else. Just topics that the founders found interesting.
AI is the right way to go. It's what people are interested in right now, and market demonstrates there's a need with existing twitter handles and newsletters that purport to cover AI papers.
Re: Show HN: HackerNews but for research papers
#166Re: Show HN: HackerNews but for research papers
#167Also, would love to be able to search for articles from the same site e.g https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=papertalk.xyz
Re: Show HN: HackerNews but for research papers
#168Especially the Active, and Best Comments pages.
Also, would love biological fields in there. We bio/med people really don't have much as to message boards
Re: Show HN: HackerNews but for research papers
#169Did you consider just running a Lemmy instance with perhaps different time decay parameters?
Can you explain? Don't know what a Lemmy instance is. I did think about using time decay to give a more HN-like experience but haven't gotten around to implementing it yet.