Live data from Hacker News

New models and developer products

openai.com

161–170 of 561 posts

Re: New models and developer products

#161

Earlier quoted context omitted.

HN is quite notorious for that Dropbox comment I suspect that video is going to end up more notorious, it's even funnier given it's the VCs themselves

More context, please. EDIT: I guess it's this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8863#9224

that's the one

Re: New models and developer products

#162
post #71

Every day this video ages more and more poorly [1]. categories of startups that will be affected by these launches: - vectorDB startups -> don't need embeddings anymore - file processing startups -> don't need to process files anymore - fine tuning startups -> can fine tune directly from the platform now, with GPT4 fine tuning coming - cost reduction startups -> they literally lowered prices and increased rate limits…

> - vectorDB startups -> don't need embeddings anymore

they don't provide embedings, but storage and query engines for embeddings, so still very relevant

> - file processing startups -> don't need to process files anymore

curious what is that exactly?..

> - vertical ai agent startups -> GPT marketplace

sure, those startups will be selling their agents on marketplace

Re: New models and developer products

#164
Copyright Shield

> OpenAI is committed to protecting our customers with built-in copyright safeguards in our systems. Today, we’re going one step further and introducing Copyright Shield—we will now step in and defend our customers, and pay the costs incurred, if you face legal claims around copyright infringement. This applies to generally available features of ChatGPT Enterprise and our developer platform.

So essentially they are giving devs a free pass to treat any output as free of copyright infringement? Pretty bold when training data sources are kinda unknown.

Re: New models and developer products

#166

Is there a special "developer" designation? I am a paying API customer, but can't see gpt-4-1106-preview in the playground and can't use it via the API.

Apparently they'll be granting access at 1pm PST. We'll see what happens. Rate limits also don't seem to be updated yet to reflect their new "Usage Tiers" - https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/rate-limits/usage-ti...

Re: New models and developer products

#167
post #71

Every day this video ages more and more poorly [1]. categories of startups that will be affected by these launches: - vectorDB startups -> don't need embeddings anymore - file processing startups -> don't need to process files anymore - fine tuning startups -> can fine tune directly from the platform now, with GPT4 fine tuning coming - cost reduction startups -> they literally lowered prices and increased rate limits…

[deleted]

Re: New models and developer products

#168
We just changed a project we've been working on to try out the new gpt-4-turbo model and it is MUCH faster. I don't know if this is a factor of the number of people using it or not, but streaming a response for the prompts we are interested in went from 40-50 seconds to 6 seconds.

Re: New models and developer products

#169
post #71

Every day this video ages more and more poorly [1]. categories of startups that will be affected by these launches: - vectorDB startups -> don't need embeddings anymore - file processing startups -> don't need to process files anymore - fine tuning startups -> can fine tune directly from the platform now, with GPT4 fine tuning coming - cost reduction startups -> they literally lowered prices and increased rate limits…

Well, if said startups were visionaries, the could've known better the business they're entering. On the other hand - there are plenty of VC-inflated balloons, making lots of noise, that everyone would be happy to see go. If you mean these startups - well, farewell.

There's plenty more to innovate, really, saying OpenAI killed startups it's like saying that PHP/Wordpress/NameIt killed small shops doing static HTML. or IBM killing the... typewriter companies. Well, as I said - they could've known better. Competition is not always to blame.

Post reply on HN