Independent software is the new gold rush. A few people getting rich and the rest getting nothing.
BuiltWith: $14M ARR, no employees
161–170 of 191 posts
Re: BuiltWith: $14M ARR, no employees
#162Earlier quoted context omitted.
> the vast increase in regulations and liability around handling data, Can you elaborate on this or give examples where these bigger hurdles than they used to be? I'm curious to know in what domains this is the case. I've no doubt that it is true, but my sense was that there are still large swaths of "internety" products that are entirely or mostly unregulated and where there isn't much to be said about how you handl…
GDPR-like regulations certainly come to mind. Which is a good thing - too much unprotected data in one place is a disaster for all involved.
Re: BuiltWith: $14M ARR, no employees
#163Earlier quoted context omitted.
I mean, I run a startup not doing that much worse. I have 0 accountants (pay CPA yearly for tax work). 0 lawyers. 0 devops. 0 QA. 0 monitoring . 0 HR. I do have : 3 devs (if I include myself) 3 support (tickets) 2 other supporting roles If I coded 100% myself (which I have in the past and could in the future, it would just mean less new features) and had a way to not answer tickets (like the OP story it sounds like d…
That might be SAAS. The other side of the coin is not the same. You do a multi year multi million dollar deal with a fortune 100, don’t expect 0 lawyers, 0 CPA’s.
Re: BuiltWith: $14M ARR, no employees
#164Earlier quoted context omitted.
I mean, I run a startup not doing that much worse. I have 0 accountants (pay CPA yearly for tax work). 0 lawyers. 0 devops. 0 QA. 0 monitoring . 0 HR. I do have : 3 devs (if I include myself) 3 support (tickets) 2 other supporting roles If I coded 100% myself (which I have in the past and could in the future, it would just mean less new features) and had a way to not answer tickets (like the OP story it sounds like d…
So you are 8 people. Quite a lot different than a single person. If you had a way to not answer tickets, that means you would not offer support to customers, so likely a lot less customers would be interested to pay you. You don’t get to 14 millions by cheaping out that way.
Re: BuiltWith: $14M ARR, no employees
#165Out of curiosity, is there an open source version of BuiltWith? I'm not necessarily looking to use it, but it might actually be an interesting project to work on. I'm sure you learn a lot of interesting things trying to map everything out..and then there's the parsing/extracting and other aspects of this that could be fun if you're into that sort of thing.
You’re welcome to help out. :)
Re: BuiltWith: $14M ARR, no employees
#166Re: BuiltWith: $14M ARR, no employees
#167Even if the ARR is half of that, how do you keep your level of service as a single employee? Don't you take a break, go to a vacation? What happens if you're sick? At the level that starts with $295 and goes up to $495 and $995, I guess that the customers expect the service to work all the time and have fast support. Can't understand how it's done without employees at all.
How customers respond to this is another question, and most of the time companies strive to have good service because they value growth higher than 'lack of employees'. But everyone is entitled to their own approach.
Re: BuiltWith: $14M ARR, no employees
#168Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not at all.
Most companies (and seo experts) vastly prefer .com domains though; wether for valid reasons or not, this still is the case. Squatters make loads of money from companies getting another tld and then later buying the .com.
Lots of places around the world do not default to the com domain name and it doesn’t make sense to treat a word without a TLD as a domain name.
Re: BuiltWith: $14M ARR, no employees
#169Earlier quoted context omitted.
What do you mean? Give me some examples. There are plenty of saturated niches.
They will always be niches that certain people deem to be saturated, but that won't stop a determined entrepreneur from starting up a new venture. If you went back to January 2007, the iPhone didn't have competition from Samsung's flagship touch-based phones or Google Pixel (because they didn't exist yet). This was a time when Nokia, Blackberry, Sony Ericsson etc were the dominant phone makers and Steve Jobs' origina…