Live data from Hacker News

Kraken lays off 30% of staff

blog.kraken.com

161–170 of 238 posts

Re: Kraken lays off 30% of staff

#161
post #153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My understanding is the crypto prices are driven primarily by the amount of liquidity injected in the market. Or, at least, that’s the case in the current cycle. Fraud is bad, but it has less impact.

But doesn't huge amount of fraud dissuade new investors?

Absolutely! And the current investors flee as well. Just less of an overall impact of draining liquidity.

Re: Kraken lays off 30% of staff

#162

> We’re reducing our global workforce by approximately 1,100 people, or 30 percent, in order to adapt to current market conditions. Why does a crypto exchange need 4,000 employees?

I would assume most of the 1.1k people is support. You have timezones, hundreds of thousands of customers (if not millions). Kraken has one of the best support I encountered. But with less people buying/selling (as with Amazon: Less buying stuff, less using etc), companies are laying off Marketing, Customer Support, maybe Recruiters and HR. Maybe stopped side projects. I would not expect they shrink their engineering…

30% of Eng was cut. Multiple engineers on my team were cut. The QA team was basically wiped out. As far as I can tell, all the lawyers are still here.

Re: Kraken lays off 30% of staff

#163

> Since the start of this year, macroeconomic and geopolitical factors have weighed on financial markets. This is an incredible couching of the last 9 months of cryptocurrency market behavior. Does anybody actually operate on their belief that "geopolitical factors," rather than astonishing amounts of fraud , are responsible for the current downturn?

For the life of me I cannot understand how every single layoff notice talks about "macroeconomic factors." Inflation and interest rates are up - okay. But real GDP growth (in the US at least) has been positive. Why is everybody acting like unemployment is at 8%, GDP growth is sharply negative, and consumer spending is way down? At least with crypto stuff it makes sense that these companies are losing shitloads of mon…

The current layoffs are concentrated in the tech sector because that sector experienced huge growth when everybody was stuck at home. With that now over, it’s just a regression to the mean and employment trends are going back to being in line with the rest of the economy.

Re: Kraken lays off 30% of staff

#164
> Since the start of this year, macroeconomic and geopolitical factors have weighed on financial markets.

Am I the only one who finds it ironic that they blame geopolitical factors affecting what was shilled as a safe heaven from governments and geopolitical games?

Re: Kraken lays off 30% of staff

#165

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I feel like HN should just auto add a comment that says "Why does need employees?" with a follow up comment that explains how large corporations work. It literally comes up in every single layoff announcement or other discussion of company size in some way, and the follow on comments are essentially the same every single time. I'm not saying that a lot of these companies aren't overstaffed (indeed, that's why they ar…

I've come to look at it the other way. "Because that's how large companies work" is a lazy non-answer. An honest answer to this question would break it down: # of engineers, # of ops, # of sales, # of hr, etc. And ideally break it down by business division. Of course that requires some real domain knowledge. I've personally watched morons come in, hire lots of useless employees, and destroy millions of dollars of cas…

Maybe they were needed to computerize their operations instead of using manual spreadsheets as some recent clownfests were reported to do?

Re: Kraken lays off 30% of staff

#167
post #73
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If it were up to HN, I swear, every company would just have 30 employees or it's a "waste".

HN thinks a junior developer bootstrapping a webapp over the weekend is production ready.

npm install crypto-exchange

Re: Kraken lays off 30% of staff

#169
post #136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The fraud seems to get political very quickly with FTX. Sam Bankman donated enormous amounts of money to democrats. He was the second biggest donor behind George Soros. He said he also donated an equivalent amount to establishment republicans via dark money channels. Sam Bankman was clearly a smooth political operator.You don't have meeting with Gary Gensler the head of the SEC otherwise.

How could being the second and third largest donor to Dems/Reps respectively at the same time be a good strategy? Genuinely curious.

The point of political donations (at this scale) is not to get your preferred candidate elected. It is to get leverage with the candidate who ends up getting elected.
Post reply on HN