Live data from Hacker News

Guido van Rossum: Let Web3 die in a flaming ball of fire

twitter.com

161–170 of 316 posts

Re: Guido van Rossum: Let Web3 die in a flaming ball of fire

#161
post #94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Cryptoeconomics has been a mix of successes & failures, among the very-privileged who can afford to take financial risks, for just the last ~13y. Everyone involved knows there's a lot of things left to solve, but sees reasons for hope. For 100+ years, the most fervently 'socialist' regimes have promised various utopias but actually delivered famines, prison camps, pathologically dishonest & oppressive police states,…

Thanks for proving my point with perfect irony.

And thanks to you, for demonstrating your flimsy analogy can only be defended with attitude, not reasoning!

Re: Guido van Rossum: Let Web3 die in a flaming ball of fire

#162

I just created the worlds slowest database. People will have to pay many dollars to specialists called "miners" to update it. For design reasons, no one can delete anything from it. It's going to change the world.

Yeah, but at least all of your data are public.

Re: Guido van Rossum: Let Web3 die in a flaming ball of fire

#163

I just created the worlds slowest database. People will have to pay many dollars to specialists called "miners" to update it. For design reasons, no one can delete anything from it. It's going to change the world.

I just created the world's most redundant and incorruptible database. People will have to pay many dollars to specialists called "miners" to add rows. For integrity reasons, no one can delete anything from it. It might change parts of the world where redundancy and integrity are threats to very powerful people who want to control transactions and corresponding data. -- Fixed it for you

> For integrity reasons, no one can delete anything from it.

Except if they're the central authority, in which case they can unilaterally rollback the blockchain, rewrite history and fork? Totally makes sense.

Re: Guido van Rossum: Let Web3 die in a flaming ball of fire

#164

Isn't a brutish tweet still a brutish tweet no matter who its from? There have been infinitely more interesting crypto conversation starters on this board than this - I don't care who the author is - I care about the content, of which this has none.

If you notice that this tweet is a reply to a person that called Guido out who seems to be somewhat pushy about calling people out - it is a perfectly fine answer.

If someone on the street comes out of the blue and wants something from me there is no obligation that I have to be nice.

Especially if that someone seems to be building his personal profile on calling out people on TT.

Re: Guido van Rossum: Let Web3 die in a flaming ball of fire

#165

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I just created the world's most redundant and incorruptible database. People will have to pay many dollars to specialists called "miners" to add rows. For integrity reasons, no one can delete anything from it. It might change parts of the world where redundancy and integrity are threats to very powerful people who want to control transactions and corresponding data. -- Fixed it for you

>It might change parts of the world where redundancy and integrity are threats Sadly it won't. There is nothing about any kind of cryptocurrency that makes it incorruptible or immune to integrity problems. That's more myth-building that I hear quite often but it's not true. The hardest part in any data integrity problem is verifying that the data going into the system was correct in the first place, and blockchains c…

Claiming a technology is not a silver bullet is a statement that contains no useful information, because no technology is a silver bullet. However, blockchains do provide a very high level of durability across various dimensions, and some integrity failures reduce onto durability failures.

Re: Guido van Rossum: Let Web3 die in a flaming ball of fire

#166
post #147

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's incorrect, you can't "change anything in the database" with a 51% attack. You can block transactions from being processed, reorder new transactions, and reverse your own (but not others) transactions to double spend. You can't just go arbitrarily deleting previous transactions, or modifying balances.

I'm curious, if you owned 51% of the network what's to stop you from rebuilding the entire history of the chain and then adding new transactions (including any of your new fraudulent ones) on top?

Nothing, that's called a hard fork. It has happened (out of consensus) and probably will happen again.

Re: Guido van Rossum: Let Web3 die in a flaming ball of fire

#167

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> For design reasons, no one can delete anything from it. This is a feature, not a bug.

The bug part comes in when someone stuffs a few child porn images into the chain, making mere possession of a full node carry jail time in the US. Even better, due to strict liability, "I didn't know" or "It's not mine" aren't valid defenses. I wouldn't want to have to tell a judge "I can't remove it" in a libel proceeding, either.

That’s a feature, since it will force society to resolve a variety of incoherent laws.

Re: Guido van Rossum: Let Web3 die in a flaming ball of fire

#170

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> For design reasons, no one can delete anything from it. This is a feature, not a bug.

The bug part comes in when someone stuffs a few child porn images into the chain, making mere possession of a full node carry jail time in the US. Even better, due to strict liability, "I didn't know" or "It's not mine" aren't valid defenses. I wouldn't want to have to tell a judge "I can't remove it" in a libel proceeding, either.

Hmm, now I'm wondering why this hasn't happened yet? Is there be a way to encode arbitrary data inside a transaction?
Post reply on HN