Live data from Hacker News

Amazon Prime Video content to start including ads next year

bbc.co.uk

161–170 of 335 posts

Re: Amazon Prime Video content to start including ads next year

#161
post #69

Imagine a world where a guy worth over 150 billion dollars who owns a company worth over a trillion dollars and has a quasi-monopoly over the internet is in such desperate need of more money to the point where he's going to put advertising on his video platform, even though people already pay for the platform. Instead of raising prices moderately, or putting better content on the platform, they decide to instead put…

You ignored the first paragraph of the article that says you can pay for an ad-free option, which would qualify as “raising prices moderately” to me.

Odds are near 100% that Amazon has been running Prime Video at a loss since it started. They spent $16B on content last year. They can stop producing so much content or they can find ways to make more money. Either way people will snark about how greedy they are for not running a service at a loss forever.

Re: Amazon Prime Video content to start including ads next year

#162
post #48

I flat out do not watch ads. If a platform has ads, I do not watch it full stop. I pay YouTube for no ads. If I lost that option, I would not watch YouTube. Same with all of the other streaming services. Netflix pushed it last year with preview rolls. It was barely acceptable/tolerable. But I will eagerly jettison any service that makes me pay for ads. Heck, I even look askance at people who willingly pay money to un…

Most people I stumble upon wearing logos due it for signaling. The logos send signals like "I can afford this", or "I'm into sports". As a side effect, they're walking billboards for the brands, but that's just that: a side effect.

Re: Amazon Prime Video content to start including ads next year

#163

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Find me an unbranded pair of basketball shorts that will last 10 years, have consistent sizing, and cost less than $20 at an outlet and I’ll gladly buy them. I could gamble on “YAWHOHOMELIFE Men's Running Workout Shorts Training Gym Athletic Joggers Sweat Short Pants Quick Dry Breathable with Zip Pockets”, or pay like $5 more for a little white embroidered check mark and the aforementioned benefits without needing to…

What I've found is that "serious" equipment tends to have subdued branding, or at least has some options like that. I have a pair of basketball shorts that are still going strong after something like 12 years. They're Nike, but the logo is black on black, so barely visible if you don't look for it. Ditto for the basketball shoes. The logo is barely visible since it's the same color as the shoe. The shoes are somewhat…

re: motorcycle gear: Rev'it has some pretty neutral branded options, but not inexpensive... I've had good luck with the quality and fit.

Re: Amazon Prime Video content to start including ads next year

#164
post #63
post #48

I flat out do not watch ads. If a platform has ads, I do not watch it full stop. I pay YouTube for no ads. If I lost that option, I would not watch YouTube. Same with all of the other streaming services. Netflix pushed it last year with preview rolls. It was barely acceptable/tolerable. But I will eagerly jettison any service that makes me pay for ads. Heck, I even look askance at people who willingly pay money to un…

You brought up my pet peeve... it's really difficult for me to shop for sports/outdoorwear. I absolutely can't stand being a walking billboard. The worst part is I'm paying to be one. grrrr.

I try to find clothing that has no logos or logos that are easily removed (Eddie Bauer, for example). It's a pain, though.

Re: Amazon Prime Video content to start including ads next year

#166
post #95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Honest question. Where you buy your clothes from? As much as I would like to buy clothes without logos, they are not easy to find where I live.

I live in Finland. My favorite place to get sportswear and just daily wear is H&M. No logos. My favorite design house is Makia. Really amazing stuff. https://makia.com/ but if it has a big-assed Makia logo I don't buy it. When I lived in New York there were so many options it was hard to choose, but I'd check out used clothing boutiques for fun things.

FWIW, in the US, H&M is known for fast-fashion, garbage-tier clothing. I've heard the brand is better outside the US, though.

Re: Amazon Prime Video content to start including ads next year

#167
post #143
post #48

I flat out do not watch ads. If a platform has ads, I do not watch it full stop. I pay YouTube for no ads. If I lost that option, I would not watch YouTube. Same with all of the other streaming services. Netflix pushed it last year with preview rolls. It was barely acceptable/tolerable. But I will eagerly jettison any service that makes me pay for ads. Heck, I even look askance at people who willingly pay money to un…

Logos on shoes are useful. Here's how I used to buy shoes: 1. Go to a Payless ShoeSource store. 2. Find the sneaker (AKA trainers, tennis shoes, kicks, takkies, sportex, and many other names depending on where you are in the world) aisle. 3. Look at the logo on the shoes I'm wearing. 4. If they have the same shoes in my size, and I don't see any others that are noticeably less expensive, buy those shoes again. 5. If…

Payless filed for bankruptcy in 2019 and hasn't had a brick and mortar store in years. It begs the question: how often are you buying in a physical store?

Re: Amazon Prime Video content to start including ads next year

#168

I'm willing to buy Blu-Rays. I'm also willing to stop watching "content" altogether. I'm already hating the experience of the forced unskippable ads for Paramount shows that play at the beginning (AT MAX VOLUME) of every Paramount+ channel stream (Star Trek... sigh). If I have to watch ads like regular network TV, which I now find unwatchable, I'd just have to do without.

You have "content" in quotes, but during the actors and writers strike, there isn't even "content"

The business of media distribution drives us to talk about the stories we enjoy engaging with as though they are toiletries we're restocking from the store. I replaced my empty box of tissue with more "content," yay! I put that in quotes because I actually dislike the viewpoint that term comes from. I watch stories and performances, think on them, talk about them, and sometimes come back to them. I don't consume content, as if it were used up after I watch it once.

I hope the writers and actors get a fairer shake, especially with unreasonable terms for generative AI based on actor likenesses and voices. (We get to scan you once, pay you once, and use that "data" forever without ever paying you again.)

Re: Amazon Prime Video content to start including ads next year

#169
post #69

Imagine a world where a guy worth over 150 billion dollars who owns a company worth over a trillion dollars and has a quasi-monopoly over the internet is in such desperate need of more money to the point where he's going to put advertising on his video platform, even though people already pay for the platform. Instead of raising prices moderately, or putting better content on the platform, they decide to instead put…

You ignored the first paragraph of the article that says you can pay for an ad-free option, which would qualify as “raising prices moderately” to me. Odds are near 100% that Amazon has been running Prime Video at a loss since it started. They spent $16B on content last year. They can stop producing so much content or they can find ways to make more money. Either way people will snark about how greedy they are for not…

Yeah, people get so weird about this stuff. It's TV shows, not food and water. There should be no obligation for anyone to produce and distribute this stuff at a loss.

Price increases are fine. Inevitable, really. I just really hope that in the long term we'll get to keep the month-to-month model and the "pay more for no ads" model.

Re: Amazon Prime Video content to start including ads next year

#170
They've already killed Prime Video in the last year.

I cancelled my Amazon Prime subscription yesterday because:

- 1-day delivery is not a thing anymore

- Prime Video used to be my favorite streaming service, now it sucks. Every time I want to watch something, I have to pay an additional subscription, and it's way too hard to find what's actually included

- it's too expensive for the value it provides (70€). Actually I'm not sure what value it provides anymore

Post reply on HN