Here's a great PDF I found on the ADA's website from fall 2023: https://professional.diabetes.org/sites/default/files/media/... > This content is brought to you by Splenda, a proud supporter of the American > Diabetes Association > A Message from Splenda > Splenda® is committed to helping people achieve their health goals by making it > easier for people to reduce the amount of added sugar in their diet. You likely k…
Does the American Diabetes Association work for patients or companies?
161–170 of 212 posts
Re: Does the American Diabetes Association work for patients or companies?
#162> Over 100 million Americans have diabetes or prediabetes These two are not the same. It is dishonest to combine the two. https://www.chicagotribune.com/2016/07/29/prediabetes-the-ep... I'm not quite ready to publish my hypothesis that prediabetes is a scam. I need to research it a little more. But a statistician friend of mine responded: A handful of years ago, I looked into the National Health and Nutrition Evaluat…
> pre-diabetes [...] is rather close to the median level but according to the NIH, 30.7% of Americans are overweight, and 42.4% are obese. as the median American is overweight, it doesn't seem a stretch to claim that the median American is also pre-diabetic? I don't know whether it's true or not, but your evidence seems a bit thin.
https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics-report/index.ht...
Re: Does the American Diabetes Association work for patients or companies?
#163Earlier quoted context omitted.
Travel to some other american countries and ask them what they think of the appropriation of the word. Not everyone is a fan. I don't really get how you think a company using the name of the country is wrong but somehow a country appropriating the name of the continent is just fine?
I think you’re getting offended on behalf of a cohort of people that do not exist. Let them speak for themselves if they do.
"American" is one of the idiocies of the English language, and you'll notice it is the only language that presumes that that word refers only to US citizens.
Re: Does the American Diabetes Association work for patients or companies?
#164David Unwin is a real hero, things are starting to move hopefully for diabetics Recommanded readings https://nutrition.bmj.com/content/early/2020/11/02/bmjnph-20... https://nutrition.bmj.com/content/early/2023/01/02/bmjnph-20... https://nutrition.bmj.com/content/early/2023/12/14/bmjnph-20... Those papers are the most read papers of BMJ nutrition whole history, and this is the top journal of the field
Also check out the Newcastle Protocol by Prof. Roy Taylor, now adopted by the NHS: https://www.ncl.ac.uk/magres/research/diabetes/reversal/#pub...
Even though calorie restriction works great in lab rats as the researcher can control what the rat eats and the rat can't do anything about it regardless of how hungry it becomes, it's not that simple with humans, particularly after a year or two, once the initial willpower is lost.
So, rather than fixating on lowering calories without further considerations, a more effective approach is maximizing the satiety obtained per calorie consumed. It's harder than it sounds! One might be tempted to simply consume large quantities of leafy vegetables, but that will only lead to them learning how hunger is a multidimensional experience. What do I mean by that? You can feel your stomach stretched out and full, and still feel hungry, because satiety isn't only triggered by how far your stomach has stretched, nor by the precise number of calories you have consumed.
In practice, in order to maximize satiety one must strike a balance between the volume of the food consumed, its protein content, and the amount of insulin-raising carbohydrates it contains. That's the reason so many people find success in low-carbohydrate diets, which emphasize these three satiety factors rather than the excessively simplistic calorie count approach.
Re: Does the American Diabetes Association work for patients or companies?
#165Earlier quoted context omitted.
Also check out the Newcastle Protocol by Prof. Roy Taylor, now adopted by the NHS: https://www.ncl.ac.uk/magres/research/diabetes/reversal/#pub...
Consuming fewer calories, especially fewer carbohydrates, will help lower your blood insulin, which is the necessary condition that allows adipose tissue to finally release its excess stored energy. Even though calorie restriction works great in lab rats as the researcher can control what the rat eats and the rat can't do anything about it regardless of how hungry it becomes, it's not that simple with humans, particu…
Re: Does the American Diabetes Association work for patients or companies?
#166> In case you’re curious, the ADA and Splenda appear to be still at it. As I write this, the ADA’s Diabetes Food Hub web page still features no fewer than 203 recipes – some marked “sponsored”, some not – that include Splenda, whose parent company’s $1m contribution has brought to light the utter insanity of our diabetes epidemic. If you call yourself the " American Diabetes Association", (why) aren't there regulatio…
Part of the First is that the government cannot ban you from using a word unless there is a very good reason do so. "American" is a word that is not associated exclusively with the government, nor was it ever used that way historically. In fact, the word "American" predates the US Government.
Since the word does not now, nor has it ever, implied governmental affiliation, it would be illegal for the US Government to attempt to obtain a monopoly on the word by banning others from using it.
Re: Does the American Diabetes Association work for patients or companies?
#167Earlier quoted context omitted.
I strongly disagree with you about Janus. The point of that decision by a right-wing court was to make it harder for public sector workers to stand together in unions. Unions are democratic institutions, with dues and leadership decided by the membership, and the idea that some people pay and some don't even though the entire unit is represented doesn't make a ton of sense. Just like it wouldn't make sense if 2 peopl…
> public sector workers A group for whom even FDR, the great co-opter of unions, had to pretend to be opposed to unionization. Seriously, civil service protections are there for you and don't apply to private-sector employees. But you claim the right to strike against your fellow citizens and deprive them of government services? This isn't Andrew Carnegie; it's your fellow citizens.
2. I advocate for private sector to unionize as well. I’m not the one who brought up Janus/private sector.
3. You’re telling me people with important jobs (private or public) shouldn’t be able to strike to improve the very services we all depend on? Hospital workers striking for better patient ratios? Teachers for their students?
Taking away those freedoms is wrong and dangerous.
Re: Does the American Diabetes Association work for patients or companies?
#168Earlier quoted context omitted.
The insight being low carb can send T2 diabetes into remission?
Isn't it known that 800 kcal diet (brutal) will reverse T2D? Iirc, 90% remission, 12 patient study, nejm article
Re: Does the American Diabetes Association work for patients or companies?
#169Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes it is new. The WHO only changed their guidance about a year ago [1]. Still, as far as I know the evidence is only associational. From the paper the article links to: "Potential for reverse causality cannot be eliminated". [1] https://www.who.int/news/item/15-05-2023-who-advises-not-to-...
So it sounds like artificial sugars can actually cause diabetes? That's unfortunate. Occasionally I drink Coke Zero as an alternative to Coke, but perhaps I should start replacing that with unsweetened seltzer water like La Croix.
Re: Does the American Diabetes Association work for patients or companies?
#170Earlier quoted context omitted.
> There is type of diabetes that is simply hereditary and that is all there is to it. This is a common misconception. Type 1 diabetes cases are more often acquired with no family history, there are some genetic associations but it is actually less strong than Type 2 (insulin resistance/diet related diabetes) where family history is a substantial risk factor. Pregnancy (gestational) diabetes isn’t just pregnancy relat…
Do we know if type 2 diabetes itself is actually hereditary, or is it possible that the genetic component makes individuals eat more sugar which causes type 2 diabetes?
I see that, but I have not made a study