Earlier quoted context omitted.
Meming about and being afraid of WW3 is critical in containing/deescalating it. WW1 happened partly because nobody was afraid of it happenning.
> WW1 happened partly because nobody was afraid of it happenning. That is an interesting take on it. It may not be wrong, but I hadn't heard that before.
YouTube suspends The Hill for playing clip of Trump denying election results
161–170 of 872 posts
Re: YouTube suspends The Hill for playing clip of Trump denying election results
#162Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's a huge difference: in Bush v. Gore, Gore stepped aside for the good of the country, choosing to respect the institution of the courts even if the decision was dodgy. Trump is willing to burn down the institutions if it gives him an edge. The danger from the Trump narrative is not that die-hards are still grumbling, it's that the candidate doesn't seem to care about anything beyond his own interests.
eh, I think you're being pretty generous to Gore there. It was a long, drawn, fought out battle involving many lawsuits and lots of court coverage. In the end, when Gore had basically lost all of his challenges, he did "step aside" as far as dropping the lawsuits. But he continued to be a presence and he was still pretty bitter about it many years later (and brought it up nearly every time he was on TV). 6 years late…
To say "Gore is better than Trump on this" is to imply that they are both operating in the same universe, just on different levels. That is a false premise. There can be no comparison here.
Re: YouTube suspends The Hill for playing clip of Trump denying election results
#163Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yup. Literal verbatim Kremlin narrative and framing. Not sure what's LOL about that. Have you never seen this before?
You may have to reconsider this one, the title looks bad, but it's from a few years back and his opinions don't seem to align with Russia's in the slightest (among other things he has stated Ukraine should have kept their nuclear weapons as a deterrent for Russian invasion, in 1993).
Re: YouTube suspends The Hill for playing clip of Trump denying election results
#164Earlier quoted context omitted.
Just wait until GPT3 deep-fake audio. Closely followed by Deep-fake video. And algorithms will amplify this content to the echo chambers that "want" to hear it to increase ad revenue a few percentage points. All this will enter society at a time when trust in institutions is already low; you already hear some people predicting that there may not be an election with uncontested results (in the USA) ever again. If we s…
Hate to say it, but deepfake audio and video are already pretty convincing (though post processing is needed)
Re: YouTube suspends The Hill for playing clip of Trump denying election results
#165Right on. If you are dumb enough to censor, you can only censor content and the frame you are looking through doesn't make any difference. Imagine in a totalitarian regime, you would like to inform people on system critical thoughts others have been executed for, so people can avoid them.
That's the purpose of newspeak and doublethink. To ultimately communicate by their absence from official channels the list of things that cannot be said. Of course, Russia has has more experience with this than anyone. But as a sibling post says, they've reached the point where plenty just enjoy killing, and the west could too, at some point.
The problem of newspeak is that most of us don't see it, until it's too late. When we feed the machine with our fears, it will cut us off.
Most of us still like each other.
Re: YouTube suspends The Hill for playing clip of Trump denying election results
#166Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hillary Clinton wasn't making those claims via deranged tweets and speeches from the Oval Office in her position as President of the United States. A private citizen on one hand versus the leader of a country with the power of the press and an angry, violent mob on the other. One person's complaints versus a firehose of misinformation, lies and possibly Russian-backed agitprop being spread by the leader of the countr…
That applies to Trump's response to the 2020 election too. He's a private citizen now, so his tweet equivalents and lawsuits don't matter
It's the false equivalence I'm objecting to. It seems clear to me that one side went off the deep end further than the other in this case.
Re: YouTube suspends The Hill for playing clip of Trump denying election results
#167Earlier quoted context omitted.
WWII happened despite people being afraid of it happening. Could you elaborate on your point?
The factors in World War 2 were much different, public sentiment didn’t matter. Nazis would have taken Poland in 1939 and pursue the Soviet Union sooner, it was inevitably a World War. World War 1 was editable. World War 1 was very much avoidable. Time and time again World War 1 has been called unnecessary because the original dispute that triggered the conflict was limited.
Re: YouTube suspends The Hill for playing clip of Trump denying election results
#168Re: YouTube suspends The Hill for playing clip of Trump denying election results
#169I’m becoming more convinced that the future I’ve been planning simply won’t be possible in the decades to come. The world is scarcely recognizable. And having experienced nothing but peace and prosperity makes me feel woefully unprepared. The WEIRD world is becoming increasingly more authoritarian. I’m already detached from real conflict and scarcity, knowing nothing but peace and prosperity, and the TikTok generatio…
Re: YouTube suspends The Hill for playing clip of Trump denying election results
#170This is what "private companies can do what they like" results in.
Due to network effects there is no legitimate competition to YouTube, so YouTube needs to be regulated as a monopoly (unless maybe TikTok has started hosting longform videos instead of just people doing stupid dances).