Live data from Hacker News

Turkey’s earthquakes show the deadly extent of construction scams

economist.com

161–170 of 320 posts

Re: Turkey’s earthquakes show the deadly extent of construction scams

#161

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We have the same problem in Telluride. I have to pay an extra 20k to get an upgraded circuit to charge my Rivian when I am already under the limit.

If it costs you 20k to upgrade a circuit, your story is missing some important details.

This sort of thing can easily spiral to needing a new main power line due to the increased amp requirements.

Re: Turkey’s earthquakes show the deadly extent of construction scams

#162
post #161

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If it costs you 20k to upgrade a circuit, your story is missing some important details.

This sort of thing can easily spiral to needing a new main power line due to the increased amp requirements.

Yes. But the price of those combined should still be nearly an order of magnitude cheaper than $20k.

$20k is "gut and rewire everything in an expensive metro area" kind of money.

Re: Turkey’s earthquakes show the deadly extent of construction scams

#163

Libertarians: this is why we have building codes. We don't need builders cutting corners and harming people years down the road, because profit convinced them that was the right thing to do for their own interests.

Just because some building codes have a good purpose doesn't mean all building codes do. On another forum there was recently a long discussion about the requirement for x number of power outlets in hallways of single family homes. This was added when wall-to-wall carpeting was fashionable and people in homes without outlets in the hallways were using extension cords so their vacuum cleaners could reach all of the carpet. The theory was that it kept people from tripping over excessively long cord or from daisy chaining together too many extension cords. Is this something that should be legally mandated for everyone? Especially since wall-to-wall carpeting has fallen out of fashion, robotic floor cleaners exist, as do much lighter, often battery powered, canister vacuums.

The cost of wiring up a hallway and putting in some outlets is only a small fraction of the cost of a new house but when you have dozens and dozens of these types of requirements, it does drive up the cost for a benefit that exists at a much lower level than when the requirements was added.

One of the suggestions was that if a homeowner didn't like the requirements, they could petition the authors of the International Residential Code for an amendment during the next release of the code manual in three years. This sounds reasonable to bureaucratic authoritarians but isn't something an individual should be required to go through just because they're not interested in living in a 1970s shag carpeted retro wonderland.

Re: Turkey’s earthquakes show the deadly extent of construction scams

#164

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, the code is always overzealous (never met an exception), and the smaller the house the more overzealous it is. If it wasn't, we would have a much easier time persecuting people that breaks it, and much more public sympathy for large culprits that actually have much fewer (relatively to their capacity) strings over then than any random person. The same applies to fire codes.

> The same applies to fire codes. As someone who has been close to almost-tragedies caused by fires, can you give me examples where fire codes are over-zealous? I've had family almost getting killed, even though they did follow the fire codes - the didn't even get a fine or a case against them. If you ask me, the fire codes were not strict enough in that instance.

Kitchen Sinks are required to have an outlet within 2 feet. I redid our kitchen and we ran into that issue. There were outlets on every corner of the island but all slightly farther than 2 feet away. Lucked out and our rough inspector let it slide. Finish inspector called it out but luckily they let it slide because the rough inspector let it slide. Theoretically they could have made me rip it all out.

Spooked me enough to make me not get permits for the next renos. Too many arbitrary rules that can make projects spiral without any real safety improvement.

Re: Turkey’s earthquakes show the deadly extent of construction scams

#165

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, the code is always overzealous (never met an exception), and the smaller the house the more overzealous it is. If it wasn't, we would have a much easier time persecuting people that breaks it, and much more public sympathy for large culprits that actually have much fewer (relatively to their capacity) strings over then than any random person. The same applies to fire codes.

> The same applies to fire codes. As someone who has been close to almost-tragedies caused by fires, can you give me examples where fire codes are over-zealous? I've had family almost getting killed, even though they did follow the fire codes - the didn't even get a fine or a case against them. If you ask me, the fire codes were not strict enough in that instance.

In my city, there is a required setback of 4' on all sides for solar panels to be installed on flat roofs... all flat roofs. I have a flat roof garage that is 12' x 24' and this law, which is ostensibly for large commercial flat roofs, is preventing me from putting more than 2 panels on my roof. This is the fire code.

Re: Turkey’s earthquakes show the deadly extent of construction scams

#166
post #10

My wife has worked in the 'enforcing building codes' sector of engineering for her entire career. And it's so frustrating to watch. Everyone - everyone - is certain that the codes are all overzealous and their little thing needs an exception. Politicians get elected promising to 'get rid of the red tape'. And then an event occurs and we learn why these building codes exist. Like workplace safety rules, they are writt…

Engineering requirements for buildings in America come in two forms: code-conforming buildings that can be built by anyone, and whatever you want as long as a qualified engineer has signed off on it. When looked at from that perspective, it's clear that the code exists to make the construction business cheaper and more efficient. Nothing about the code will prevent you from building anything you really want. You just need engineers.

Re: Turkey’s earthquakes show the deadly extent of construction scams

#167
post #161

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This sort of thing can easily spiral to needing a new main power line due to the increased amp requirements.

Yes. But the price of those combined should still be nearly an order of magnitude cheaper than $20k. $20k is "gut and rewire everything in an expensive metro area" kind of money.

There's no way you're getting a new box, meter, and service wire for $2k anywhere in the US. Certainly not California.

Plus, lots of places require these to be buried. So you've got trenching costs and that's a pain too. $20k is definitely within the ballpark of a cost.

Re: Turkey’s earthquakes show the deadly extent of construction scams

#168
post #161

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This sort of thing can easily spiral to needing a new main power line due to the increased amp requirements.

Yes. But the price of those combined should still be nearly an order of magnitude cheaper than $20k. $20k is "gut and rewire everything in an expensive metro area" kind of money.

Haha absolutely not. PG&E says that 5% of projects in California cost over $20k just for trenching in new underground service feeder. That doesn't even begin to mention the new main panel and all the branch wiring behind it.

If you need to upgrade your panel it can easily cost $100k.

Re: Turkey’s earthquakes show the deadly extent of construction scams

#169

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is it more than 1 story? Then run, don't walk, away. Don't do tall buildings in seismic zones without the benefit of an incredible amount of engineering practice, inspections, audits, and enforcement. If you suspect the locals are corrupt, your safest place during an earthquake is a straw hut or reasonable facsimile thereof.

Japanese and Taiwanese buildings taller than a single story seem to fare fine.

I'm assuming that is answered mostly by the second paragraph OP wrote that you seemed to miss:

>[. . .] without the benefit of an incredible amount of engineering practice, inspections, audits, and enforcement.

Re: Turkey’s earthquakes show the deadly extent of construction scams

#170
post #158

To be fair to Turkey's builders - 800 year old castles in the quake zone were completely destroyed. So this was a once in a thousand years event basically, otherwise the castles would have been destroyed long ago. Very very hard to plan for this kind of thing.

A lot of historical monuments have been significantly reconstructed or periodically reinforced so this doesn't necessarily follow.
Post reply on HN