Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's a fine perspective to have, but many people feel that a government of elected representatives is a better place for determining and adjusting impacts on people.
I find myself in the utterly bizarre position (to me, anyway) of defending a megacorp against government interference because government has failed to reign in the bad behavior of the entire rest of the software market . Granted the EU's headed the right direction, but they've still not gone far enough, and the US is way behind. I hope EU citizens get what they want, but am also hoping we don't see those effects blee…
App Store doesn't accept “too simple” apps
161–170 of 364 posts
Re: App Store doesn't accept “too simple” apps
#162Re: App Store doesn't accept “too simple” apps
#163"Thanks for purchasing the Acme Kettle! In order to boil your water, you need to download an app! But don't worry, it's easy! You just need to create an account, enter your personal data, accept our legally binding terms and conditions and verify your phone number and your email, "for your safety"! Oh and we will push mandatory OTA updates to your kettle's firmware! We may remove functionality to your Kettle from time to time, to protect you and your loved ones!
Release Notes
v 0.0.112 - we are sunsetting the "boiling" functionality. the ability to boil water has been removed. Acme Corporation recommends using the kettle as a jug, it's ideal for cold drinks!"
Re: App Store doesn't accept “too simple” apps
#164Ran into the exact same problem with a very simple camera app I made. Camera app was completely gesture based. So you never had to find a button to quickly flip the camera to the other side of the phone or find the button to start/stop recording. It made using a camera a lot quicker to get multiple shots of a scene and your reaction shot. Also added in stabilization to the front lens, which was easy but wasn't enable…
Re: App Store doesn't accept “too simple” apps
#165Re: App Store doesn't accept “too simple” apps
#166Earlier quoted context omitted.
FWIW, I completely got your point. The Android ecosystem is horrible for this kind of thing. There are roughly 200,000 varieties of calculator apps. Why? There should be some criteria to help consumers avoid poorly supported simplistic clones that are often just filled with adware.
Yeah… I’m a relatively sophisticated consumer, and the state of the Play Store means that if I’m looking for any app to “do a thing” (as opposed to an official app for a company), it’s effectively impossible for me to get that app only via my phone. I have to wait until I’m at a desktop with a big screen and mouse/keyboard where I can efficiently browse through reddit comments and GitHub repositories to figure out wh…
Re: App Store doesn't accept “too simple” apps
#167Re: App Store doesn't accept “too simple” apps
#168Its weird. This app looks significantly more complex than the simple note taking app I developed [1] and I managed to publish mine without any concern. [1] https://cfx.lu/remindme
Re: App Store doesn't accept “too simple” apps
#169Re: App Store doesn't accept “too simple” apps
#170Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don’t see how that wouldn’t make sense… It’s not that they decided to set an arbitrary threshold of 3.7M apps, but that they have become more stringent on app approvals in light of the growth and quantity of apps in their store. I don’t think GP’s comment requires an incredulous snarky response, despite me not doing a great job making this point…
FWIW, I completely got your point. The Android ecosystem is horrible for this kind of thing. There are roughly 200,000 varieties of calculator apps. Why? There should be some criteria to help consumers avoid poorly supported simplistic clones that are often just filled with adware.
Aren't ratings and reviews good enough?