Live data from Hacker News

PSA: uBlock/AdBlocks on Chrome to lose function thanks to Manifestv3

old.reddit.com

161–170 of 334 posts

Re: PSA: uBlock/AdBlocks on Chrome to lose function thanks to Manifestv3

#161
post #18

How about posting what we’re losing for those out of the loop. That Reddit link is pretty useless.

Lots of things are changing. Here is Google's migration guide.[1] I've also personally seen some issues with the `` and `https://*/*` permissions to allow access to all pages, though I have not seen those well-documented elsewhere and it could just be user error. I've gone back to Mv2 for now, planning to fork Chromium to re-enable it for my personal extensions.

https://developer.chrome.com/docs/extensions/mv3/intro/mv3-m...

Re: PSA: uBlock/AdBlocks on Chrome to lose function thanks to Manifestv3

#163
For all the claims that the sky is falling, I'd like to know which functionality is still missing in declarativeNetRequest. Extended rule limits, dynamic rules, and header modification have been added. What else is required for a functional adblocker?

This reddit thread barely seems to understand the issue, never mind the technical deficiencies of the API.

Re: PSA: uBlock/AdBlocks on Chrome to lose function thanks to Manifestv3

#166
I remember a time when Google used to crank out a seemingly endless stream of stuff that basically were tremendous improvements to the internet.

Chrome itself was one of those amazing improvements.

These days are long gone it seems.

As a matter of fact, the exact opposite seems to be happening right now: every change coming out of a Google seems to improve their lot at the detriment of everyone else, especially their users.

The time to ditch Chrome was ~5 years ago, but if you aren't convinced yet, this latest "improvement" should be the straw that breaks the donkey's back.

Re: PSA: uBlock/AdBlocks on Chrome to lose function thanks to Manifestv3

#167
post #2

Are people really that adamant about blocking ads on the web? I don't understand why people think it's a good idea to remove the primary source of revenue for content creators. At the most it amounts to a very mild annoyance and ads also help small businesses to grow. Edit: I'd appreciate it if someone could respond to the points I made rather than simply complain about why they don't like ads.

I'm going to back up the GP on this! HN users tend to get annoyed by (1) ads, (2) paywalls, and (3) articles without enough research (aka time aka money). I'm cognizant of the fact that HN isn't a hive mind, and so these complaints aren't necessarily coming from the same people—but some certainly are. Well, which is it? Or do we expect content creators to work for free? If we have to pick a poison—and, well, I think…

> If we want to make information available to as many people as possible, an ad-supported model is the way to do it

There are alternatives, a good one I see used in Ptreon, the supporters get early access to content, the rest will get it a month later. Let me try find the pros and cons

Cons:

- you need first to find supporters, so for a while you need to work hard to get them

- some supporters might feel entitled to stuff, you need to make sure to be clear about what being a supporter means

- you need to be very clear and transparent , some supporters will not tolerate delays or low quality/quantity updates

Pro:

- you have a predictable revenue model, you don't depend on an algorithm

- you mostly don't have to censor your content (there are exceptions true, but there are alternatives)

- you don't have to promote scams like VPNs, shit games with loot boxes, crypto scams

- you are not forced by an algorithms to release on a certain text/video length , a certain schedule , use certain shitty thumbnails or click-bait titles

- if you make public your content after a month or week etc, your fans that don't have money still get it and will promote it, also influencers will promote it because they know it will be free after a time interval.

This patreon model does not solve everything, just wanted to mention that there are alternatives to shity ads that track and manipulate you. Other alternative would be honest contextual ads, like if you search for printer ink from city A then Google/Bing could show you an ad from a local shop that refils ink cartridges.

Re: PSA: uBlock/AdBlocks on Chrome to lose function thanks to Manifestv3

#168
post #140

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How do you choose in which profile links from outside of the browser should open?

This depends on what profile you make the the default startup profile in the profile manager

Do you know if there is a way to be prompted each time?

Re: PSA: uBlock/AdBlocks on Chrome to lose function thanks to Manifestv3

#169

*Off-topic:* I've experimented with a new layout in Firefox, and now I can't think of going back. I first installed Tree Style Tab. I then removed the tabs at the top of the window and added a permanent status bar to the bottom of the window using userChrome.css: https://i.imgur.com/PIONywj.png (edited to add, my userChrome.css: https://gist.github.com/anthonyclarka2/155c038de96e91894cbd4... ) (EDIT: I added some ext…

Off topic question on off topic comment: HN, what are your thoughts on Sidebery?

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/sidebery/

Re: PSA: uBlock/AdBlocks on Chrome to lose function thanks to Manifestv3

#170

Time and time again I try to switch to Firefox. But it always seems to fall short (for me at least). I rely too much on separate profiles to disconnect work-related browsing from personal browsing. Separate bookmarks, sessions, browser plugins, sync preferences etc... A UI that's as powerful is literally all that is needed for me anyway. Its such a shame they've neglected the Profile Manager.

You can launch Firefox with a given profile from the CLI. Just make your own shortcuts.
Post reply on HN