Live data from Hacker News

uBlacklist: Blocks specific sites from appearing in Google search results

github.com

161–170 of 317 posts

Re: uBlacklist: Blocks specific sites from appearing in Google search results

#161
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am not sure of the current state of affairs, but in the past (5-10 years ago or longer) w3schools was known for having outdated or sometimes flat out wrong information. They often rank or ranked higher than MDN which is usually the best and most comprehensive source on the subject. So a front end dev would typically want to always see MDN over w3schools.

My w3schools workaround is appending `mdn` to any search for something related to web standards

I have been part of the beta test for kagi search engine (kagi.com) and my favorite feature is you can prefer/mute websites. So for example I prefer MDN so the site is ranked higher if it shows in the search results. Note I’m unaffiliated with them but the product/team is great so rooting for them to succeed.

Re: uBlacklist: Blocks specific sites from appearing in Google search results

#162
post #156
post #115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Google literally had an official Chrome extension called “Personal Blocklist (by Google)” serving this purpose in the past.

had? What happened to it?

It broke, then eventually got delisted. Presumably the person working on it left and no one cares to work on something that clearly won’t lead to promotions? There’s a “Personal Blocklist (not by Google)” now.

Re: uBlacklist: Blocks specific sites from appearing in Google search results

#163
post #78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, as someone (re)learning modern CSS/HTML, I really don't understand the hate they get. For a beginner (at CSS/HTML anyway, I'm an HPC engineer otherwise with lots of low-level experience), I think it's a great resource, with good examples too. I can only assume they used to be different?

In terms of the site design itself, it's always been like that - the w3schools site has always had the clean, readable presentation (and it's a pretty easy argument to make that it's much more approachable for a newbie than MDN). The main complaint was with the content. In the past there were some pretty big problems with content on w3schools. Often common footguns (of which there are many in Javascript) were not cov…

They used to publish vulnerable code as examples without any context. For example...

XSS: https://web.archive.org/web/20060722051641/http://www.w3scho... / https://web.archive.org/web/20060722073110/http://www.w3scho... / https://web.archive.org/web/20060722072840/http://www.w3scho...

Unauthenticated sessions: https://web.archive.org/web/20060716141638/http://www.w3scho...

MySQL injection: https://web.archive.org/web/20110412041949/http://www.w3scho...

Nothing directly wrong with this one but prepared queries were not well understood at the time: https://web.archive.org/web/20060718041049/http://www.w3scho...

They were very easy to learn from and thus widely popular, but missed critical security context.

Re: uBlacklist: Blocks specific sites from appearing in Google search results

#164

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think it's similar to PHP, they're criticized by the vocal newbies who are chasing the newest and shiniest. For me personally, w3schools has been one of the most reliable sources of reliable solutions that work not just for the latest Chrome build but across many different browsers and platforms. Given the cumulative nature of HTML, "outdated" is another word for "reliable and established", IMO.

They were much worse before. See the old version of w3fools website: https://web.archive.org/web/20110412103745/http://w3fools.co... They're better today, but it's still... let's say an equivalent of empty calories instead of a healthy MDN meal.

I don't see how MDN is a healthy meal when they document only shit which works exclusively in Chrome and Firefox, while claiming everything else is "deprecated" and ignoring all other browsers.

More like synthetic junk food, if you ask me.

Re: uBlacklist: Blocks specific sites from appearing in Google search results

#165
post #80

As others have said, it can also be done with a uBlock filter. For example, here are my filters that block and remove terrible copycats/translations of StackOverflow https://gist.github.com/quenhus/6bd2c47e5780f726f0c96c0a2ee7... . I hate these copies that somehow manage to be better referenced than StackOverflow.

This is amazing. I tried extending this to remove all pinterest results too (the real cancer of the internet) but the filter doesn't seem to be working.. Any tips? google.*##.g:has(a[href*="pinterest.*"])

Nuking Pinterest off of the Internet is what immediately came to my mind as well!

Re: uBlacklist: Blocks specific sites from appearing in Google search results

#167

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It hurts Google to allow the product to choose what customers have access to it.

Extend this to map search - If only I could exclude all starbucks, 7/11, even Denny's from my map searches for 'coffee shop'. No hate to those who like the coffee from there, but I want a proper coffee shop and if I could filter out certain chains, I would do it in a caffeinated heartbeat. This applies to not just Google maps though.

This would be an interesting app to build on OpenStreetMap data.

Re: uBlacklist: Blocks specific sites from appearing in Google search results

#168
post #157
post #151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Every time I accidentally click a Quora search result it makes me so unhappy. I must have missed the memo about Pinterest though. I always liked that site but haven't been on there in a while. I'm reading up on what's wrong and it sounds like a few years ago it started drowning in ads. Then this year they pushed an update that caused half their users to stop using the platform. Is that accurate?

What's wrong with Quora? Now I don't use Quora for any serious source of information, but it's just a site with lots of fun anecdotes. Reading these anecdotes isn't a bad way to pass the time; it's IMO much better than mindlessly watching videos on Instagram or TikTok (which I don't do at all).

My experience with Quora is it's extremely unpredictable. Sometimes you get lucky and get a high quality answer by a subject expert. Sometimes you get junk answers.

Re: uBlacklist: Blocks specific sites from appearing in Google search results

#169
post #157
post #151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Every time I accidentally click a Quora search result it makes me so unhappy. I must have missed the memo about Pinterest though. I always liked that site but haven't been on there in a while. I'm reading up on what's wrong and it sounds like a few years ago it started drowning in ads. Then this year they pushed an update that caused half their users to stop using the platform. Is that accurate?

What's wrong with Quora? Now I don't use Quora for any serious source of information, but it's just a site with lots of fun anecdotes. Reading these anecdotes isn't a bad way to pass the time; it's IMO much better than mindlessly watching videos on Instagram or TikTok (which I don't do at all).

For me "better than Instagram" is not sufficient

Re: uBlacklist: Blocks specific sites from appearing in Google search results

#170
post #151

The great cat and mouse game 1. uBlock - Blocks annoying ads 2. Sponsorblock - Blocks annoying nordvpn, curiositystream, et al 3. uBlacklist - Blocks annoying pinterest, quora, et al Keep the good fight going guys. Kudos!

Every time I accidentally click a Quora search result it makes me so unhappy. I must have missed the memo about Pinterest though. I always liked that site but haven't been on there in a while. I'm reading up on what's wrong and it sounds like a few years ago it started drowning in ads. Then this year they pushed an update that caused half their users to stop using the platform. Is that accurate?

Pinterest was terrible also earlier. Kept appearing in image search results, on following link image was not present.
Post reply on HN